|
ABOUT THIS SITE
This website was created as a pet project to
better understand the workings of the Bush
administration. It is a sister site to eRiposte.
In this site, the remarkable rise of George W.
Bush to the office of President of the United States, and his singular
tenure as President are captured broadly. In keeping with the
President's acclaimed interest in education, key aspects of his
character and Presidency are examined and documented as hypothetical
coursework at the University of Compassionate Conservatism1. The
Bush administration is one that I believe is likely to fascinate
"revisionist historians" over time. It is also one
whose political brilliance cannot be understated. By exploiting the
environment subsequent to 9/11 - one in which the American media
largely absconded from its true responsibility as the fourth estate
for an extended period of time - the administration has created
an interesting trench in the ocean of American and world history2.
So what is this (hypothetical)
University all about? Well, President Bush came to office setting
certain expectations. For instance, he has indicated that a
"compassionate conservative" is a "reformer with
results." He has also stated that he had
"real plans for real people". He spends a lot of time talking
about values, family, character, and what not. So, naively I thought,
it might be a good idea to illustrate how the talk translates into the
walk, and how his "compassion" inundates us so often. In many
respects, I have come to discover that what I have captured here
constitutes merely the tip of his compassion iceberg. (For instance,
serial compassion is not specifically examined - e.g., Mr. Bush's
holding forth a certain position repeatedly in speeches).
You may ask what value this site adds,
given the numerous sites already existing on the Internet that focus
on the Bush administration. Clearly, the value will be determined by
the reader. My own goal with this site was to provide a means to
collate information in a manner that makes it much easier for
interested people to see what the administration is all about. I
present the information in concise tabular form, with links to sources
for people who want to read more details. I believe
that my site, as it fills up, will be the most comprehensive
information site on the Bush administration's "compassion",
"moral clarity", "promises kept", and
nominees/appointees. My hope is that my site will
make it easier for students, everyday people, bloggers,
information websites, and those in the media who actually care
to understand what this administration is all about, to find what they
are looking for and discover what they were unaware of.
I started this project in earnest in
the late April/early May 2003 timeframe and have been scouring the web
armed with Google and a gaggle of web sites (see below) to extract useful/interesting
information. I don't have Lexis/Nexis access (can't afford it) and I
was not paid in any form or fashion to do this. I undertook this
project because I thought it would be interesting (and it was/is). This is a non-profit
site.
DATA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am an avid reader of internet newsmedia
and blogs. I got virtually all my information from the websites I list
below. Additional sources are listed as appropriate in the
corresponding sections of my webpage.
Newsmedia I got a significant part of
my information from include the following. I read them:
Read DAILY: New York
Times, Washington
Post, Salon.com,
MSNBC, CNN
Read ONCE or TWICE A WEEK: The New
Republic, USA
Today, Time,
Newsweek
In particular, I would like to acknowledge the Paul
Krugman Archives website.
Bloggers, e-zines, information sites,
political sites and economics sites I got the most significant
portions of my information, include:
Read DAILY: Atrios/Eschaton,
Politics, Law and
Autism, Calpundit,
Buzzflash, Daily
Howler, Thinking it Through
Read ONCE or TWICE a WEEK: Bushwatch,
Talkingpointsmemo
(TPM), Spinsanity,
Media Whores Online, Center for Budget and Policy
Priorities, Daily
Kos, Altercation,
Liberal Oasis
One of the other pieces that was forwarded to me by a reader - Carol
Swinney - was also useful in my research.
I apologize in advance if these sites are not explicitly cited against
articles that they referred to - it just became very difficult for me
to track not just the URLs for the articles, but also the URLs for the
sites referring to those articles. I do it sometimes and I don't do it
at other times and when I don't, the information was quite possibly cited by
one of the sites mentioned above.
OBTAINING VALUE FROM THIS
SITE AND SENDING ME FEEDBACK 3
First become a student! All the "course material" here will
prepare you to become a Compassionate Conservative!
When you complete these courses, you
will be able to see clearly how justifiable you were in voting for
this upholder of moral clarity back in 2000; if you did not vote for
him, you will naturally feel the shame of having been an
uncompassionate unconservative4.
No matter. At least now you will begin to truly understand how Mr.
Bush took the first steps towards restoring "respect",
"honor", and "dignity" to the White House and
therefore prepare to vote for him in Election 2004. You will
receive a certain number of Compassion Con5
credits once you have assimilated each lesson in each of the courses -
the total credits available for a course is simply the sum of all the
individual lesson credits shown in the last column of the tables you
will see. When you graduate, you will be able to use your credits
wisely by referring to the guidelines in the final course offered -
CC999 ("Using Compassion Con Credits"). The best way you can
tell if you have graduated with flying colors6
is when you are able to convince the rest of the world that it is
abjectly immoral, uncompassionate, unconservative and unpatriotic to
question the teachings and the practice of President Bush's
Compassionate Conservativism7. You
increase the likelihood of graduating with Honors if you do that even
as you simultaneously distribute the course material at your local
place of worship.
Now, some of you
will undoubtedly feel this University is way too partisan - that I am
too enamored by President Bush and his Compassionate Conservatism.
If you do so, without interest in the facts, I would respect your
compassion but would ask you to consider a certain columnist's
comments here
as a response. The point of this website is NOT to claim
that President Bush is never uncompassionate. It is to assess how
compassionate he can be as a person.
If you believe some of the content in the coursework
you are about to assimilate requires correcting, please
do let me know (at compassion-at-compassiongate-dot-com) - I may have compiled the coursework (which by
the way is updated regularly and by no means complete), but I do not
intend for any compassion to show by accident. I have to let
you know in advance that I cannot promise that I will respond to each
and every mail I receive. I would certainly appreciate civility
in discourse, so civility will increase the probability that I might
respond.
My responses will be at my sole discretion.
Others may feel that I am too
unpartisan and Bush-friendly by refusing to acknowledge your belief that Bush lies and
deceives, and that deception is a hallmark of his administration.
Well, let me put it this way - he is a compassionate conservative.
WEB TOOLS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Text logo: Media
Builder 3D Text Maker
Although at the time of this writing (7/25/03), I am unsure if I will
use Javascripts on this site, I will mention The
Javascript Source in my acknowledgements - if I do use any, it
will be one of their free scripts.
AN
ASIDE ON THE CONTENT
Some of the content on
this website may be password-protected (e.g., articles from the New
York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Salon.com etc.). I do provide links to what might be considered copyright
material but I would like to emphasize that such material is only made available on
this website in the form of URLs and relevant quotes. It is not my intent to distribute the material for profit or payment, since
this is
a personal opinion website that is non-profit. I provide these links
from a research/educational/informational standpoint only. I believe
this is in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107. Reference:
<http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml>.
FOOTNOTES
1. Some
comments are in order about terms/names:
(a) Some of you might actually wonder where this University is located - so, it is
appropriate to make it clear right here that this is not a real
University - it is only a hypothetical institute of
"learning".
(b) Some may wonder why this website is called Compassiongate. Well --
[.....]gate. (Probably a lot better than "CIA"
- meaning, Compassion Information Awareness.)
(c) I have tried hard to come up with a defining characteristic of
Compassionate Conservatism, as it is practiced. It is hard, but
I think what best separates a Compassionate Conservative (from
a true Conservative or Moderate) is the dearth (but not lack)
of a conscience. (Sometimes I am tempted to think Compassionate Conservatives
are probably closet atheists, but I don't mean to insult atheists by
that speculation.)
2. I will readily acknowledge that trenches have hillocks on them too.
But jokes aside, the period stretching from approximately the
mid-1990s to 2004 (or 2008 if President Bush gets re-elected) is
likely to be one of the most useful periods for Americans who actually
care about America - for it is a period that has exposed the real
"principles" and "family values" of ultra-right
wing fruitcakes masquerading as Conservatives, and all their myriad supporters
including many in
the Compassionate Media. What has become readily apparent is that
their judgments on "principles" and "family
values" apply to everyone except their own families and those
that they support.
This period also represents a sad and unnecessary moral decay of the Republican Party
(as opposed to its political rise), but has probably led to an ironical, unintentional, "reverse-McCarthyite"
effect - a tremendous opportunity for historians to
document the name of every fruitcake who has come out of the woodwork
and participated in
undemocratic and un-American excesses during this period. So, my
advice is this: sharpen
your pencils (so to speak) and make notes for the history books.
That said, I won't take away brownie points from the Bush
administration or Republicans for their political brilliance, helped
no doubt by the resounding political ineptness of the Democratic party
since (at least the year) 2000. As the continued DLC attacks on Howard
Dean show, the DLC is exhibiting its own sense of decay by showing
that divisiveness, rather than unity, is the sign of the times. O
tempora, o mores!
(Political Disclosures: I do support Howard Dean, but I am more
of a John Kerry supporter. I respect some of what George Bush, Sr. and
John McCain have stood for - so I am not entirely in the Democratic
camp).
3. Sarcasm alert.
4.
The word unconservative does not exist in the dictionary, but we
believe it is uncompassionate to deride us for this - you liberal
elite, you!
5. I sometimes prefer to truncate the words
Compassionate Conservative to Compassion Con. There is no intent here
to imply anything significant by this (at least anything more than is
commonly understood). I reserve all moral clarity rights to the use of
this term.
6. Not to be confused with the
American flag.
7. Note that Compassionate statements made by
Mr. Bush's spokespersons, advisers or appointees - speaking clearly on
behalf of Mr. Bush - are considered as being supported by Mr. Bush,
absent a public statement to the contrary.
|