|
UNIVERSITY OF COMPASSIONATE
CONSERVATISM (what
is this?)
You have selected
COMPASSIONATE
CONSERVATISM
201 B*
*President Bush's lies
and deception moral clarity,
honesty and integrity
during
Elections 2000 - Part II
In this course you will learn about the
abundant lies, deception or
intent to deceive moral clarity, honesty and integrity displayed by President
George W. Bush (at that time the compassionate conservative2
Gov. Bush from the state of
Texas) - during Elections 2000 (Part II). This
part covers his statements on Al Gore, on his own
character/beliefs/track record, on the Florida recount and Other issues.
Make sure you drop by again when the Election 04 (2004) campaign starts
picking up steam, so that you can refresh your memory on his
compassion. Please
note that the statements made by Bush or his
spokespersons/administration3 - as
cited in column 3 of the tables below - are by default extracted from
one or more of the links shown in column 4. If the source of the
statements is different from the link(s) in column 4, then a URL is
explicitly provided in column 3. For feedback and corrections, please go
here. A detailed
acknowledgement of the sites from which the information below was
obtained is listed at
this location. In particular, I would like to acknowledge the
following sites where I got the vast majority of links from: PK
archive, Atrios/Eschaton,
Politics, Law and
Autism, Calpundit,
Buzzflash, Daily
Howler, Thinking
it Through, Bushwatch,
Spinsanity, Altercation.
Total Compassion Con credits 2
available from this course to date = 105
Last
Update: 10/28/2003
Please select one of these sections
Once you are done with the above
sections, you may choose another course by picking one of the options
below
AL GORE <go back to the top>
Compassion Con credits total = 33
| # |
Topic |
Gov.
Bush or his team's
Compassionate statement |
Some Uncompassionate Facts |
Compassion
Con Credits |
| AG1-01 |
Al Gore and gun
policy |
Bush
"...On May 3, Texas Gov. George
W. Bush alleged that Vice President Al
Gore was once a member of the National Rifle Association..."
|
Jake
Tapper (Salon):
"...The Gore camp said it could find no evidence that
Bush's claim was true, and NRA spokesman Bill Powers said that
he, too, could find no record of Gore's membership in the
organization's microfiche, but the next day Bush repeated the
charge. Pressed by reporters as to how he could make such a
claim, Bush said, "He might have been a member, let's put
it that way."..."
|
1 |
| AG1-02 |
Al Gore and gun
policy |
Bush
"...I disagree with the vice president on
this issue. I don't -- he's for registration of guns I think the
only people who are going to show up to register or get a
license -- I guess licensing, like a driver's license with a gun
-- the only people who are going to show up are law-abiding
citizens..."
|
PBS
Debate Transcript:
"...VICE PRESIDENT GORE: Well, I'm
not for registration. I am for licensing by states of new
handgun purchases.
MR. LEHRER: What does that -- what's that mean?
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: Sort of a license ID, like a driver's
license, for new handguns. And, you know, the Los Angeles --
MR. LEHRER: Excuse me, you would have to get the license -- a
photo ID to go in and -- before you could buy the gun?
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: Correct.
MR. LEHRER: All right. And who would issue --
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: The state..."
Jerry
Politex (Bushwatch/TomPaine):
"...Fact: "Gore actually favors licensing for
new handgun purchasers but nothing as vast as registering all
guns." Salon, 10/12/00..."
|
1 |
| AG2-01 |
Al Gore and the
internet |
Bush
"...In the first debate, after Gore
pointed out some of the differences between the two candidates'
positions on Medicare, Bush replied, "I'm beginning to
think this man not only invented the Internet, he invented the
calculator."..."
|
The statement that
Al Gore (claimed to have) "invented the internet" is
blatantly false.
See eRiposte
Al Gore media bias page for relevant links.
|
1 |
| AG3-01 |
Al Gore and Willie
Horton
|
Bush (campaign)
"...said last week that the campaign
studied Gore's 1988 presidential bid and closely tracked this
year's Democratic primary fight...Gore, they argue, was the
first candidate to raise the specter of Willie Horton in the
1988 primary..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...As [Ceci] Connolly knows well-as
she has reported in the past-Gore never mentioned Horton's name
in the 1988 primaries. In one debate (out of 42 total), he
criticized the Massachusetts furlough program which had given
Horton a weekend pass. But he never mentioned anyone's name;
never mentioned anyone's race; never ran an ad on the subject;
and never used any photos at all. The claim that Gore engaged in
"slash-and-burn politics against fellow Democrats" by
"raising the specter of Willie Horton" seems
impossible to square with the facts. But these facts are never
mentioned in this article-an article in which Gore is repeatedly
accused by Bush and Bush officials of being
"integrity-challenged," "negative," "a
man who feels like he can say what he wants," and someone
who feels "free and comfortable about saying things that
simply aren't true." "Voters are tired of
slash-and-burn politics," Bush's advisers are quoted saying
in a large presentation above the article's headline. But in the
midst of these accusations and pious claims, Bush's team makes a
serious and baldly false claim about Gore. And Connolly-though
she knows the facts-never challenges or corrects their
assertions, or places them in a full context.
Does Connolly know the facts in question? She has
explained them in the Post in the past. Here is her account of
this matter in a January 24 article:
But one week later, Bradley was digging up
a 15-year-old vote Gore cast on tobacco while in Congress. He
then revived the debate over Gore's role in raising the prison
furlough of murderer Willie Horton against Michael Dukakis in
the 1988 presidential campaign. Although
Gore was in fact the first to tar Dukakis with that criticism,
Gore studiously avoided mentioning Horton's name or race...." |
1 |
| AG4-01 |
Al Gore and
mother-in-law's prescription drug costs
|
Bush ad
"...Remember when Al Gore said his
mother-in-law's prescription cost more than his dog's? His own
aides said the story was made up..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...The ad shows a 9/19 Washington
Times article. Headline: "Aides concede Gore made up
medicine story." But we've found someone else who makes
lots of things up—the Washington Times often makes up good
stories. Here is the actual part of the Times story where the
"Gore aides" make their "concession:"
BOYER AND SCULLY: In fact,
Gore aides yesterday could not say whether the candidate's
mother-in-law pays for the arthritis medication Lodine out of
her own pocket or if the cost is covered by insurance.
Does that sound like the aides "said
the story was made up?" The aides said they didn't know how
Gore's mom-in-law pays for the drugs. But Gore had never said
anything about that. He said (correctly) that his mother-in-law
and his dog both use the drug, and that the drug costs more for
humans than for pets. Here's the actual quote which appeared in
the press—the only quote which appeared in the press.
Gore: "While it costs $108 a month for a person, it costs
$37.80 for a dog." Those were figures from a congressional
study, which Gore used to sketch out the problem. For the
record: Boyer and Scully said Gore was correct about the
general problem. They wrote, "Gore's basic premise is
correct—prescription drugs in general do cost more for humans
than for pets." Sorry, folks.
"Gore aides" never said that "the story was made
up."..." |
1 |
| AG4-02 |
Al Gore and
Bush's Prescription drug plan
|
Bush
"...[Gore] talks
about numbers. I’m beginning to think, not only did he invent
the Internet, but he invented the calculator. (LAUGHTER).
It’s fuzzy math. It’s to scare them, trying
to scare people in the voting booth..."
Bush
"...GORE (to Bush):
95% of all seniors would get no help whatsoever, under my
opponent’s plan, for the first 4 or 5 years. Why is it that
the wealthiest 1% get their tax cuts the first year, but 95% of
seniors have to wait 4 to 5 years before they get a single
penny?
BUSH: I guess my answer to that is, the man’s running on
Mediscare, trying to frighten people in the voting booth.
That’s just not the way I think, and I that’s just not my
intentions. That’s not my plan..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...Earlier—in his second statement of the entire
night—Bush had accused Gore of using "phony
numbers," and he maintained that critique throughout the
debate, not excluding this ten-minute segment...In fact, the
discussion of prescription drugs was one of the great battles
royales in TV debate history...Bush was dramatically,
crazily wrong about his own prescription drug plan (by
all accounts, one of the issues in which voters were taking the
most interest). Repeatedly, Bush misstated his own plan,
attacking Gore’s character in the process. Gore said that
seniors earning more than 25 grand would get no help from
Bush’s plan for four or five years; Bush insisted that all
senior citizens, not just the poor, got "instant help"
under his plan. About this, Bush was clearly wrong, as that
visit to his web site would have shown. But Bush accused Gore of
"fuzzy math" when he correctly described the Bush
plan; he said that Gore was "running on MediScare, trying
to frighten people in the voting booth."...Brooks
Jackson, Inside Politics, next day:
JACKSON: Gore said
Bush’s prescription drug plan would at first give not one
penny to a couple make $25,000 a year. And this time, Bush
bruised the truth when he denied it.
BUSH (on videotape): Under my plan, the man gets
immediate help with prescription drugs.
JACKSON: Wrong, unless the man spends $6,000 a year on
prescriptions..." |
2
(1 for calling Gore a liar, and 1 for lying
compassion about his own plan) |
| AG4-03 |
Gore's prescription drugs plan |
Bush
"...the Gore
Plan Provides: No choices,
insufficient coverage. Al Gore
says he’ll fight for the people against HMOs, but his
prescription drug proposal forces seniors to join HMOs selected
for them by Washington..."
|
Jonathan
Chait (The New Republic):
"...Or consider prescription-drug coverage, Gore's
signature issue. Bush never showed much interest in the topic
until his recent free fall, when polls suggested Gore was
killing him on it. So rapidly did Bush embrace the issue that he
launched the advertisements touting his prescription-drug plan a
full week before he unveiled the plan itself. And, again,
offering a competing plan was not sufficient--Bush mimicked
Gore's arguments as well. The main differences between the
candidates' proposals are that Gore would spend more money to
insure more seniors and offer drug coverage through the Medicare
program itself, while Bush would spend less and rely more
heavily on HMOs for coverage. But that hasn't stopped Bush from
accusing Gore of "insufficient coverage." Nor has it
kept him from imitating the vice president's broadsides against
managed care by claiming, perversely, that Gore would
"force seniors into a government-run HMO."..."
|
2 |
| AG5-01 |
Al Gore and Bush's
tax cut proposal |
Bush
"...accused Vice President Al Gore of
using “fuzzy math” when Gore pointed out that Bush’s plan
would spend more of the surplus on tax cuts for the wealthiest 1
percent of taxpayers than on education, health, prescription
drugs and the national defense combined..."
"...Bush, citing figures his staff said
were from a review of his plan by Congress’ Joint Committee on
Taxation, said that $223 billion of the total would go to
these affluent taxpayers not the some $561 billion the Gore
campaign has suggested..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...For the record, there was one journalist who spoke in
real time, discussing Bush’s post-debate lying. Her piece
appeared on October 17, 2000. The sub-headline? “Bush seems to
be having trouble with math lately.”...[she wrote]
The next day on “Good Morning
America,” Bush admitted that Gore’s math wasn’t fuzzy
after all. Later that day on CNN, he changed his story again...
Bush’s attack on the vice president’s mathematical
calculations has a dual irony. First, Bush was using fuzzy math
himself…While Bush accused his opponent of using “fuzzy
math,” the Republican candidate’s own statistics were
partisan-created rhetoric rather than substantiated facts...
Gore was correct in his statement about Bush’s budget figures.
In Bush’s plan, the tax cut for the top 1 percent of Americans
($620 billion) is greater than total domestic spending on
education ($47.6 billion), health ($131.9 billion), prescription
drugs ($158 billion), and national defense ($45 billion)
combined.
Bush’s questionable calculations were made apparent again
during the second presidential debate last Wednesday. Again,
Bush defended his tax plan, saying that the top 1 percent would
receive only $223 billion. Likewise, the Bush campaign cites
that only 21 percent of the tax cut goes to the wealthiest 1
percent of Americans. But this 21 percent and associated $223
billion numbers do not include the repeal of the estate tax…
Ignoring these facts, Bush argued that his tax cut for the
wealthy was far less than his actual policies and plans
demonstrate.
...Who wrote this October 17 critique? Why, it
was Melanie Ho, a UCLA senior, writing in the Daily Bruin.
While mainstream “journalists” cowered and quaked—and told
the world what a liar Gore was—a college student was
somehow able to note the “irony” in what Bush was doing.
We’ve often asked if high school students could get away with
work like the press corps’. In the fall of 2000, only Melanie
Ho—a college student—had the courage to get this tale
right. Who created the Culture of Lying? Manifestly, your
“press corps” did..."
Daily
Howler:
"...Consummate clowning would be involved in the effort to
shoot down Gore’s statement. But it all began with a blunder
by Bush. The morning after that first debate, Bush appeared on Good
Morning America. Asked about Gore’s “one percent”
claim, Bush seemed to say that the claim had been accurate.
Charles Gibson had to ask his question two times. But the second
time, he got Bush to answer:
GIBSON (10/4/00): You said all of that.
But is he incorrect in saying that you would give to the top one
percent of income earners in this country in tax relief more
than you would spend on health care, prescription drugs,
education, and national defense combined?
BUSH: No. That’s what I just said. I think what people have
got to understand is, wealthy people pay a lot of taxes today.
And if everyone gets tax relief, wealthy people are going to get
tax relief.
To all appearances, Bush had said that
Gore’s claim was factually accurate. Clearly, that’s what GMA
thought he had said. “We heard Governor Bush just say that
Vice President Gore was right on the amount that he’d be
spending for the richest Americans,” Diane Sawyer said, a few
moments later. Within hours, though, that
had changed. By the afternoon of October 4, Candidate Bush was
trashing Gore hard, saying that his claims were invented. In an
interview with the Baltimore Sun’s Karen Hosler, he basically
called Gore a liar:
HOSLER: [Bush] spoke disparagingly of
figures Gore gave regarding Medicare. “I don’t know where he
drug up those numbers,” said Bush in his Texas twang,
“probably the same place he drug up the numbers on rich
people—he made it up.”..." |
2
(1 for calling Gore a liar, and 1 for lying
compassion about his own plan) |
| AG5-02 |
Al Gore and Bush's
tax cut proposal |
Bush
"...Larry Lindsey, Bush's chief economic
adviser, proclaimed, "The Joint Committee on Taxation
proves that Vice President Gore was badly mistaken, inaccurately
portraying Governor Bush's plan as costing sixty percent more
than it actually does."..."
Bush
"...I can’t let the man continue with
fuzzy math. It’s $1.3 trillion, Mr. Vice President. And it’s
going to go to everybody who pays taxes. I’m not going to be a
pick-and-chooser. What is fair is everybody who pays taxes ought
to get relief..."
|
The
New Republic:
"...Bush staffers
have been claiming it would cost just $1.3 trillion over ten
years--which, combined with some optimistic assumptions about
spending, would keep Bush's budgets from dipping into the red.
The problem is that independent analyses show that Bush's tax
cut would cost far more than $1.3 trillion, and the Bush
campaign has refused to reveal how it came up with the number.
This week, though, the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation
released an analysis of Bush's plan that showed it would indeed
cost only $1.3 trillion. The Bushies immediately announced their
vindication. Larry Lindsey, Bush's chief economic adviser,
proclaimed, "The Joint Committee on Taxation proves that
Vice President Gore was badly mistaken, inaccurately portraying
Governor Bush's plan as costing sixty percent more than it
actually does." Press accounts dutifully reported the
counterclaims in the scrupulously evenhanded style of daily
journalism.
But what the Bush staff did not mention--and none of the
reporters realized--is that the JCT data that the Texas governor
is touting do not cover the ten-year cost of Bush's tax cut--it
covers only the first nine years [CG emphasis]. The Bush campaign has been
shockingly dishonest about this. Its press release touts the
figure as accounting for the "Current `Ten Year' Budget
Period"; the quotes around the phrase "Ten Year"
apparently signify that the budget period in question is
actually nine years. "Ten Year" is perhaps meant as
some sort of figure of speech. Perhaps Bush should rethink his
plans to make honesty the central issue of the campaign..." |
2
(1 for calling Gore a liar, and 1 for lying
compassion about his own plan) |
| AG6-01 |
Al Gore and
investment of social security funds in stocks |
Bush
"...Now all of a sudden [Gore's] decided it's
okay to be managing money in the stock market. First the stock
market was roulette and risky, and now the heat's on, and he
changes position..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...But how much were pundits willing
to spin you? They were willing to spin you a lot. According to
Kelly, Gore's "big tax cuts" were "sudden"
and his retirement plan was "abrupt;" Gore had
reinvented himself out of nowhere. The great god Spin roared
with pride. But had the Gore cuts really come out of nowhere?
Ron Brownstein, in the Los Angeles Times, had recently mentioned
some facts:
BROWNSTEIN: In January, the Office of Management and Budget
estimated the operating budget surplus—that is, funds in
federal accounts excluding Social Security—would total $746
billion through 2010. But revenue growth linked to the booming
economy has been running so strong that OMB is expected to
estimate the on-budget surplus will be as much as $1 trillion
larger over that period.
In other words, as everyone (including
Kelly) well knows, the projected federal budget surplus will
soon officially double. And, as everyone (including Kelly)
knows, it is in that context that Gore "suddenly"
offered an increase in his proposed tax cuts. Strangely, Kelly
never mentions the impending change in surplus projections as he
trashes Gore for "suddenly" changing. But luckily,
Brownstein isn't a spinner. He described the way the new
projections were changing both parties' plans:
BROWNSTEIN: The new money has encouraged a
similar pattern of convergence and contrast [between Bush and
Gore] on Social Security. Last summer, when he prepared his
budget blueprint, Gore was forced to eliminate Clinton's
proposal for federally subsidized accounts that would help
middle-income worker save for retirement. Gore had to abandon
the proposal because he needed the money to fund his education
and health care ideas...But the surplus projections have grown
so large that Gore today, without retrenching any of his other
spending plans, is scheduled to unveil a variation on Clinton's
retirement account plan.
How hard is this to figure out? Previously, Gore couldn't
afford the retirement accounts. With the new budget projections,
they are affordable..." |
1 |
| AG6-02 |
Al Gore's social
security plan |
Bush
"...responded by charging that Mr. Gore's
Social Security plan will add no less than $40 trillion to the
national debt..."
|
Paul
Krugman (New York Times):
"...That seems like an awfully big
number. It turns out to be an estimate of the total value of
payments from the general government budget to Social Security,
including interest, that will take place over the next 50 years.
And I could bore you by explaining why that number is
meaningless. The really amazing thing,
however, is that the number has nothing to do with Mr. Gore.
It's true that Social Security will need transfers from general
revenue if Mr. Gore's plan is put into effect. But it will need
just as much money if Mr. Gore's plan isn't put into effect. The
only way to reduce the required aid would be to reduce the
benefits promised to retirees...Maybe blaming Mr. Gore for
future mortality wouldn't have worked; but Mr. Bush's advisers
seem to think that blaming him for the entire future liabilities
of the Social Security system will, or at least can serve
temporarily to confuse voters who might otherwise have started
to think too clearly about the subject. Only two weeks to go
until the election, and we can clean up the mess later,
right?..."
Also see: Sam
Parry (Consortium News)
|
1 |
| AG6-03 |
Al Gore and social
security |
Bush
"...Promoting
his own plan to allow workers to invest some of their Social
Security money in stocks and bonds, Bush said Gore "doesn't
think people are up to the task of managing their own
money." "This is analog thinking in a digital age, 28K
thinking in a broadband era, and eight-track ideology in an MP3
world," Bush asserted, drawing hearty applause and
laughter. "And our nation must move beyond it." Bush
has defended his plan to augment Social Security with
"personal retirement accounts" against Gore claims
that it would drain the underlying Social Security system by $1
trillion over ten years. "My opponent seems to be
deliberately missing a trillion dollars. Maybe if you've been in
Washington too long you lose your ability to count real
money," Bush said..."It is irresponsible for the
chairman of the Democratic Party and for Vice President Gore to
stoke the fears of seniors while ignoring the hopes of younger
workers," Bush said..."
|
Paul
Krugman (New York Times):
"...In context, it's pretty clear he meant that Mr. Gore is
an old-economy fuddy-duddy because he insists that you can't
spend the same money twice — that you can't divert Social
Security taxes into individual accounts for young workers and
use that same money to pay benefits to their parents. Well, it's
a new economy, but it's not that new. The rules of arithmetic
are the same, whether you use a slide rule or a supercomputer..."
Jonathan
Chait (The New Republic):
"...Bush acts as if this concept were new. It's not.
Indeed, the United States once had a retirement system in which
individuals made their own decisions and managed their own
money. This system would best be described as
"nothing." It's what we had before 1935, and it didn't
work terribly well: people who didn't earn lavish incomes over
the course of their working lives often ended up in poverty, as
did those who gambled on risky investments and lost. That's why
FDR's administration created Social Security: to make sure every
worker got a pension sufficient to pay for basic necessities
like food and shelter...
Bush, cleverly, has turned this into a moral argument. "Al
Gore, who calls these bipartisan proposals risky, has a
substantial amount of his money invested in the stock
market," he claims (erroneously). "Why does he object
to young Americans doing the same?" Of course Gore does not
object to young Americans, or anybody else, having money in the
stock market; he objects to cutting a guaranteed benefit in
order for them to do so..." |
2
(1 for lying compassion about
his plan 1 for lying compassion about Gore) |
| AG6-04 |
Clinton/Gore on
social security and Medicare |
Bush
said "...that the Clinton administration
did nothing "to strengthen Social Security and repair
Medicare,"..."
|
Richard
Cohen (Washington Post):
"...He lies when he says that the Clinton administration
did nothing "to strengthen Social Security and repair
Medicare," when a fair reading of the administration's
record suggests it did...."
|
1 |
| AG7-01 |
Al Gore's
overall spending plan |
Bush
"...charged that Gore’s spending
proposals are three times what Clinton proposed in 1992...said
Gore’s spending proposals are greater than the combination of
what Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis proposed in 1984 and
1988, respectively...
[claimed] Gore’s total spending
[proposal was]...$127 billion..."
|
Issues
2000:
"...Bush charged that Gore’s
spending proposals are three times what Clinton proposed in
1992. But back then, federal spending was constrained by the
federal deficit, which has been wiped out during Clinton’s
terms.
While Bush is correct that Gore’s spending proposals exceed
his, the combination of Bush’s spending plans and tax cuts
would eat up more of the surplus than Gore would with his more
modest tax cut and his larger spending plans.
To further complicate matters, Bush said Gore’s spending
proposals are greater than the combination of what Walter
Mondale and Michael Dukakis proposed in 1984 and 1988,
respectively. However, it appears Bush arrived at the number by
using inflation-adjusted spending proposals and comparing them
with estimates of Gore’s spending plans prepared by partisan
groups such as the Republican staff of the Senate Budget
Commitee. Gore’s total spending, according to the campaign,
would be about $88 billion a year, not the $127 billion the Bush
camp contends.
Source: Boston Globe analysis of St. Louis debate Oct 18,
2000..."
|
3 |
| AG7-02 |
Al Gore's
overall spending plan |
Bush
"...Under Gore’s plan, we’re talking
about. adding 20,000 new bureaucrats..."
|
Issues
2000:
"...ANALYSIS: Bush is basing his claims on a partisan
report by the Republican members of the Senate Budget Committee.
To get their numbers, they applied today’s ratio of employees
to expenditures to their own estimates of Gore’s budget. The
assumption-that more spending means more employees-DOESN“T
NECESSARILY FOLLOW. In fact, during the 1990s, spending went up
(by 38%) while the federal work force went down (by 12%).
Source: Presidential Debate, Boston Globe, “Number Crunch”,
p. A15 Oct 11, 2000..."
|
1 |
| AG7-03 |
Al Gore's
overall spending plan |
Bush
"...The Senate Budget Committee did a
study of Gore’s expenditures: it could conceivably bust the
budget by $900 billion..."
|
Issues
2000:
"...GORE: What he’s quoting is not the Senate Budget
Committee, it is a partisan press release by the Republicans..."
[CG note: it appears it was the GOP members of the Budget
committee - so it was a partisan release]
|
1 |
| AG7-04 |
Al Gore's
overall spending plan |
Bush
"...Bush said Gore was a big spender
whose proposals would bust the budget. And he said electing Gore
would mean the return of big government..."
|
Issues
2000:
"...Bush’s budget has less of a
buffer than Gore’s does. Bush’s budget would use all but
$265 billion of the surplus, and that is without paying for some
of his campaign promises, like missile defense. Gore says he
would set aside $660 billion of the surplus for a reserve fund.
Gore said he had helped slim down the federal bureaucracy
through his work on the administration’s Reinventing
Government initiative. Since 1992, the civilian government work
force has fallen by 400,000 people, to 1.82 million, although
nearly three-quarters of the reduction has been the Pentagon.
Some analysts measure the size of government by looking at total
spending relative to the size of the economy. By that measure,
outlays have declined steadily in recent years, to 18.7% of
gross domestic product this year. Gore said his plan
would push that figure down to 17% by 2008. Source: NY Times
analysis of St. Louis debate Oct 19, 2000..."
|
1 |
| AG8-01 |
Al Gore and Campaign spending |
Bush
"...in the first
presidential debate, the Republican claimed that the Gore
campaign had out-spent his. “This man has out-spent me,”
Bush said..."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...In fact,
Bush has raised and spent more than twice as much money in this
election as Gore has raised and spent.
There has been no explanation from the Bush campaign about this
remarkable claim and the national news media have not pressed
for one, as the media certainly would have if Gore had made a
similarly false statement.
.."
Daily
Howler (1999):
"...According to Ceci Connolly’s Post Magazine
cover story (4/4), the Gore campaign hopes to spend $47 million
during the upcoming primaries. This would include up to $16
million in federal matching funds--meaning the campaign itself
would have to raise $31 million from individual contributors...
CONNOLLY:
[W]hile the vice president’s game plan this year is
virtually the same as Lamar Alexander’s or Elizabeth Dole’s
or George W. Bush’s, his fund-raising machine is bigger,
tougher, faster.
But it’s hard to
know how to reconcile that with the fund-raising goals we have
stated. When Gore is raising $31 million to Bush’s $50
million, how is the Gore “machine” “bigger?” Indeed,
Connolly acknowledges the Bush camp’s plan later on in her
article:
CONNOLLY: In recent campaigns, wealthy contestants like Ross
Perot and Steve Forbes have tossed out the rule book and the
matching funds that come with it and spent their own millions
with no restrictions. And this year, Texas Gov. George W. Bush,
fearing Forbes will again use his wealth to carpet-bomb fellow
Republicans, is considering forgoing matching funds in order to
bust the spending limits in the early primaries..."
Also see: Daily
Howler
|
1 |
| AG9-01 |
Al Gore and the
environment |
Bush
"...''I think the vice president is
probably going to have to explain what he meant by some of the
things in his book, to share with us the philosophy behind some
of the standards in the book.''..."
|
USA
Today:
"...Later, Bush acknowledged he has not read ''Earth in the
Balance.''..."
|
1 |
| AG9-02 |
Clinton/Gore on National forest
protection |
Bush
"...said the
Clinton-Gore administration “took 40 million acres of land out
of circulation without consulting local officials. … I just
cited an example of the administration just unilaterally acting
without any input.”
..."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...Bush was referring to a pending administration proposal
to protect 40 million acres of roadless areas in national
forests from more road building and logging. As the Sierra Club
noted in a press release, Bush’s statement was false.
“In
fact, the Forest Service conducted 600 public meetings about the
proposal nationwide and more than one million Americans urged
the administration to strengthen the proposal,” the Sierra
Club said. “There was ample opportunity for local officials
and others to comment on the proposal.”
..."
|
1 |
| AG9-03 |
Clinton/Gore on ANWR
drilling |
Bush
"...I just found out the other day an
interesting fact, that there's a national petroleum reserve
right next to Prudhoe Bay that your administration had opened up
for exploration in that pristine area..."
|
Sierra
Club:
"...MISLEADING: The National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska
was set aside specifically for potential oil and gas production.
Last year, the Administration opened a portion of the NPR-A to
leasing and development, being careful to prohibit drilling in
environmentally sensitive areas, such as the Colville River
Delta and Teshekpuk Lake. The NPR-A lies far to the west of the
Arctic National Widllife Refuge and is separated from the
coastal plain by the Prudhoe Bay oil fields. Bush would like to
open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling even
though it contains many sensitive areas with unmatched
ecological diversity. The coastal plain of the Arctic Refuge is
home to polar bears, caribou, musk oxen and other rare species..."
|
1 |
| AG10-01 |
Clinton/Gore Army divisions
ill-prepared for combat |
Bush
said "...that two of the Army's 10 active
divisions are so ill-prepared for combat that, if called, they
would have to report, "Not ready for duty, sir."..."
|
Richard
Cohen (Washington Post):
"...The Army says Bush is flat-out wrong...."
Issues2000:
"...Bush had said: “If called on by the
commander-in-chief today, two entire divisions of the Army would
have to report ‘Not ready for duty, sir.’” But Maj. Thomas
Collins, an Army spokesman, told CNN: “All 10 Army divisions
are combat-ready, fully able to meet their war-fighting
mission.”..."
|
1 |
| AG10-02 |
Clinton/Gore Military spending |
Bush
said "Not since the years before Pearl
Harbor has our investment in national defense been so low as a
percentage"
|
Paul
Krugman (New York Times):
"...Strangely, if you looked at the numbers put out by his
economic team, you found that he actually proposed to reduce
that percentage further, spending substantially less on defense
than his opponent..."
POST-SCRIPT (2001)
"...Last week, according to newspaper reports, Mr. Bush
told lawmakers that there would be "no new money this year
for defense." Karen Hughes, a counselor to Mr. Bush,
conceded that "we may in fact need resources" for the
military — may? after all that martial rhetoric? — but made
it clear that there was no rush. One officer bitterly declared,
"It sounds like campaign promise No. 1 being
broken."..."
(Note that increased defense spending was proposed
by the administration only after its 2001 tax cut passed)
|
1 |
| AG11-01 |
Clinton/Gore on
children |
Bush
claiming "...Clinton and Al Gore
"have done nothing to help children"..."
|
Richard
Cohen (Washington Post):
"...His team--now I am including Dick Cheney--lies when it
says Clinton and Al Gore "have done nothing to help
children" when children, it can be fairly said, have been
an obsession of this administration. Among other things, the
Clinton administration doubled the funding of Head Start. Bush
himself now professes love for this program, which Cheney, while
he was in the House, voted to abolish....."
|
1 |
| AG12-01 |
Clinton/Gore on tax
cuts |
Bush
"...You were promised a middle class tax
cut in 1992. It didn't happen..." (suggesting Clinton/Gore
didn't keep a promise)
|
Jerry
Politex (Bushwatch):
"...Fact: "The administration negotiated a
budget bill with the Republican Congress in 1997 that included a
children's tax credit that reduced taxes for the middle
class." (E.J. Dionne, Jr., Houston Chronicle, 10/18/00) --Politex,
10/19/00..."
|
1 |
| AG13-01 |
Al Gore and EITC |
Bush
"...I felt during his debate with Senator
[Bill] Bradley saying he [Gore] authored the EITC [earned-income
tax credit] when it didn't happen..."
|
Jerry
Politex (Bushwatch/TomPaine):
"...Fact: "Actually, Gore had claimed to have
authored an "expansion of the earned-income tax
credit," which he did in 1991." Salon,
10/12/00..."
|
1 |
STATEMENTS
RELATING TO BUSH'S CHARACTER/BELIEFS <go back to the top>
Compassion Con credits total = 33
| # |
Topic |
Gov.
Bush or his team's
Compassionate statement |
Some Uncompassionate Facts |
Compassion
Con Credits |
| BS1-01 |
Being a moderate |
Bush
"..."Real Plans for Real
People."... "Compassionate conservatism"...
"Reformer With Results"..."
|
Jonathan
Chait (The New Republic):
"...Last Monday, George W. Bush
visited a retirement home to discuss Medicare and prescription
drugs. On Tuesday, his topic again was health care. On
Wednesday, he turned to the environment. On Thursday, it was
education and the achievement gap. The theme, his campaign
explained, was "Real Plans for Real People."
Or, put another way, "I'm a moderate"--which has been
the message behind practically every Bush slogan for the last
year. "Compassionate conservatism" meant "I'm
different from the Republican Congress." "Reformer
With Results" meant "I'm as different from the
Republican Congress as John McCain is." Bush's convention
refrain--"They have not led. We will"--meant
"I'll pursue the same goals as the Clinton-Gore
administration, only more effectively." "Real Plans
for Real People" means "My policies are as mainstream
as Al Gore's."
Given the political landscape--most voters support the
Democratic positions on major issues--Bush's message of
moderation is good strategy. It is also a lie. In the substance
of his program, Bush is running to the right of Bob Dole in 1996
and to the right of today's Republican Congress...His proposed
policies, if enacted, would alter government more dramatically
than anything in the last three generations. "We will look
back at the Bush years," predicts GOP activist Grover
Norquist, "as moving the country further and faster toward
individual liberty than the Reagan years." Conservative
columnists George Will and Lawrence Kudlow have independently
hailed Bush and Dick Cheney as the Republican Party's most
conservative ticket since Calvin Coolidge. Accordingly,
conservatives--the same cantankerous bunch that castigated
stalwarts like Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott as apostates--have
fallen behind Bush in lockstep...."
(read
more on the evidence Chait provides) |
1 |
| BS2-01 |
Drug use |
Bush
"...“Could I pass the challenge of a
background check? My answer is absolutely,” Bush said. “Not
only could I pass the background check and the standards applied
to today’s White House, but I could have passed the background
check and the standards applied on the most stringent conditions
when my dad was President -- 15-year period.”..."
|
Jake
Tapper (Salon):
"...Under a barrage of tenacious
media inquiries, as well as polling data indicating that the
American people find the question relevant, Bush finally decided
to abandon his refuse-
to-
answer-
questions strategy. In a testy exchange with a reporter on
August 18, he said that he would be able to pass the traditional
White House background check question as to whether he'd used
drugs in the past seven years.
But that answer only raised more questions than it answered, and
amid a hail of media criticism Bush felt impelled to issue yet
another clarification the next day, extending the time frame
when he could have passed the background check to include the
time when his father was president -- "a 15-year
period." Finally, a Bush spokesperson expanded the
definition yet again, stating that Bush was saying he had not
used illegal drugs at any time since he was 28, in 1974 -- the
year he graduated from Harvard Business School and moved back to
Texas.
(The Clinton White House background check, it should be noted,
asks prospective senior officials if they have ever used illegal
drugs since the age of 18. Bush refuses to answer that
question.)..."Bush has now created this whole narrative
which could be interpreted as Clintonian obfuscation," says
William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard.
"And that chips away at this picture we've been presented
with of Bush as the white knight leading Republicans back into
the White House."..."
Also see: Jake
Tapper (Salon)
|
1 |
| BS2-02 |
Drug use |
Bush
"...It's time for some politician to stand up and say,
"Enough is enough of this." The game of trying to
force me to prove a negative and to chase down unsubstantiated
ugly rumors has got to end..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...Bush says he won't discuss what he may have done wrong,
because it may make young people think it's OK. But he has
widely discussed the fact that he drank heavily until he was
forty years old. To believe Bush didn't do drugs is to believe
the following: on principle, he won't discuss the thing he didn't
do, while discussing quite freely the thing that he did. We take
it as obvious that this makes no sense. But some in the press
pretend otherwise...
EVANS: The "Big
Question" for Gov. George W. Bush, Jr., of Texas. Governor,
there are and have been rumors—lots of them—of your possible
past use of hard drugs. Sir, is it not now in your interest to
tell us flatly that the rumors are or are not true?
GOV. BUSH: You know,
Rollie, when I first got started on this campaign I started
hearing about these ridiculous rumors. I made my mind up at that
time not to chase every single rumor that had been floated about
me...It's time for some politician to stand up and say,
"Enough is enough of this." The game of trying to
force me to prove a negative and to chase down unsubstantiated
ugly rumors has got to end.
...But, despite the artless questioning of the occasional host,
Bush is not being asked to "disprove a rumor." He is
being asked to answer a question, one which every
presidential candidate has been asked since the 1988 campaign.
The 1988 admissions by candidates Gore and Babbitt resulted from
The Question. In 1992, Candidate Clinton's famous statement that
he didn't inhale resulted from the same process. Every other
candidate in the present race has been asked the question which
Bush has been asked. No one asked them to prove their
case when they said that they didn't use drugs..."
|
2 |
| BS3-01 |
Use of focus groups/
polling |
Bush
"...said, “I
think you've got to look at how one has handled responsibility
in office, whether or not … you've got the capacity to
convince people to follow; whether or not one makes decisions
based upon sound principles; or whether or not you rely upon
polls and focus groups on how to decide what the course of
action is. We've got too much polling and focus groups going on
in Washington today. We need decisions made on sound
principles.”
..."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...Left out
was that Bush’s campaign has spent roughly $1 million on polls
and focus groups during this campaign, about equal to the Gore
campaign’s spending, according to a report by NBC News. [Oct.
6, 2000]. Indeed, Bush changed his campaign slogan from
“Compassionate Conservative” to “Real Plans for Real
People” because of poll analysis done by his campaign.
.."
Daily
Howler:
"...Weisman did introduce one new
idea—the idea that Bush has done the same things as Gore, but
just hasn't been ridiculed for it. Indeed, we were struck by
that very same thought when we read Terry Neal's piece in last
Friday's Washington Post. According to Neal, the GOP is
"planning a summer convention that minimizes attack
politics." Why has the party decided to play down attacks?
Here was one part of the background:
NEAL: Last month, the
Texas governor's campaign held focus group discussions and
concluded that Vice President Gore's biggest liability with
voters is his personality—particularly when he's in attack
mode. The information collected there as well as polling data
has persuaded the campaign to take the high road and deviate
from its original strategy, which Bush indicated in March would
include direct and frequent attacks on Gore.
Ohmigod! According to Neal, the Bush
campaign has used focus groups and polling data,
and changed the hopeful's approach! If you wanted to, you
could almost say that Bush had thus "reinvented
himself." Indeed, Neal also stated in his piece that Bush
will avoid certain issues at the convention:
NEAL: The campaign is
trying to focus the event narrowly on the issues Bush has
concentrated on since effectively wrapping up the nomination in
March: education, Social Security and Medicare, "compassion
subjects" (empowerment and revitalization), and national
defense...Notably absent from the agenda are tax cuts and
abortion.
Bush's tax cut was once "rolled
out" as a major part of his campaign...."
|
2 |
| BS4-01 |
White House guest sleepovers |
Bush
"...“I believe
they've moved that sign, ‘The buck stops here,’ from the
Oval Office desk to ‘The buck stops here’ on the Lincoln
bedroom, and that's not good for the country. It's not right. We
need to have a new look about how we conduct ourselves in
office,” Bush said.
.."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...What Bush
left out was that since he took office in 1995, he has had 203
guests stay over at the Governor’s Mansion in Austin, Texas.
More than half of them have contributed to his campaign,
amounting to $2.2 million. [The
Public I]..."
|
1 |
| BS5-01 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...In his 1999 autobiography A Charge
to Keep, Mr. Bush offers a lyrical description of his flight
training in the F-102 fighter. "I continued flying with my
unit for the next several years," he writes..."
"...His campaign biography states that
he flew with the unit until he won release
from the service in September 1973, nine months early, for
graduate school..."
|
Joe
Conason (New York Observer):
"...That simply isn’t true: Lieutenant Bush never flew
another jet after being suspended from flight duty in August
1972 for failing to take a mandated annual physical..."
Eric Alterman
(MSNBC/WLM
page 173):
"...But both claims are false.
Bush flew with the 111th for 22 months, until April 1972, and
never flew again..."
Note: Uggabugga's
table is good. Also see AWOLBush.
|
2 |
| BS5-02 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...Further along [in his 1999
autobiography] he says his military service "gave me
respect for the chain of command."..."
|
Joe
Conason (New York Observer):
"...Not enough respect, apparently, to report for duty as
ordered, since his records show that he ignored two direct
orders to do so..."
|
1 |
| BS5-03 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...claim that he vaulted ahead of the
Air Guard waiting list because he was willing to fly an
airplane, and there were openings..."
"They
were looking for pilots, and I was honored to serve.",
Governor Bush told the Dallas Morning News. [DMN9/08/99]..."
|
Democrats.com:
"...“But
Tom Hail, a historian for the Texas Air National Guard, said
that records do not show a pilot shortage in the Guard squadron
at the time. Hail, who reviewed the unit's personnel records for
a special Guard museum display on Gov. Bush's service, said
Bush's unit had 27 pilots at the time he began applying. While
that number was two short of its authorized strength, the unit
had two other pilots who were in training and another awaiting a
transfer. There was no apparent need to fast-track applicants,
he said.” [LAT 7/4/99]
“The Texas Air Guard had about 900 slots for pilots, air and
ground crew members, supervisors, technicians and support staff.
Sgt. Donald Dean Barnhart, who still serves in the Guard, said
that he kept a waiting list of about 150 applicants' names. He
said it took up to a year and a half for one name to move to the
top of the list. "Quite a few gentlemen were
wanting to get in," he recalled. For Bush, there
was no wait. He met with commander Staudt in his Houston office
and made his application--all before his graduation in June.”
[LAT, 7/4/99]
“Beckwith, Bush's spokesman, painted a different picture. He
said that the Guard needed pilots at the time and Bush was
available. "A lot of people weren't qualified" or
willing to fly, he said, so special commissions were offered to
those willing to undergo the extra training required.” [LAT
7/4/99]
“But Shoemake,
who also served as a chief of personnel in the Texas Guard from
1972 to 1980, remembers no pilot shortage. "We had so many
people coming in who were super-qualified," he said.”
[LAT 7/4/99]
“Records from his [Bush’s] military file show that in
January 1968, after inquiring about Guard admission, Mr. Bush
went to an Air Force recruiting office near Yale, where he took
and passed the test required by the Air Force for pilot
trainees. His score on the pilot aptitude section, one of five
on the test, was in the 25th percentile, the lowest allowed for
would-be fliers.” [7/4/99]..."
|
2 |
| BS5-04 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...Bush and his
campaign have said that he performed "alternative"
duty at the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron in Montgomery
from May to November 1972, while he was
working on a Senate race in Alabama..."
"...Bush has said
that he has “some recollection” of attending drills that
year, but has not been more specific..."
Bush campaign
(provided a) "...tattered
piece of attendance record (which lists no months, years, or
last name)...as evidence of attending Air National Guard
training..."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...Bush
has a one-year gap in his National Guard duty from 1972-1973
when he was supposed to have transferred from the Texas Air
National Guard to the Alabama Air National Guard. According
to the Boston Globe, “In his final 18 months of
military service in 1972 and 1973, Bush did not fly at all. And
… for a full year, there is no record that he showed up for
the periodic drills required of part-time guardsmen.” [Boston
Globe, May, 23, 2000]. Bush has said that he has “some recollection” of attending
drills that year, but has not been more specific. Under Air
National Guard rules at the time, anyone who did not report to
required drills could be inducted in the draft to serve in
Vietnam, according to the Globe. That never happened to
Bush.
The press has reported these gaps in Bush’s record, but has
not pressed the issue as a story worthy of determined pursuit or
pundit show commentary. Similarly, Bush’s implausible answers
have not led to questions from the media about Bush’s
veracity..."
Eric Alterman
(MSNBC/WLM
page 173):
"...But, the
Globe notes, Bush’s own records contradict that assertion. In
May 1972, Bush sought a permanent transfer to a postal unit in
Alabama that didn’t require weekend drills or active duty.
Guard headquarters overruled that decision. Bush did not do any
drills from May through September 1972. In September 1972, Bush
won approval to do temporary "alternative" training at
the 187th Squadron in Montgomery. He was cleared to attend
weekend drills in October and November. But two of the 187th’s
officers said Bush never appeared. One of them, retired Brig.
Gen. William Turnipseed, says he is "dead-certain he didn’t
show up." Bush, who refuses all interviews on the subject,
says he was there, but can’t remember anything he did. His
campaign can find no records to corroborate this..."
Also see Talion.com
for a copy of the report from May 1973 signed by his superiors
stating that Bush stopped flying after May 1972.
Talion.com:
"...The tattered piece of attendance record (which lists no
months, years, or last name) which the Bush campaign presented
as evidence of attending Air National Guard training is not even
from the Air National Guard. This incomplete scrap of paper is
from the Air Force Reserve punishment unit, not the Air National
Guard. (13)
Note the ARF (Air Reserve Force) listing at the top, rather than
the ANG designator, which would indicate it was from the Air
National Guard..."
Talion.com:
"...1. A September 29, 1972 Air National Guard confirming
orders “suspending
1st Lt. George W. Bush from flying status are
confirmed...Reason for Suspension: Failure to accomplish annual
medical exam.”...4. In Fall 1973, as an automatic disciplinary
action, Bush was reassigned to the Obligated Reserve Section in
Denver, because he disobeyed orders to show up for a mandatory
flight physical and therefore was unable to fulfill the last two
years of his six-year obligation as an Air National Guard jet
fighter pilot..."
Daily
Howler:
"...Andrew
Sullivan suggests that Paul Krugman
has glossed the facts of the “missing year” case. Sullivan
refers to a New York Times report of November 3, 2000. The
report directly referenced Robinson’s prior work; in it, Jo
Thomas judged that “some of [Robinson’s] concerns may be
unfounded. Documents reviewed by The Times showed that Mr. Bush
served in at least 9 of the 17 months in question.” Thomas’
short, 539-word piece was, in fact, quite sketchy. Even she
found a “seven-month gap” (April 1972 to November 1972) in
which Bush performed no service. In some ways, Thomas even
seemed a bit slick. For example, she quoted General Turnipseed
in such a way as to suggest that Bush had served in Alabama (see
Sullivan’s item today). But she failed to mention
Turnipseed’s repeated statements that Bush had not
served there..."
Also see this Daily
Howler series for a detailed examination of the above.
|
2 |
| BS5-05 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"I
can't remember what I did, but I wasn't flying because they
didn't have the same airplanes. I fulfilled my
obligations."
|
Democrats.com:
"...On
June 26th this report appeared in the Dallas
Morning News. “Campaigning Friday in Tuscaloosa, Ala., Bush
was asked about his 1972 service in that state. "I was
there on a temporary assignment and fulfilled my weekends at one
period of time," he said. "I made up some missed
weekends." "I can't remember what I did, but I wasn't
flying because they didn't have the same airplanes. I fulfilled
my obligations."
The
Truth
He was no longer
flying because he had been suspended in August of 1972 for
failure to “accomplish” a required medical exam. [Boston
Globe, 5/23/00] (Suspension document at http://www.cis.net/~coldfeet/grounded.gif)
Bush was suspended from flying on August 1, 1972, prior to his
request for the transfer to the187th at Montgomery Alabama,
September 5, 1972. Bush did not receive permission
until September 15, which was close to six weeks after his
suspension from flying.
Another
question is raised by the fact that he cannot remember what he
did for the Air National Guard in Alabama, despite the fact that
28 years later he still remembers the specifics of his work
there on the campaign of William Blount as cited in a July 22,
2000 New York Times article. “In an interview 28 years later,
Mr. Bush remembered the numbers. "We all teamed together
and helped Red get about 36 percent of the vote," he said
with a short laugh, "in spite of the fact that Nixon had
gotten 72 percent of the vote. The ticket-splitting was
phenomenal."”..."
|
1 |
| BS5-06 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...As for Mr. Bush’s curious failure
to take the annual physical in 1972, the only excuse he has
offered is that he was in Alabama working on a Republican Senate
campaign and couldn’t get back to Houston for a checkup by his
personal physician..."
|
Joe
Conason (New York Observer):
"...That, too, is blatantly untrue. For as Mr. Bush surely
knows—having undergone such examinations in previous
years—only a certified Air Force flight surgeon may conduct a
pilot physical..."
RealChange:
"...his story also changed on why he refused to take a
medical exam -- including a drug test - in 1972. (The refusal
ended Bush's flying career.) His staff first claimed that he
didn't take the physical because he was in Alabama and his
personal physician was in Houston. But flight physicals can be
administered only by certified Air Force flight surgeons, and
there were surgeons assigned at the time to Maxwell Air Force
Base in Montgomery, where Bush was living. His staff now admits
that that explanation was "wrong", without saying
where it came from or what the real reason was..."
|
1 |
| BS5-07 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...[claimed that] he tried to volunteer for service in Vietnam
"to relieve active-duty pilots."..."
|
Joe
Conason (New York Observer):
"...The twists and turns of Mr. Bush’s military record
are too complex for an exhaustive analysis in this space. Among
the questionable claims in his book is that he tried to
volunteer for service in Vietnam "to relieve active-duty
pilots." In a more candid mood in 1998, however, he told a
reporter for The Fort Worth Star-Telegram, "I
don’t want to play like I was somebody out there marching [to
war] when I wasn’t. It was either Canada or the service and I
was headed into the service."..."
RealChange:
"...He has stated on several occasions that he did not want
to be an infantryman, and acknowledges that he came to oppose
the war itself. He claims that he joined the guard to fly
planes, and would have been happy to go to Vietnam, but ignores
the obvious choice of the Air Force or the Navy -- which his
dad, a genuine war hero, joined. Furthermore, when he signed up
for the Guard, he checked a box saying "Do not volunteer
for overseas service." Later, he made a perfunctory
application to transfer to a program called "Palace
Alert", which dispatched F-102 pilots to Europe or the Far
East -- and just occasionally Vietnam -- for 3 or 6 month
assignments. But Bush was not nearly qualified, as he must have
known, and was immediately turned down, and the F-102 not used
overseas after June, 1970 in any case..."
|
1 |
| BS5-08 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...Bush has said no one to his knowledge helped him get into the
National Guard. “I asked to become a pilot,” Bush said. “I
met the qualifications, and ended up becoming an F-102 pilot,”
The Associated Press reported. Bush insisted that he knew
of no special treatment. [AP, July 5, 1999]
..."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...But the
record indicates that, despite having the lowest acceptable
score for entry, Bush jumped over other young men waiting to get
into the National Guard. Other accounts suggest that a “good
friend” of Bush’s father, George H.W. Bush, then a
congressman from Houston who supported the war, weighed in with
Ben Barnes, the Texas Speaker of the House, to arrange a slot
for George W. Bush. [The Guardian (U.K.), July 29, 1999]. Sometime in late 1967 or early 1968, Barnes “personally
asked the top official of the Texas Air National Guard to help
George W. Bush obtain a pilot's slot in a Guard fighter
squadron,” The Washington Post reported. [Sept. 21,
1999]. On Sept. 27, 1999, Barnes submitted a sworn statement
that he helped Bush by contacting Brig. Gen. James M. Rose..."
RealChange:
"...On May 27, 1968, George Bush Jr.
was 12 days away from losing his student draft deferment, at a
time when 350 Americans a week were dying in combat. The
National Guard, seen by many as the most respectable way to
avoid Vietnam, had a huge waiting list -- a year and a half in
Texas, over 100,000 men nationwide. Yet Bush and his family
friends pulled strings, and the young man was admitted the same
day he applied, regardless of any waiting list.
Bush's unit commander, Col. "Buck"
Staudt, was so excited about his VIP recruit that he staged a
special ceremony for the press so he could have his picture
taken administering the oath (even though the official oath had
been given by a captain earlier.)...Of
course, it later came out in court that a close Bush friend,
Simon Adger, had asked Barnes to get Bush Jr. into the Guard,
and that Barnes did so, via General Rose...
George Bush Jr. admits that he knew Adger socially at the time,
and further admits that he lobbied Col. "Buck" Staudt,
the commander of the VIP unit Bush joined. Staudt claims that
he, not General Rose (who he later replaced), was the one who
made the decision on admissions anyway. Bush Jr. admits that he
met Staudt in late 1967, during Christmas vacation of his senior
year, called him later, and -- in Bush's words -- "found
out what it took to apply." When
asked how Bush came to call Staudt, his spokeswoman Karen Hughes
said he "heard from friends while he was home over the
Christmas break that ... Colonel Staudt was the person to
contact." She says that Bush doesn't recall who those
"friends" were. But we know that Sid Adger was also a
friend of Staudt's, served with him on the Houston Chamber of
Commerce's Aviation Committee, and in 1967 held a luncheon
honoring Gen. Staudt and his unit for winning an Air Force
commendation. In fact, both of Adger's sons also joined General
Staudt's unit, in 1966 and 1968 respectively..."
|
1 |
| BS5-09 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
Changing reasons for why he was suspended
|
Democrats.com:
"...Three
different stories on why he was suspended.
Story
#1) "Bush's
campaign aides have said he did not take the physical because he
was in Alabama and his personal physician was in Houston."
[Boston Globe 5/23/00]...
In
fact as the Boston Globe goes on to state "flight physicals
can be administered only by certified Air Force flight surgeons,
and some were assigned at the time to Maxwell Air Force Base in
Montgomery, where Bush was living."
Story
#2) Then in June, campaign officials told the London Times
Bush did not technically need to take his flight physical.
"As he was not flying, there was no reason for him to take
the flight physical exam," according to campaign spokesman
Don Bartlett.
Any
suggestion that he had simply decided to “give up flying”
prior to his suspension, with two years remaining on his
commitment and nearly one million dollars (in real terms)
invested in his training is not plausible. It is not
up to an Air National Guard pilot to decide whether or not he
“intends” to fly.
“If he had come back to Houston, I would have kept him flying
the 102 until he got out” said retired Major Bobby W. Hodges
[Boston Glove 5/23/00]
Story
#3) In the same article, Bush campaign spokesman Dan
Bartlett told the newspaper that Bush was aware back then that
he would be suspended for missing his medical exam, but had no
choice because he had applied for a transfer from Houston to
Alabama and his paperwork hadn't caught up with him. "It
was just a question of following the bureaucratic procedure of
the time," Bartlett said. "He knew the suspension
would have to take place."
The
exam was required to be completed in the three months preceding
his birthday, July 6, 1972. A three month window seems adequate
to avoid being suspended from flying.
So
which is it: his family physician, he didn’t have to take the
exam, or a bureaucratic snafu?..."
|
1 |
| BS6-01 |
Drunken driving
arrest/
conviction |
Bush
"..."I asked him if he'd ever been
arrested after 1968," when the wreath incident took place,
Slater recalled. "And [Bush] said, 'No.'"
..."
|
Jake
Tapper (Salon) via RealChange:
"...he had been arrested for driving while intoxicated in
Maine in 1976, at the age of 30...In the
midst of Bush's gubernatorial reelection effort, Slater reported
that while in college, Bush had been arrested for stealing a
Christmas wreath from a New Haven, Conn., hotel. Cornering Bush
in the press room of the State Capitol in Austin, Texas, after a
press conference, Slater pressed Bush on his arrest record.
"I asked him if he'd ever been arrested after 1968,"
when the wreath incident took place, Slater recalled. "And
he said, 'No.'"
Slater emphasized the context of the conversation, however, and
his gut feeling now that Bush was on the brink of disclosing the
1976 drunken-driving arrest to him. "When he said the word
'no,' clearly he wasn't telling the truth," Slater said.
But, Slater said, he then asked Bush if "had he ever been
arrested before 1968, and he said, 'Well ...,' and I felt he may
have been ready to correct what he had just said, but [Bush
spokeswoman] Karen Hughes stepped in and stopped the
interview."
"
Note RealChange:
"...Before 1968, Bush was arrested for theft and vandalism
in college..."
|
1 |
| BS6-02 |
Drunken driving
arrest/
conviction |
Bush
"...Bush: "No. I pled -- you
know, I said I was wrong and I ..." Reporter: "In
court? "
Bush: No, there was no court. I went to the police
station. I said, "I'm wrong."..."
|
RealChange:
"...That is clearly a lie, as you can see on this
court document showing his court hearing a month later. In
fact, it was a man also in court for DUI the same day who
revealed Bush' arrest..."
|
1 |
| BS6-03 |
Drunken driving
arrest/
conviction |
Bush
"...Bush decided to serve jury duty in
1996, during his first year as governor...Then he found himself
on a trial for drunk driving...The night before the trial,
Bush's lawyer asked the defense attorney to dismiss him, because
"it would be improper for a governor to sit on a criminal
case in which he could later be asked to grant
clemency."..."
|
RealChange:
"...In another evasion, Bush decided to serve jury duty in
1996, during his first year as governor. On his questionairre,
he simply left blank the questions about prior arrests and
trials. Then he found himself on a trial for drunk driving,
where every juror is eventually asked about prior convictions
for drunk driving. The night before the trial, Bush's lawyer
asked the defense attorney to dismiss him, because "it
would be improper for a governor to sit on a criminal case in
which he could later be asked to grant clemency." It's a
silly argument, because that problem exists with any criminal
trial and Bush had already decided to serve on a jury, but the
defense attorney obliged and excused him before direct
questioning of jurors began...."
|
1 |
| BS6-04 |
Drunken driving
arrest/
conviction |
Hughes for Bush
"...He has been very forthcoming with the
American people that he made mistakes as a youth..."
|
Issues2000:
"...Bush
aides said he had not disclosed the [drunk driving] incident
previously out of concern for his twin daughters. “He has
always been very forthcoming in acknowledging that he drank too
much in the past, before he quit drinking 14 years ago,” his
communications director said. “He had made a decision as a
father that he did not want to set that bad example for his
daughters or for any other children,” she said.
She was asked if
she would have considered it acceptable for President Clinton to
have denied involvement with Monica Lewinsky out concern for his
daughter Chelsea. “The only time the governor was directly
asked if he’d ever been arrested for drinking and driving and
he replied, and I quote, ‘I do not have a perfect record,’
” she replied.
She added, “He has been very forthcoming with the American
people that he made mistakes as a youth.” When asked if 30,
Bush’s age at the time, qualifies as youthful, she said, “It
was before he was married. It was before he had
children.”
Source: Mike Allen and Dan Balz, Washington Post, p. A1 Nov 4,
2000..."
|
1 |
| BS7-01 |
Texas funeral home
case |
Bush
"...The Texas governor and front-runner
for the GOP presidential nomination sought to avoid testifying
in the case by filing an affidavit swearing he "had no
conversations with [SCI] officials, agents, or representatives
concerning the investigation or any dispute arising from
it."..."
|
Robert
Bryce and Anthony York (Salon):
"...The affidavit also stated that Bush never spoke with
the Texas Funeral Service Commission about the investigation,
and that Bush had "no personal knowledge of relevant facts
of the investigation nor do I have any personal knowledge of
relevant facts concerning any dispute arising from this
investigation." But in a forthcoming story by Newsweek
reporter Michael Isikoff, Johnnie B. Rogers, attorney for SCI,
said he and Waltrip met with Bush's chief of staff and campaign
manager, Joe Allbaugh, on April 15 to hand deliver a letter
demanding an end to the investigation.
Bush stuck his head into the meeting, Rogers told Isikoff, and
said, "Hey Bobby, are those people still messing with
you?" When Waltrip indicated that they were, Bush asked
Rogers, "Hey, Johnnie B. Are you taking care of him?"
Rogers replied, "I'm doing my best,
Governor."...Meanwhile, the silence out of Austin is
deafening. The normally gregarious Rogers has apparently been
muzzled, and is not speaking to the media. He told Salon News
that all questions about the matter should be referred to SCI
spokesman Bill Miller. Neither Bush's campaign press team nor
his gubernatorial press office returned numerous calls seeking
comment..."
Robert
Bryce (Salon):
"...The contempt motion puts the spotlight on Bush's sworn
affidavit, filed on Aug. 5, in which he said that he has
"had no conversations with SCI officials, agents or
representatives" about the state's investigation...Since
the affidavit was filed, Bush's flat denial has been
contradicted several times, even by Bush himself. According to
reporters who were with Bush in Iowa last week, when Bush was
asked if he talked to Waltrip about the investigation, Bush
responded, "I did not. I had only a brief exchange with him
that lasted only a few seconds." Bush's press secretary,
Linda Edwards, has also described their meeting as an
"exchange." The American Heritage Dictionary defines
the word "conversation" thusly: "an informal
spoken exchange."..."
|
1 |
| BS8-01 |
Knowing his own
mind |
Bush
said "..."I
do not need to take your pulse before I know my own mind,"..."
|
ABC
News:
"...“What you’re trying to get me to do is to express
the will of the people of South Carolina,” Bush said, dodging
an attempt by the moderator of the GOP presidential debate to
pin him down on a divisive, racially charged issue. The crowd at
the rowdy forum tried to shout down moderator Brian Williams, an
MSNBC anchor, as he pressed Bush to take a position on the flag.
Bush refused to bite. “I don’t believe it’s the role of
someone from outside South Carolina and someone running for
president to come into this state and tell the people of South
Carolina what to do with their business when it comes to the
flag,” Bush said..."
Compassiongate:
The bottomline is why does one need to take the pulse of people
in SC to state one's personal view on whether or not
something is right?
|
1 |
| BS9-01 |
His so-called
contempt for Washington |
Bush
Claimed he was not like the standard pols from
D.C.
|
Daily
Howler:
"...Last week, for example, after Bush explained how much
he despised D.C. ways, a purloined memo revealed an odd fact:
those Washington lobbyists the governor hated were being asked
to go to Iowa, to work on Dub's straw poll effort. But only Jim
Drinkard dared to hint it: Darling Bush seemed to be saying one
thing, and doing exactly the other..."
|
1 |
| BS9-02 |
His so-called
contempt for Washington |
Bush
said "...I’ve never lived in Washington
in my life..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...The first part of Bush’s answer—“I’ve never
lived in Washington in my life”— was oddly unresponsive to
Bloom’s question, but as a soundbite, it made perfect sense.
Bush was painting himself as an “outsider,” as almost all
candidates try to do...
But Bush’s statement was more than a stretch; his statement to
Bloom was blatantly false. In 1987 and 1988, Bush had spent what
the Washington Post later called “an 18-month stint in
Washington as a full-time paid aide to his father’s 1988
[presidential] campaign.” Nor was this part of his life a
secret. For example, in Eric Pooley’s profile of Bush in the
6/21/99 Time (released 6/13), Pooley described how, in
1986, Bush “sold his ailing company [Spectrum] for a
miraculous profit and moved his family to Washington, where he
worked on his father’s 1988 presidential campaign.”..."
|
1 |
| BS10-01 |
Changing the
"tone" and
being against negative campaigning |
Bush
"...made as a
centerpiece of his campaign the theme that he would change the
“tone” of Washington and restore “dignity” to the White
House..."
also indicated that he
was against negative campaigning
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...Yet, during the Republican
primaries, the Bush campaign targeted Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.,
for personal attacks. By fall 1999, McCain, who spent five years
in a North Vietnamese prisoner of war camp, had narrowed
Bush’s lead and the Bush assault began.
..Bush’s negative attacks intensified after McCain won the New
Hampshire primary...As McCain remained a threat, Bush’s
campaign ran a misleading ad attacking the senator for not
supporting breast cancer research...After
securing the Republican nomination, Bush renewed his pledge to
run a positive general election campaign.
But again, the promise lasted only until the governor found
himself lagging in the polls. Bush again broke his promise,
unleashing his campaign to tear down Gore’s character,
ironically, targeting Gore’s credibility.
The news media observed the changed tactics but took little
notice of how Bush was violating his own pledge..."
Jake
Tapper (Salon):
"...After Bush lost the Feb. 1 New
Hampshire primary to McCain, he and his team made the tactical
decision to get
ugly in South Carolina. In the weeks leading up to the South
Carolina primary on Feb. 19, McCain suffered one of the dirtiest
personal smear campaigns in modern American political history.
"We play it different down here," one of Bush's top
South Carolina advisors told Time magazine in February.
"We're not dainty, if you get my drift. We're used to
playin' rough."
Indeed. Push polls attacked McCain's personal life and
exaggerated his role in the Keating savings and loan scandal.
Leaflets slammed his wife, Cindy, for her past addiction to
painkillers. An e-mail from a Bob
Jones University professor accused McCain of fathering
children out of wedlock. A mysterious public action committee in
favor of the Confederate
flag -- called "Keep it Flying" -- sprang up
overnight and slammed McCain in 250,000 leaflets.
.."
|
2
(1 for lying compassion about
what he would/ would not do and 1 for misleading and
offensive personal attack ads against McCain
compassionate ads) |
| BS11-01 |
Harken |
Bush
"...Bush explicitly said, during the
[Ann] Richards debate, that he had been “exonerated” by the
SEC’s [Harken] probe..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...Bush’s campaign had asked the SEC to issue a
statement about the matter. In a letter to Bush’s lawyer, the
SEC said, “the investigation has been terminated as to the
conduct of Mr. Bush, and…at this time, no enforcement action
is contemplated with respect to him.” But the letter also said
that this “must in no way be construed as indicating that the
party has been exonerated or that no action may ultimately
result.” Despite this, Bush explicitly said, during the
Richards debate, that he had been “exonerated” by the
SEC’s probe. Why, you could almost say he embellished the
facts!..."
|
1 |
| BS11-02 |
Harken |
Bush
during
Campaign 2000: "..."In my administration, we will
ask not only what is legal but what is right," Bush said.
"...Not just what the lawyers allow, but what the public
deserves. In my administration, we'll make it clear there is a
controlling legal authority of conscience."..."
|
Eric Alterman
(MSNBC/WLM
page 172):
"...As
a director of Harken Energy Corporation, Bush failed to comply
with SEC regulations regarding the legal deadlines for revealing
his purchasing and selling of the company’s stock. As a
result, Bush profited by concealing the fact that he was buying
and selling hundreds of thousands of shares of stock..."
Compassiongate:
Regardless of whether the sale itself was legal or illegal, I only choose to apply to Mr. Bush the standards he seeks to apply
to the rest of us.
|
1 |
| BS12-01 |
Guilt by association |
Bush
"...A few weeks ago I visited Bob Jones
University in South Carolina to address its students and outline
the reasons I am seeking the presidency. Some have taken and
mistaken this visit as a sign that I approve of the
anti-Catholic and racially divisive views associated with that school...Criticism
should be expected in any political campaign. What no American
should expect and what I will not tolerate is guilt by
association..."
|
MWO:
"...As is common practice
during his stump speeches, Bush took a veiled jab at President
Clinton by asserting that the Monica Lewinsky scandal has
sullied the White House, and that he was the candidate best
suited to "usher in a new era."
"I think you can judge the nature of a man by the company
his keeps..."
Source
(Bush in Blue Ash, OH)
Mr. Keyes and Mr. Bush
decried what they perceived as the nation's moral decay, with
Mr. Bush declaring, "You can judge the nature of a man by
the company he keeps,'' and noting that his "priority is
faith, family and this great country called America.''
Source
(Bush in Aiken, SC)
"I
know you can judge the character of a man by the company he
keeps," said Bush.
Source
(Bush in Oakland, PA)..."
|
1 |
| BS13-01 |
Campaign claim |
Bush
In a mailing he cited "...a New York
Times Magazine article to suggest its support, "He (Bush)
has a clear and compelling idea in his mind of where he wants to
take the nation."..."
|
BAND:
"...CNN's "Inside
Politics" pointed out in August 1999 that the actual quote
was, "Bush says, if he runs, it will be because he has a
clear and compelling idea in his mind of where he wants to take
the nation." The truth was, as Bernard Shaw said,
"It was Bush endorsing Bush." (Salon.com, Oct. 5,
2000)..."
|
1 |
EXTRAORDINARY
COMPASSION IN FLORIDA <go back to the top>
Compassionate conservatism revealed in one of its worst
best forms.
Compassion Con credits total = 20
| # |
Topic |
Gov.
Bush or his team's
Compassionate statement |
Some Uncompassionate Facts |
Compassion
Con Credits |
| FL1-01 |
Conceding the
election |
Bush
campaign
"...Bush aides and supporters suggested
that Gore concede the state and the White House if the initial
recount and next week's certification show Bush ahead. "We
certainly hope that in the best interest of the country the vice
president will think carefully about his talk of lawsuits and
endless recounts," said Bush's spokeswoman, Karen Hughes..."
|
Sam
Parry (Consortium News):
"...In
the days before the Nov. 7 election, Republicans feared that
Vice President Al Gore might win the Electoral College while
Texas Gov. George W. Bush could win the national popular vote...That
could allow Gore to amass the 270 electoral votes needed for
winning the presidency while blocking a Gore plurality in the
popular vote.
To stop Gore under those circumstances, advisers to the Bush
campaign weighed the possibility of challenging the legitimacy
of a popular-vote loser gaining the White House. "The one
thing we don't do is roll over -- we fight," said a Bush
aide, according to an article by Michael Kramer in the New
York Daily News on Nov. 1, a week before the election. The
article reported that "the core of the emerging Bush
strategy assumes a popular uprising, stoked by the Bushies
themselves, of course. In league with the campaign -- which is
preparing talking points about the Electoral College's essential
unfairness -- a massive talk-radio operation would be
encouraged." "We'd have ads, too," said a Bush
aide, "and I think you can count on the media to fuel the
thing big-time. Even papers that supported Gore might turn
against him because the will of the people will have been
thwarted." The Bush strategy to challenge the Electoral
College went even further. "Local business leaders will be
urged to lobby their customers, the clergy will be asked to
speak up for the popular will and Team Bush will enlist as many
Democrats as possible to scream as loud as they can," the
article said. "You think 'Democrats for Democracy' would be
a catchy term for them?" asked a Bush adviser.
The Bush strategy also
would target the members of the Electoral College, the 538
electors who are picked by the campaigns and state party
organizations to go to Washington for what is normally a
ceremonial function. Many of the electors are not legally bound
to a specific candidate. Another article describing the
Republican thinking appeared in The Boston Herald on Nov.
3. It also quoted Republican sources outlining plans to rally
public sentiment against Gore’s election if he won the
Electoral College but lost the popular vote. “The Bush camp,
sources said, would likely challenge the legitimacy of a Gore
win, casting it as an affront to the people’s will and
branding the Electoral College as an antiquated relic,” said
the article by Andrew Miga. “One
informal Bush adviser, who declined to be named, predicted
Republicans would likely benefit from a storm of public outrage
if Bush won the popular vote but was denied the presidency,”
the article said. The article quoted the Bush adviser as saying:
“That’s what America is all about, isn’t it. I’m sure we
would make a strong case.”
The
Nov. 7 election turned out differently, however. Gore
appears to be the popular-vote winner by a margin now standing
at about 200,000 votes nationwide, while Bush contends that he
is the Electoral College winner because he holds a tiny lead in
Florida, which would put him over the top in electoral votes.
Gone is the Republican talk of challenging the Electoral College
as an anti-democratic relic. Gone is the principled stand in
defense of the expressed will of the American people. Gone is
the outrage over a popular-vote winner – now apparently Al
Gore – being “denied the presidency.” Instead, the Bush
campaign is denouncing the Gore campaign even for questioning
voting irregularities in Florida, though these acknowledged
errors likely cost Gore a clear majority in Florida, too..." |
2 |
| FL2-01 |
Impact of election
indecision |
Baker for
Bush
"...argued that a continued struggle over
the presidential election would jeopardize America's standing in
the world. By November 14, he was tying it as well to the
stability of American financial markets..."
|
Win
McCormack (The Nation) via WLM:
"...Former Secretary of State Warren Christopher, Baker's
equivalent in the Gore camp and someone no doubt unfamiliar with
the writings of Foucault (and therefore not having the term discourse
at his disposal), referred to Baker's argument about America's
standing in the world as a "self-serving myth," and
Baker did not raise this canard again. Neither did he again
raise the matter of endangering US financial markets..."
Quest:
"...Christopher brushed that claim aside. ``I don't see any
threat at the moment,'' he said, adding that America always has
``this period of interregnum'' when administrations change..."
|
1 |
| FL3-01 |
Gore and recounts/
lawsuits |
Baker for
Bush
"...attacked the Gore campaign for
attempting to "unduly prolong the country's national
presidential election," introducing the phrases
"endless challenges" and "unending legal
wrangling"..."
|
Win
McCormack (The Nation) via WLM:
"...introducing the phrases "endless challenges"
and "unending legal wrangling" when the election
dispute was all of three days old (CG emphasis)...The
next day, November 11, at a press conference announcing that the
Bush campaign had filed suit in the US District Court for the
Southern District of Florida to block the manual recounts
requested by the Gore campaign, thus becoming the first of the
two campaigns to initiate "legal wrangling" (a number
of private lawsuits related to the election had already been
filed but none yet by the Gore campaign itself, something Baker
took pains to submerge)..."
Win
McCormack (The Nation):
"...It could be said that the Gore effort in Florida
foundered in a number of ways and places, two of which were
certainly Palm Beach County and Miami-Dade County. In Palm Beach
County, in the words of the Los Angeles Times,
"Republicans crushed the Democrats." There was more
than one reason that the Palm Beach canvassing board missed the
new November 26 certification deadline (when Katherine Harris
certified Bush as having won by 537 votes), but here is how the Los
Angeles Times summarized what happened: "Endless
delays, false starts and court challenges by Republicans meant
the full recount didn't begin until Friday, November 17."
In Miami-Dade, the county with the largest voting population in
the state of Florida (and the largest black vote), Republicans
succeeded in preventing manual recounting from taking place at
all..."
[CG NOTE- this was prevented by the
organized rioting described below]
|
4 |
| FL4-01 |
1960 election |
Baker for Bush
"...said Republicans had twice in the
past 40 years decided against challenging closely contested
elections. In the case of Vice President Richard Nixon in 1960,
and President Gerald R. Ford in 1976, he said the two men ``put
the country's interests first.''..."
|
Gerald
Posner (Salon):
"...One of the most oft-repeated
myths in the aftermath of the current presidential election
disputes is the claim that Vice President Al Gore should behave
more like Richard Nixon, who is cited frequently for having
graciously decided not to pursue legal remedies in response to
possible voter fraud that might have cost him the 1960 election
with John Kennedy. But the notion that Nixon graciously exited
is just false.
The 1960 race was unquestionably close...Nixon was worried about
how to challenge the vote and still not be branded in history as
a "sore loser." Although he would later claim that
President Eisenhower encouraged him to contest the election
outcome, that was not true, as the outgoing president withdrew
his support for any challenge within a day of the vote. Yet,
contrary to modern memory, Nixon and his Republican allies still
mounted a massive vote challenge...
It is true that Nixon did quickly concede the election to
Kennedy. And while he was careful not to put a public imprimatur
on the concerted Republican effort to challenge the election
results, he privately not only authorized it, but actively
encouraged it.
A conservative journalist and close Nixon friend, Earl Mazo, of
the New York Herald Tribune, launched a press frenzy over
possible voter fraud. (He was later Nixon's official
biographer.) And not only did Republican senators like Thruston
Morton ask for recounts in 11 states just three days after the
election, but Nixon aides Bob Finch and Len Hall personally did
field checks of votes in almost a dozen states.
The Republicans obtained recounts, involved U.S. Attorneys and
the FBI, and even impaneled grand juries in their quest to get a
different election result. A slew of lawsuits were filed by
Republicans, and unsuccessful appeals to state election
commissions routinely followed. However, all their efforts
failed to uncover any significant wrongdoing..."
Also see David
Greenberg (Slate):
"...Another man, too, believed Nixon was
robbed: Nixon. At a 1960 Christmas party, he was heard greeting
guests, "We won but they stole it from us." Nixon
nursed the grudge for years, and when he was criticized for his
Watergate crimes he would cite the Kennedys' misdeeds as
precedent. He may have felt JFK's supposed theft entitled him to
cheat in 1972. It's an interesting hypothetical: If no pall had
been cast over the 1960 election, would Watergate have
happened?..."
|
1 |
| FL5-01 |
Manual recounts |
Baker
for Bush
"...The manual vote count sought by the Gore campaign would not be
more accurate than an automated count. Indeed, it would be less
fair and less accurate. Human error, individual subjectivity
and decisions to "determine the voter's intent" would
replace precision machinery in tabulating millions of small
marks and fragile hole punches. There would be countless
opportunities for the ballots to be subject to a whole host of
risks. The potential for mischief would exist to a far
greater degree than in the automated count and recount that
these very ballots have already been subjected to. It is
precisely...for these reasons that our democracy over the years
has moved increasingly from hand counting of votes to machine
counting. Machines are neither Republicans nor Democrats--and
therefore can be neither consciously nor unconsciously biased.
[Emphasis added.]..."
Bush (team)
"..."Machine counts are accurate.
Let's not forget, we've had three of them," said Bush
spokesman Tucker Eskew. "What on Earth rationale is there
for going to a less accurate accounting, other than to come up
with a different result?"..."
|
Win
McCormack (The Nation) via WLM:
"...Manual recounting is the method used by the United
Nations for settling disputed elections around the globe, and it
is also countenanced by the United States when our
representatives get involved in observing the resolution of
electoral conflicts in other nations. A majority of American
states either mandate or permit manual recounting when the
differential between the machine vote totals for opposing
candidates is within a certain margin. Candidate Bush, while
governor, had signed just such a bill in Texas that established
the same "intent of the voter" standard set by
Florida. Until this particular situation in Florida arose,
requiring this particular discourse, no Republican
politician I am aware of had ever risen to denounce manual
recounting (on the contrary, any number of Republican
politicians had taken successful advantage of manual recount
provisions), nor have I found any literature on the subject that
appeared in the conservative journals. Moreover, the Bush camp
gladly accepted the results of manual recounts in Florida when
those went in their favor, as the results did in Seminole
County, and they had considered plans to contest machine results
in Iowa, Wisconsin, New Mexico and Oregon if things did not go
their way in Florida. Manufacturers of the punch-card voting
machinery used in Florida were also on record as saying that
hand counting was a more accurate method of gauging votes than
using their machines...
what was Baker saying, in essence? That it is impossible for
human beings to hand count votes accurately and honestly, citing
as reasons the inevitability of "human error" (machine
error is obviously to be preferred), the danger posed by
"individual subjectivity," the "potential for
mischief" (read, deliberate cheating by Democratic
canvassing boards) and even the possibility of people being not
only consciously but "unconsciously biased"; at the
same time he exalted the superiority of "precise"
machines over humans--even machines as grievously and laughably
flawed as those that produced the "dimpled,"
"pregnant" and "hanging" chads...It is safe
to say that James Baker probably did not realize that he was
challenging, and perhaps fatally undermining, core conservative
doctrine..."
Daily
Howler:
"...Bush spokesmen have said this all week long
(contradicting what Kelly himself said). But two days ago, in
Kelly's own paper, a reporter revealed an intriguing point. He
described the rules that states maintain for the manual recount
of punch-card ballots:
PETER SLEVIN (11/13): [A]s
county canvassing boards go about the arduous process [in
Florida], at least one appears to be adhering to standards
stricter than those in some states, including Texas, that put
their rules in writing.
Slevin was describing the Texas law on
hand recounts which Bush himself had signed. He described the
Lone Star standards:
SLEVIN: For example, Texas
allows ballots to be counted if light shines through the punch
hole—the so-called sunlight test abandoned by the Palm Beach
County canvassing board Saturday over the objections of
Democrats...
Texas, Michigan and Kentucky are among the states that specify
rules for examining punch ballots by hand. They set out various
tests, including holding up the ballot to see if a light shines
through and inspecting the chad, the tiny part of the ballot
that would fall away if the ballot were properly punched.
In Texas, a ballot is counted if one of four conditions are met:
if light shines through, if two corners of the chad are
detached, if the indentation is clear enough or if the ballot
reflects "by other means" a clear intent to chose a
candidate.
In other words, Bush signed a law which
permits procedures more liberal than the ones his spokesmen now
denounce. But, by the present rules of the press corps' game, no
one engages in the ugly name-calling we've seen from the Post's
Twin Hysterics. No one has taken to the Post's op-ed page to
call the governor a ruthless dissembler..."
|
3 |
| FL5-02 |
Manual recounts |
Cheney (and
others) for Bush
claiming (comparing Florida to Texas) that it
is "very different kind of a situation in terms of a manual
count. You don't have the kind of problems you have with regard
to the punch-card ballots where you're trying to sort out
between hanging chads and pregnant chads, all of the problems
you've seen in connection with Florida. It's a very different
situation..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...Cheney was clearly right on one thing—there are a
limited number of Texas counties which use the punch-card
ballots. But according to Slevin, Texas law explicitly says how
those punch-cards should be recounted. Here's what his article
said:
SLEVIN: Palm Beach
[County] announced it would not accept "pregnant" or
"dimpled" chads that show an indentation but no
evidence of being detached from the ballot, while Texas law
allows a ballot to be counted if canvassers see an indentation
that shows "a clearly ascertainable intent on the part of
the voter to vote."
If Slevin is right, then Cheney turned the
facts on their head. It is Texas law that allows
"pregnant" and "dimpled" chads to be counted
as votes. The Florida counties had set stricter rules for
recounting. Here again are the Texas standards as reported by
Slevin on Monday:
SLEVIN: Texas, Michigan
and Kentucky are among the states that specify rules for
examining punch ballots by hand. They set out various tests,
including holding up the ballot to see if a light shines through
and inspecting the chad, the tiny part of the ballot that would
fall away if a hole were properly punched.
In Texas, a ballot
is counted if one of four conditions are met: if light shines
through, if two corners of the chad are detached, if the
indentation is clear enough or if the ballot reflects "by
other means" a clear intent to choose a candidate..." |
1 |
| FL5-03 |
Manual recounts |
Bush
"...Angered by the
court's ruling that Florida law permits hand recounts, Bush
accused the court of using "the bench to change Florida's
election laws and usurp the authority of Florida's election
officials."..."
|
Sam
Parry (Consortium News):
"...The
Republican presidential nominee then stated that "writing
laws is the duty of the legislature; administering laws is the
duty of the executive branch." Bush
left out the third component of the U.S. system, a fact taught
to every American child in grade-school civics class -- that it
is the duty of the judiciary to interpret the laws. It is also
the responsibility of the courts to resolve differences between
parties under the law..." |
1 |
| FL6-01 |
Florida
riots |
Bush
campaign
speaking about the
court-ordered recounts (from Eric Alterman, WLM
page 181): "...If citizens of the United States are voluntarily
objecting to the process where the rules change (CG emphasis),
and where Democratic officials take these ballots behind closed
doors where they can't be observers, I think American citizens
are entitled to do that sort of thing..."
CN:
"..."Staffers who joined the effort say there has been
an air of mystery to the operation. 'To tell you the truth,
nobody knows who is calling the shots,' says one aide...."
"...On
Nov. 25, the Bush campaign issued “talking points” to
justify the Miami protest, calling it “fitting, proper” and
blaming the canvassing board for the disruptions. “The board
made a series of bad decisions and the reaction to it was
inevitable and well justified,” the Bush campaign
said...."
|
Sam
Parry (Consortium News):
"...After the Miami “Brooks Brothers Riot” – named
after the protesters’ preppie clothing – no government
action was taken beyond the police rescuing several Democrats
who were surrounded and roughed up by the rioters. While no
legal charges were filed against the Republicans, newly released
documents show that at least a half dozen of the publicly
identified rioters were paid by Bush’s recount committee [CG
emphasis]. The
payments to the Republican activists are documented in hundreds
of pages of Bush committee records – released grudgingly to
the Internal Revenue Service last month, 19 months after the
36-day recount battle ended....The documents show that the Bush
organization put on the payroll about 250 staffers, spent about
$1.2 million to fly operatives to Florida and elsewhere, and
paid for hotel bills adding up to about $1 million. To add
flexibility to the travel arrangements, a fleet of corporate
jets was assembled, including planes owned by Enron Corp., then
run by Bush backer Kenneth Lay, and Halliburton Co., where Dick
Cheney had served as chairman and chief executive officer...Jake
Tapper’s book on the recount battle, Down and Dirty,
provides a list of 12 Republican operatives who took part in the
Miami riot. Half of those individuals received payments from the
Bush recount committee, according to the IRS records...Three of
the Miami protesters are now members of Bush’s White House
staff, the Miami Herald reported last month. They include
Schlapp, who is now a special assistant to the president;
Malphrus, who is now deputy director of the president’s
Domestic Policy Council; and Joel Kaplan, another special
assistant to the president. [See Miami Herald, July 14,
2002]...The Bush committee records show, too, that Bush’s
operation paid for the hotel where the Republican protesters
celebrated after the Miami riot at a Thanksgiving Day
party...The evidence also is clear that the Bush campaign
organized the transportation of Republican activists across
state lines into Florida. As early as mid-November, the Bush
campaign called on activists to rush to Florida and promised to
pay their expenses. “We now need to send reinforcements,”
the Bush campaign said in an appeal to Republicans on Nov. 18,
2000. “The campaign will pay airfare and hotel expenses for
people willing to go.” [See Tapper’s Down and Dirty.]...“This
is the new Republican Party, sir!” Brad Blakeman, Bush’s
campaign director of advance travel logistics, bellowed into a
bullhorn to disrupt a CNN correspondent interviewing a
Democratic congressman. “We’re not going to take it
anymore!”...Bush himself did
nothing to temper the inflammatory rhetoric. Nor did he urge his
supporters to respect the legally sanctioned vote counting...The
Wall Street Journal added more details, including the fact
that Bush offered personal words of encouragement to the rioters
in a conference call to a Bush campaign-sponsored celebration on
the night of Thanksgiving Day, one day after the canvassing
board assault..." |
3 |
| FL7-01 |
Pat
Buchanan "stronghold" |
Bush
campaign
"...Bush Campaign spokesman Ari Fleischer
last week issued a statement that called Palm Beach County
"a Pat Buchanan stronghold"...and criticized the Gore
Campaign for making an issue of "these routine and
predictable events...They made this claim, according to the
release, based on the fact that "16,695 voters in Palm
Beach County are registered to the Independent Party, the Reform
Party, or the American Reform Party."..."
|
UMD
Source:
"...An analysis by ABCNEWS, however,
shows that the Reform Party, for whom Buchanan is running,
accounts for only 337 of the 16,695 registered voters for the
three parties. The Independent party has 16,336 registered
voters in Palm Beach and the American Reform Party 22. The
Independent Party claims no connection whatsoever to Buchanan or
the Reform Party, though a party official says it's possible
some members might have voted for him. When confronted with the
facts above, Bush campaign spokesman Ari Fleischer told ABCNEWS
the distinction between the Reform Party and Independent Party
didn't matter. Pat Buchanan ran as an independent (small
"i"), so people in the Independent Party might be more
inclined to vote for him, he suggested. When asked to provide
proof there was a connection between the party and Buchanan, or
whether Buchanan ever campaigned for Independent Party members,
he said, "the press release speaks for
itself."..."
Prof.
Christopher Carroll (Johns Hopkins University):
"...Several Republican officials have argued that the high
Buchanan vote in Palm Beach County might have been legitimate
because Palm Beach County was a `Buchanan stronghold.' However,
in the 1996 Republican primary where Buchanan was a candidate,
he did very badly in Palm Beach County, receiving only 15.3
percent of the vote compared to his statewide average of 25.3
percent.4 Furthermore, Buchanan himself has now
disputed the claim that Palm Beach county is a Buchanan
stronghold.5
Another possibility is that the Reform party, whose
candidate Buchanan was this year, is particularly popular in
Palm Beach County. However, Ross Perot, the 1996 Reform Party
presidential nominee, gained only 7.8 percent of the vote in the
1996 Presidential election, compared to a statewide average of
11.8 percent.
Finally, as a measure of whether Palm Beach county is generally
more conservative than the rest of Florida, we can examine the
vote split between Bill Clinton and Bob Dole in 1996. In the
typical county in Florida, Dole garnered 44.7 percent of the
popular vote in the 1996 election. In Palm Beach County, he
received only 33.9 percent of the vote. President Clinton
received 54.8 percent of the Palm Beach vote, compared to a
statewide average of only 43.4 percent. And the 2000 Republican
Senatorial candidate, Bill McCollum, received only 36 percent of
the vote in Palm Beach county, compared with a statewide average
of 48.7 percent.
In sum, there is no evidence that Palm Beach county is either a
Buchanan stronghold, a Reform Party stronghold, or a
conservative stronghold. Indeed, the opposite seems to be
true...we can say with greater than 99.99999 percent confidence
that if the erroneous Buchanan votes had been votes for Gore,
Gore would be leading in the vote count at the moment. In other
words, there is less than one chance in ten million (because 10
million = 1/(1-0.9999999)) that Bush would be ahead without the
erroneous Buchanan ballots...." |
2 |
| FL8-01 |
Electoral process |
Bush
campaign
"...faced with the
Florida Supreme Court ruling requiring a statewide recount of
so-called "under-votes,"...lawyers have rushed to
federal court seeking to stall the state-court-ordered recount
until after Dec. 12...Bush’s lawyers argued that the vote
counting was a threat to “the integrity of the electoral
process” and could cause Bush "irreparable
injury."..."
|
Consortium
News:
"...In
a better-late-than-never look at the mess that was the Florida
vote count, The Washington Post discovered what critics of
George W. Bush’s “victory” have long alleged – that his
537-vote margin benefited from a host of irregularities, many
traceable to his brother’s administration or to post-election
Republican maneuvering.
The Post's most important new discovery might be evidence that
Bush's side padded its lead with scores of absentee votes that
were cast after Election Day or did not meet legal standards.
Those votes were counted
in heavily Republican counties – though not in Democratic
strongholds – after the Bush campaign rallied its supporters
and the national news media to condemn Al Gore's campaign for
initially demanding that legal requirements be followed...The
Post reported that “at least 17 ballots examined by the Post
in four north Florida counties were counted despite bearing
postmarks dated after Nov. 7. Scores more were counted after
arriving without postmarks in elections offices between Nov. 8
and Nov. 17, the deadline for overseas absentee ballots to be
received.”
Republican operatives
and sympathetic pundits condemned Gore as unpatriotic for
insisting that legal standards be met for these ballots [CG
emphasis], many coming from American soldiers stationed
overseas. When Gore's side relented and let many of these
ballots be included, “the result was a rout of the Democrats
in the northern counties, where Bush picked up 176 votes that
lacked postmarks and other required features,” the Post said.
But the Bush forces followed a different strategy in counties of
south Florida with high numbers of African-American, Hispanic
and Jewish voters, according to the Post's study. “Elsewhere,
particularly in Democratic counties, canvassing boards saw
things the opposite way – as did the Bush forces, who demanded
that strict state rules be followed [CG emphasis],”
the Post reported. “In overwhelmingly Democratic Broward
County, elections officials rejected 304 overseas ballots for
various technical reasons, including 119 because they lacked
postmarks. Miami-Dade invalidated about 200; Volusia threw out
43 and Orange 117. All three counties voted Democratic...
...the
Post also reported that:
--At least a couple of thousand voters were improperly removed
from Florida’s voting rolls under an extraordinary effort by
Gov. Jeb Bush’s administration to purge ex-felons. State
officials specifically ordered that “false positives” –
meaning voters whose names and other personal data did not match
those of actual felons – still be put in lists sent to county
canvassing boards.
--Irregularities from this felon purge and from malfunctioning
voting machines fell disproportionately on African-American
voters, who favored Gore by 9-to-1. Even without the
error-plagued felon purge, Florida’s strict rules against
restoring civil rights of past felons have disqualified “31
percent of the state’s black men,” the Post said. That
suggests Florida officials were well aware of the likely impact
on the African-American vote from an aggressive “felon”
purge...
18 of the state’s 67
counties “never recounted the ballots at all,” only
rechecking the tallies of the original results. “To this day,
more than 1.58 million votes [or about one-quarter of Florida's
total] have not been counted a second time,” the Post said.
Some county officials blamed the divergent recount procedures on
Secretary of State Katherine Harris, a Bush loyalist, who
provided no guidance on how to proceed....
Gore “likely lost about 6,500 votes” in Palm Beach because
of the poorly designed “butterfly ballot” that confused many
elderly Jewish voters, according to the Post's analysis. In
other counties, many more ballots were despoiled by confusion
resulting from a “wraparound” ballot developed by Harris’
office, the Post said.”..." |
2 |
OTHER <go back to the top>
Compassion Con credits total =
19
| # |
Topic |
Gov.
Bush or his team's
Compassionate statement |
Some Uncompassionate Facts |
Compassion
Con Credits |
| OT1-01 |
Food as diplomatic
weapon |
Bush
"..."I don't want to use food as a
diplomatic weapon from this point forward. We shouldn't be using
food. It hurts the farmers. It's not the right thing to
do."..."
|
Michael
Kinsley (Dawn/WP):
"...When, just a few days later, he criticized legislation
weakening the trade embargo on Cuba - which covers food along
with everything else - had he rethought his philosophy on this
issue? Or was there nothing to rethink?..."
Sally
Kalson (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette):
"...He says we shouldn't use food as a diplomatic weapon,
yet he supports the trade embargo on Cuba, which uses food as a
weapon...."
|
1 |
| OT2-01 |
Peacekeeping forces |
Bush
(said) "...I hope our European friends
become the peacekeepers in Bosnia and the Balkans. I hope that
they put the troops on the ground, so that we can withdraw our
troops and focus our military on fighting and winning
war..."
|
Eric Alterman
(MSNBC/WLM
page 172):
"......ignoring the fact that 85% of peacekeeping troops in
Kosovo are already European..." |
1 |
| OT3-01 |
Running a frugal
campaign |
Bush and his team
claimed that they were "frugal"
in their campaign spending
|
Daily
Howler:
"...Dan Balz, on last night's NewsHour,
discussed the fact that the Bush campaign has spent $19 million
to date:
BALZ: The Bush campaign
has prided itself, and bragged really, that it is a frugal
campaign, a skinflint campaign, that they watch all their
pennies. The reality is they are spending money at a much higher
rate than Al Gore, who has gotten a lot of criticism for the
amount of money his campaign has spent..."
|
1 |
| OT4-01 |
Texas'
carrying-a-
concealed-weapon law (CCW) |
Bush
"..."You
think it's perfectly all right for people to carry concealed
weapons into churches across the country?" Couric asked.
"No, no, no,"
Bush said to Couric, "but churches ... no, I didn't say
that. Churches in our state of Texas do not let ... if they
don't want somebody doing that, it won't happen. The reason that
part of the bill was passed is because preachers wanted to be
able to carry a concealed weapon in their own home on church
grounds. But people aren't carrying guns in churches in
Texas."..."
|
Jake
Tapper (Salon):
"...The 1995 CCW law prohibited
Texans from carrying concealed handguns into official sporting
events, bars, correctional facilities, amusement parks,
hospitals, nursing homes and "established places of
worship." So Bush went back in 1997 and extended the law so
the CCW holders could carry their guns into places like
churches, amusement parks and rest homes...It is true that Bush
didn't "say that" -- but he did sign it into law...But
why would Bush sign a law allowing CCW holders to carry their
guns into churches if he didn't think people were "carrying
guns in churches in Texas"? Wasn't that the idea?..."
|
1 |
| OT4-02 |
Trigger-lock
giveaway proposal |
Bush spokesman
"...Governor Bush has a strong record
here in Texas, and in fact the law that he talked about
President Clinton actually said was a good idea on Friday,"
Tucker said..."
|
Jake
Tapper (Salon):
"...When asked what Clinton thought
about Bush's new trigger-lock giveaway, Clinton did indeed, say,
"I think it's a good idea," but that was immediately
followed by his question: "But why -- why is he doing that?
"You have to understand what's going
on here," Clinton said, answering his own question in his
inimitable fashion. "There was a report in the newspaper
last week that a lobbyist from the NRA said they would have an
office in the White House if Governor Bush was elected."
Bush, Clinton said, "wants to move away from that image. He
wants people not to think that he won't do anything -- basically
that the NRA will control policy on this. Which they will if he
wins. And if he comes out and gives away gun trigger locks, then
he doesn't have to explain why we're still importing
large-capacity ammunition clips and why he doesn't want to close
the gun-show loophole." That's something that Bush's
"little birdie" forgot to mention.
.."
|
1 |
| OT4-03 |
Background checks for
gun buyers |
Bush
"...I don't think
we ought to be selling guns to people who shouldn't have them.
That's why I support instant background checks at gun shows. One
of the reasons we have an instant background check is so that we
instantly know whether or not someone should have a gun or not..."
|
Jerry
Politex (Bushwatch/Tom Paine):
"...Fact: "Bush overstates the effectiveness of
instant background checks for people trying to buy guns.... The
Los Angeles Times reported on Oct. 3 that during Bush's term as
governor, Texas granted licenses for carrying concealed guns to
hundreds of people with criminal records and histories of drug
problems, violence or psychological disorders." Washington
Post, 10/12/00 "He didn't mention that Texas failed to
perform full background checks on 407 people who had prior
criminal convictions but were granted concealed handgun licenses
under a law he signed in 1995. Of those, 71 had convictions that
should have excluded them from having a concealed gun permit,
the Texas Department of Public Safety acknowledged." AP,
10/12/00..."
|
1 |
| OT5-01 |
Former Russian PM and
IMF |
Bush's
"...accusation
that former Russian prime minister Viktor Chernomyrdin stole
money from the International Monetary Fund.
.."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...Bush’s
accusation against Chernomyrdin, aimed at undercutting Gore’s
work on economic and political reform in Russia, was imprecise
and not supported by the known factual record.
There
have been suspicions of misconduct against Chernomyrdin, but
they have not involved the IMF. After the debate, Chernomyrdin
angrily denied Bush’s IMF accusations, which the campaign did
not buttress with specific evidence..."
|
1 |
| OT5-02 |
IMF loans |
Bush
"...Discussing International Loans:
"And there's some pretty egregious examples recently, one
being Russia where we had IMF loans that ended up in the pockets
of a lot of powerful people and didn't help the nation."..."
|
Jerry
Politex (Bushwatch/Tom Paine):
"...Fact: Bush’s own vice presidential candidate,
Dick Cheney, lobbied for U.S.-backed loan to Russia that helped
his own company. "Halliburton Co. lobbied for and received
$ 292 million in loan guarantees to develop one of the world's
largest oil fields in Russia. Cheney said: 'This is exactly the
type of project we should be encouraging if Russia is to succeed
in reforming its economy...We at Halliburton appreciate the
support of the Export-Import Bank and look forward to beginning
work on this important project.’" PR Newswire 4/6/2000.
The State Department, armed with a CIA report detailing
corruption by Halliburton’s Russian partner, invoked a
seldom-used prerogative and ordered suspension of the loan. The
loan guarantee "ran counter to America's ‘national
interest,’" the State Department ruled. New Republic,
8/7/00..."
|
1 |
| OT6-01 |
High schooling |
Bush
(trying to create a populist image when he)
"...often said that “the biggest difference between me
and my father is that he went to Greenwich Country Day and I
went to San Jacinto Junior High.”..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...there was much less to Bush’s San Jacinto mantra than
actually met the eye. In fact, Bush attended San Jacinto for one
year only—seventh grade. After that, he moved to the tony
Kinkaid School, an elite private school in Houston. After two
years at the Kinkaid School, he became an Andover boarder. In
short, Bush spent five years at elite private schools,
and one year at San Jacinto Junior High. But it was San
Jacinto he repeatedly mentioned, for reasons that were perfectly
plain..."
|
1 |
| OT7-01 |
Federal funding to
states for illegal immigration costs |
Bush
"...asked "if
he would reimburse California for the estimated billions of
dollars the state spends annually on services and education for
illegal immigrants," wrote the Chronicle's Carla Marinucci.
"'No,' said the GOP front-runner. Asked
for a reason, Bush said, 'Because that's not a federal role, in
my judgment.'..."
|
Jerry
Politex (Salon):
"...Republicans and Democrats both
expressed surprise, noting that Texas -- under Bush's own
administration -- has tried to recover such costs." Days
later, according to the New York Times, Bush spinner Mindy
Tucker said her boss believed that the feds should compensate
states, contrary to what was previously reported in the
Chronicle. Tucker said Bush misunderstood the reporter's
question..."
|
1 |
| OT8-01 |
Statements from Texas
Gubernatorial campaign |
Bush
"...At another point, he memorably said,
“I proudly proclaim I’ve never held office. I have been in
the business world all my adult life. I have met a payroll. I
know what it means to risk capital.”..."
"...embellished his
description of Richards, slamming her as a career politician.
“If Texans want someone who has spent her entire adult life in
politics, they should not vote for me,” he said..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...What made this presentation so comical? Bush had
“never held office” for one major reason; when he ran for
office in 1978, the voters had (narrowly) turned his bid down.
That was Bush’s race for Congress; he had also explored the
possibility of running for the Texas state senate in 1972, and
for governor in 1990. Meanwhile, Bush embellished his
description of Richards, slamming her as a career politician.
“If Texans want someone who has spent her entire adult life in
politics, they should not vote for me,” he said. Hmmm.
Richards first ran for office at age 43. Bush, by contrast, was
32 when he spent a year running for Congress..."
|
2 |
| OT9-01 |
Property Rights |
Bush
said he would
"...do everything I can to defend the power of private
property and private property rights,..."
|
Eric Alterman
(MSNBC/WLM
page 172):
"...he and his
partners in the Texas Rangers arranged for Texas authorities to
expropriate private land to allow the investors their new
baseball stadium. When some resisted, or balked at the low
prices being offered, their land was condemned and expropriated
it by force of law. This involved 270 acres of land, even though
only about 17 acres were needed for the ballpark. The rest was
used by Bush and his cronies for commercial development, and has
provided the basis of his personal fortune..."
|
1 |
| OT10-01 |
Africa |
Bush
"...Africa is important and we've got to
do a lot of work in Africa to promote democracy and trade..."
|
Jerry
Politex (Bushwatch/Tom Paine):
"...Fact "While Africa may be important, it
doesn't fit into the national strategic interests, as far as I
can see them," Bush said earlier. When he was asked for his
vision of the U.S. national interests, he named every continent
except Africa. According to Time magazine, "[Bush] focused
exclusively on big ticket issues ... Huge chunks of the globe --
Africa and Latin America, for example -- were not addressed at
all." Time, 12/6/99; PBS "News Hour," 2/16/00;
Toronto Star, 2/16/00..."
|
1 |
| OT11-01 |
Election to Governor |
Bush
"...There's only been one governor ever
elected to back-to-back four year terms and that was me..."
|
Jerry
Politex (Bushwatch/Tom Paine):
"...Fact: The governors who served two consecutive
four-year terms (meeting Bush's statement criteria are): Coke R.
Stevenson (2 consecutive 4-year terms) August 4, 1941-January
21, 1947. Allan Shivers (2 consecutive four-year terms) July 11,
1949-January 15, 1957. Price Daniel (2 consecutive four-year
terms) January 15, 1957-January 15, 1963. John Connally (2
consecutive four-year terms) January 15, 1963-January 21, 1969.
Dolph Briscoe (2 consecutive four-year terms) January 16,
1973-January 16, 1979. George W. Bush (2 consecutive four-year
terms) January 17, 1995 to present. Texas
State Libraries and Archives Commission..."
|
1 |
| OT11-02 |
Hispanic vote
obtained as Governor |
Bush
"...claimed that he had support from 50%
of Hispanics in his last gubernatorial race in the second debate..."
|
Jim
Yardley (New York Times) - found via BAND:
"...Even today,
there is debate in Texas about how well Mr. Bush did with
Hispanics in 1998. He won 69 percent of the overall vote, and he
has claimed winning 49 percent of the Hispanic vote, based on an
initial exit poll. But that figure is remarkably high for a
Republican, and later exit polls and academic studies suggest
his actual total was as low as 33 percent, still high for a
Republican but not as impressive.
"They use the 50 percent, and that's just false," said
Dr. Rodolfo de la Garza, head of the Tomás Rivera Policy
Institute at the University of Texas, who has studied the race.
He cautioned against using the 1998 race as a gauge of Mr.
Bush's potential appeal because turnout was very low and the
challenger was very weak..."
|
1 |
| OT12-01 |
School vouchers |
Bush
"...Vouchers are up to states. If you
want to do a voucher program in Missouri, fine. See, I strongly
believe in local control of schools. I'm a governor of a state,
and I don't like it when the federal government tells us what to
do. I'm for local control of schools..."
|
Jerry
Politex (Bushwatch):
"...Fact: " Bush's education plan forces states
to divert money to vouchers at federal discretion." (ABC.)..."
Jacob
Weisberg (MSN/Slate):
"...As it turns out, Gore is entirely correct. It's
right here in the fine print on Bush's Web site, on the fact
sheet that accompanied a speech he gave in Los Angeles more
than a year ago titled "No Child Left Behind."
According to this policy paper, Bush would require that all
states:
... offer parents of these
students [those in schools judged to be failing after three
years] portable funds, which can be used to obtain for their
child an education at a school of their choice or supplemental
education services. These funds (worth an average $1,500 per
child) will consist of the student's pro rata share of Title 1
funds, provided by the Local Education Agency, and an equal
amount provided by the state from its federal or state funds
[italics added].
In other words, Bush does obviate local
control and require states to help pay for vouchers for students
in failing schools. It's not just federal cuff link--it's an
unfunded, or at least an underfunded mandate! In the past, I've
criticized Bush's
voucher plan by arguing that $1,500 is an amount better
suited to paying for weekly piano lessons than for tuition at
even the shabbiest of private schools. If you want a real test
of vouchers (which I'd like to see), you have to shell out more
money for it. But Bush's chit is even chintzier than I thought.
It provides only an average of $750 in Title 1 money for every
child left behind..."
|
1 |
| OT13-01 |
Sound science |
Bush
Repeatedly stated his commitment to policy
based on "sound science"
|
Tim Noah (MSN/Slate):
"...As a matter of policy, Bush told
The Associated Press last Nov. 14: I'd
make it a goal to make sure that local folks got to make the
decision as to whether or not they said creationism has been a
part of our history and whether or not people ought to be
exposed to different theories as to how the world was formed....Bush
was responding to the Kansas Board of Education's decree
last year that each of the state's school districts teach
creationism alongside evolution...
In an
essay last year in Time, the Harvard paleontologist
Stephen Jay Gould put it this way:
Evolution is as
well documented as any phenomenon in science, as strongly as the
earth's revolution around the sun rather than vice versa. In
this sense, we can call evolution a "fact." (Science
does not deal in certainty, so "fact" can only mean a
proposition affirmed to such a high degree that it would be
perverse to withhold one's provisional assent.)
Dubya's answer to Gould would
seem to be that science, unlike morality, is a
cafeteria of personal choices. What Chatterbox doesn't
understand is how a presidential candidate can argue this
position and still be taken seriously as an education reformer..."
|
1 |
| OT14-01 |
Halliburton and Iraq |
Cheney
"...During...[the] presidential campaign,
Richard B. Cheney acknowledged that the oil-field supply
corporation he headed, Halliburton Co., did business with Libya
and Iran through foreign subsidiaries. But he insisted that he
had imposed a "firm policy" against trading with Iraq.
"Iraq's different," he said..."
|
Colum
Lynch (Washington Post) via Truthout:
"...According to oil industry
executives and confidential United Nations records, however,
Halliburton held stakes in two firms that signed contracts to
sell more than $73 million in oil production equipment and spare
parts to Iraq while Cheney was chairman and chief executive
officer of the Dallas-based company.
Two former senior executives of the Halliburton subsidiaries say
that, as far as they knew, there was no policy against doing
business with Iraq. One of the executives also says that
although he never spoke directly to Cheney about the Iraqi
contracts, he is certain Cheney knew about them...
...in 1998, Cheney oversaw Halliburton's
acquisition of Dresser Industries Inc., which exported equipment
to Iraq through two subsidiaries of a joint venture with another
large U.S. equipment maker, Ingersoll-Rand Co.
The subsidiaries, Dresser-Rand and Ingersoll Dresser Pump Co.,
sold water and sewage treatment pumps, spare parts for oil
facilities and pipeline equipment to Baghdad through French
affiliates from the first half of 1997 to the summer of 2000,
U.N. records show. Ingersoll Dresser Pump also signed contracts
-- later blocked by the United States -- to help repair an Iraqi
oil terminal that U.S.-led military forces destroyed in the Gulf
War.
Former executives at the subsidiaries said they had never heard
objections -- from Cheney or any other Halliburton official --
to trading with Baghdad.
"Halliburton and Ingersoll-Rand, as far as I know, had no
official policy about that, other than we would be in compliance
with applicable U.S. and international laws," said Cleive
Dumas, who oversaw Ingersoll Dresser Pump's business in the
Middle East, including Iraq.
Halliburton's primary concern, added Ingersoll-Rand's former
chairman, James E. Perrella, "was that if we did business
with [the Iraqi regime], that it be allowed by the United States
government. If it wasn't allowed, we wouldn't do it."..."
|
1 |
1. Now
some of you might wonder where this University is located - so, it is
appropriate to make it clear right here that this is not a real University - it
is only a hypothetical institute of lower higher learning.
2. I sometimes prefer to truncate the
words Compassionate Conservative to Compassion Con. There is no intent
here to imply anything significant by this (at least anything more than
is commonly understood). I reserve all moral clarity rights to the use
of this term. One Compassion Con credit is assigned to every instance of
compassion (i.e., misleading, deceptive or inaccurate statement or
outright lie/mendacity).
3.
Note that Compassionate statements made by Mr. Bush's spokespersons,
advisers or appointees - speaking clearly on behalf of Mr. Bush - are
considered as being supported by Mr. Bush, absent a public statement to
the contrary.
|