Compassionate
Nominees
Moral Clarity
aka Honesty
A Promise Made is
A Promise Kept
Compassionate
Policy
Compassionate Media,
Uncompassionate Voices
Using Compassion
Con credits
About CG/
Acknowledgements
Search CG

UNIVERSITY OF COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM (what is this?) 

You have selected

COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM 201 B*
*President Bush's lies and deception moral clarity, honesty and integrity 
during Elections 2000 - Part II

In this course you will learn about the abundant lies, deception or intent to deceive moral clarity, honesty and integrity displayed by President George W. Bush (at that time the compassionate conservative2 Gov. Bush from the state of Texas) - during Elections 2000 (Part II). This part covers his statements on Al Gore, on his own character/beliefs/track record, on the Florida recount and Other issues. Make sure you drop by again when the Election 04 (2004) campaign starts picking up steam, so that you can refresh your memory on his compassion. 

Please note that the statements made by Bush or his spokespersons/administration3 - as cited in column 3 of the tables below - are by default extracted from one or more of the links shown in column 4. If the source of the statements is different from the link(s) in column 4, then a URL is explicitly provided in column 3. For feedback and corrections, please go here.

A detailed acknowledgement of the sites from which the information below was obtained is listed at this location. In particular, I would like to acknowledge the following sites where I got the vast majority of links from: PK archiveAtrios/Eschaton, Politics, Law and Autism, Calpundit, Buzzflash, Daily Howler, Thinking it Through, BushwatchSpinsanity, Altercation

Total Compassion Con credits 2 available from this course to date = 105

Last Update: 10/28/2003

 Please select one of these sections

Once you are done with the above sections, you may choose another course by picking one of the options below

 

AL GORE <go back to the top>

Compassion Con credits total = 33

# Topic Gov. Bush or his team's Compassionate statement Some Uncompassionate Facts Compassion Con Credits
AG1-01 Al Gore and gun policy Bush

"...On May 3, Texas Gov. George W. Bush alleged that Vice President Al Gore was once a member of the National Rifle Association..."

Jake Tapper (Salon):
"...The Gore camp said it could find no evidence that Bush's claim was true, and NRA spokesman Bill Powers said that he, too, could find no record of Gore's membership in the organization's microfiche, but the next day Bush repeated the charge. Pressed by reporters as to how he could make such a claim, Bush said, "He might have been a member, let's put it that way."..."
1
AG1-02 Al Gore and gun policy Bush

"...I disagree with the vice president on this issue. I don't -- he's for registration of guns I think the only people who are going to show up to register or get a license -- I guess licensing, like a driver's license with a gun -- the only people who are going to show up are law-abiding citizens..."

PBS Debate Transcript:
"...
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: Well, I'm not for registration. I am for licensing by states of new handgun purchases.
MR. LEHRER: What does that -- what's that mean?
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: Sort of a license ID, like a driver's license, for new handguns. And, you know, the Los Angeles --
MR. LEHRER: Excuse me, you would have to get the license -- a photo ID to go in and -- before you could buy the gun?
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: Correct.
MR. LEHRER: All right. And who would issue --
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: The state..."

Jerry Politex (Bushwatch/TomPaine):
"...Fact: "Gore actually favors licensing for new handgun purchasers but nothing as vast as registering all guns." Salon, 10/12/00..."

1
AG2-01 Al Gore and the internet Bush

"...In the first debate, after Gore pointed out some of the differences between the two candidates' positions on Medicare, Bush replied, "I'm beginning to think this man not only invented the Internet, he invented the calculator."..."

The statement that Al Gore (claimed to have) "invented the internet" is blatantly false. 

See eRiposte Al Gore media bias page for relevant links.

1
AG3-01 Al Gore and Willie Horton Bush (campaign)

"...said last week that the campaign studied Gore's 1988 presidential bid and closely tracked this year's Democratic primary fight...Gore, they argue, was the first candidate to raise the specter of Willie Horton in the 1988 primary..."

  Daily Howler:
"...As [Ceci] Connolly knows well-as she has reported in the past-Gore never mentioned Horton's name in the 1988 primaries. In one debate (out of 42 total), he criticized the Massachusetts furlough program which had given Horton a weekend pass. But he never mentioned anyone's name; never mentioned anyone's race; never ran an ad on the subject; and never used any photos at all. The claim that Gore engaged in "slash-and-burn politics against fellow Democrats" by "raising the specter of Willie Horton" seems impossible to square with the facts. But these facts are never mentioned in this article-an article in which Gore is repeatedly accused by Bush and Bush officials of being "integrity-challenged," "negative," "a man who feels like he can say what he wants," and someone who feels "free and comfortable about saying things that simply aren't true." "Voters are tired of slash-and-burn politics," Bush's advisers are quoted saying in a large presentation above the article's headline. But in the midst of these accusations and pious claims, Bush's team makes a serious and baldly false claim about Gore. And Connolly-though she knows the facts-never challenges or corrects their assertions, or places them in a full context.
Does Connolly know the facts in question? She has explained them in the Post in the past. Here is her account of this matter in a January 24 article:
But one week later, Bradley was digging up a 15-year-old vote Gore cast on tobacco while in Congress. He then revived the debate over Gore's role in raising the prison furlough of murderer Willie Horton against Michael Dukakis in the 1988 presidential campaign. Although Gore was in fact the first to tar Dukakis with that criticism, Gore studiously avoided mentioning Horton's name or race...."
1
AG4-01 Al Gore and mother-in-law's prescription drug costs Bush ad

"...Remember when Al Gore said his mother-in-law's prescription cost more than his dog's? His own aides said the story was made up..."

Daily Howler:
"...The ad shows a 9/19 Washington Times article. Headline: "Aides concede Gore made up medicine story." But we've found someone else who makes lots of things up—the Washington Times often makes up good stories. Here is the actual part of the Times story where the "Gore aides" make their "concession:"
BOYER AND SCULLY: In fact, Gore aides yesterday could not say whether the candidate's mother-in-law pays for the arthritis medication Lodine out of her own pocket or if the cost is covered by insurance.
Does that sound like the aides "said the story was made up?" The aides said they didn't know how Gore's mom-in-law pays for the drugs. But Gore had never said anything about that. He said (correctly) that his mother-in-law and his dog both use the drug, and that the drug costs more for humans than for pets. Here's the actual quote which appeared in the press—the only quote which appeared in the press. Gore: "While it costs $108 a month for a person, it costs $37.80 for a dog." Those were figures from a congressional study, which Gore used to sketch out the problem. For the record: Boyer and Scully said Gore was correct about the general problem. They wrote, "Gore's basic premise is correct—prescription drugs in general do cost more for humans than for pets." Sorry, folks. "Gore aides" never said that "the story was made up."..."
1
AG4-02 Al Gore and Bush's Prescription drug plan Bush

"...[Gore] talks about numbers. I’m beginning to think, not only did he invent the Internet, but he invented the calculator. (LAUGHTER). 
It’s fuzzy math. It’s to scare them, trying to scare people in the voting booth..."

Bush

"...GORE (to Bush): 95% of all seniors would get no help whatsoever, under my opponent’s plan, for the first 4 or 5 years. Why is it that the wealthiest 1% get their tax cuts the first year, but 95% of seniors have to wait 4 to 5 years before they get a single penny?
BUSH: I guess my answer to that is, the man’s running on Mediscare, trying to frighten people in the voting booth. That’s just not the way I think, and I that’s just not my intentions. That’s not my plan..."

Daily Howler:
"...Earlier—in his second statement of the entire night—Bush had accused Gore of using "phony numbers," and he maintained that critique throughout the debate, not excluding this ten-minute segment...In fact, the discussion of prescription drugs was one of the great battles royales in TV debate history...Bush was dramatically, crazily wrong about his own prescription drug plan (by all accounts, one of the issues in which voters were taking the most interest). Repeatedly, Bush misstated his own plan, attacking Gore’s character in the process. Gore said that seniors earning more than 25 grand would get no help from Bush’s plan for four or five years; Bush insisted that all senior citizens, not just the poor, got "instant help" under his plan. About this, Bush was clearly wrong, as that visit to his web site would have shown. But Bush accused Gore of "fuzzy math" when he correctly described the Bush plan; he said that Gore was "running on MediScare, trying to frighten people in the voting booth."...Brooks Jackson, Inside Politics, next day:
JACKSON: Gore said Bush’s prescription drug plan would at first give not one penny to a couple make $25,000 a year. And this time, Bush bruised the truth when he denied it.
BUSH (on videotape): Under my plan, the man gets immediate help with prescription drugs.
JACKSON: Wrong, unless the man spends $6,000 a year on prescriptions
..."
2

(1 for calling Gore a liar, and 1 for lying compassion about his own plan)

AG4-03 Gore's prescription drugs plan Bush

"...the Gore Plan Provides: No choices, insufficient coverage. Al Gore says he’ll fight for the people against HMOs, but his prescription drug proposal forces seniors to join HMOs selected for them by Washington..."

Jonathan Chait (The New Republic):
"...Or consider prescription-drug coverage, Gore's signature issue. Bush never showed much interest in the topic until his recent free fall, when polls suggested Gore was killing him on it. So rapidly did Bush embrace the issue that he launched the advertisements touting his prescription-drug plan a full week before he unveiled the plan itself. And, again, offering a competing plan was not sufficient--Bush mimicked Gore's arguments as well. The main differences between the candidates' proposals are that Gore would spend more money to insure more seniors and offer drug coverage through the Medicare program itself, while Bush would spend less and rely more heavily on HMOs for coverage. But that hasn't stopped Bush from accusing Gore of "insufficient coverage." Nor has it kept him from imitating the vice president's broadsides against managed care by claiming, perversely, that Gore would "force seniors into a government-run HMO."..."
2
AG5-01 Al Gore and Bush's tax cut proposal Bush

"...accused Vice President Al Gore of using “fuzzy math” when Gore pointed out that Bush’s plan would spend more of the surplus on tax cuts for the wealthiest 1 percent of taxpayers than on education, health, prescription drugs and the national defense combined..."

"...Bush, citing figures his staff said were from a review of his plan by Congress’ Joint Committee on Taxation, said that $223 billion of the total would go to these affluent taxpayers not the some $561 billion the Gore campaign has suggested..."

Daily Howler:
"...For the record, there was one journalist who spoke in real time, discussing Bush’s post-debate lying. Her piece appeared on October 17, 2000. The sub-headline? “Bush seems to be having trouble with math lately.”...[she wrote]
The next day on “Good Morning America,” Bush admitted that Gore’s math wasn’t fuzzy after all. Later that day on CNN, he changed his story again...
Bush’s attack on the vice president’s mathematical calculations has a dual irony. First, Bush was using fuzzy math himself…While Bush accused his opponent of using “fuzzy math,” the Republican candidate’s own statistics were partisan-created rhetoric rather than substantiated facts...
Gore was correct in his statement about Bush’s budget figures. In Bush’s plan, the tax cut for the top 1 percent of Americans ($620 billion) is greater than total domestic spending on education ($47.6 billion), health ($131.9 billion), prescription drugs ($158 billion), and national defense ($45 billion) combined.
Bush’s questionable calculations were made apparent again during the second presidential debate last Wednesday. Again, Bush defended his tax plan, saying that the top 1 percent would receive only $223 billion. Likewise, the Bush campaign cites that only 21 percent of the tax cut goes to the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans. But this 21 percent and associated $223 billion numbers do not include the repeal of the estate tax…
Ignoring these facts, Bush argued that his tax cut for the wealthy was far less than his actual policies and plans demonstrate.

...Who wrote this October 17 critique? Why, it was Melanie Ho, a UCLA senior, writing in the Daily Bruin. While mainstream “journalists” cowered and quaked—and told the world what a liar Gore was—a college student was somehow able to note the “irony” in what Bush was doing. We’ve often asked if high school students could get away with work like the press corps’. In the fall of 2000, only Melanie Ho—a college student—had the courage to get this tale right. Who created the Culture of Lying? Manifestly, your “press corps” did..."

Daily Howler:
"...Consummate clowning would be involved in the effort to shoot down Gore’s statement. But it all began with a blunder by Bush. The morning after that first debate, Bush appeared on Good Morning America. Asked about Gore’s “one percent” claim, Bush seemed to say that the claim had been accurate. Charles Gibson had to ask his question two times. But the second time, he got Bush to answer:
GIBSON (10/4/00): You said all of that. But is he incorrect in saying that you would give to the top one percent of income earners in this country in tax relief more than you would spend on health care, prescription drugs, education, and national defense combined?
BUSH: No. That’s what I just said. I think what people have got to understand is, wealthy people pay a lot of taxes today. And if everyone gets tax relief, wealthy people are going to get tax relief.

To all appearances, Bush had said that Gore’s claim was factually accurate. Clearly, that’s what GMA thought he had said. “We heard Governor Bush just say that Vice President Gore was right on the amount that he’d be spending for the richest Americans,” Diane Sawyer said, a few moments later. Within hours, though, that had changed. By the afternoon of October 4, Candidate Bush was trashing Gore hard, saying that his claims were invented. In an interview with the Baltimore Sun’s Karen Hosler, he basically called Gore a liar: 
HOSLER: [Bush] spoke disparagingly of figures Gore gave regarding Medicare. “I don’t know where he drug up those numbers,” said Bush in his Texas twang, “probably the same place he drug up the numbers on rich people—he made it up.”..."

2

(1 for calling Gore a liar, and 1 for lying compassion about his own plan)

AG5-02 Al Gore and Bush's tax cut proposal Bush

"...Larry Lindsey, Bush's chief economic adviser, proclaimed, "The Joint Committee on Taxation proves that Vice President Gore was badly mistaken, inaccurately portraying Governor Bush's plan as costing sixty percent more than it actually does."..."

Bush

"...I can’t let the man continue with fuzzy math. It’s $1.3 trillion, Mr. Vice President. And it’s going to go to everybody who pays taxes. I’m not going to be a pick-and-chooser. What is fair is everybody who pays taxes ought to get relief..."

The New Republic:
"...Bush staffers have been claiming it would cost just $1.3 trillion over ten years--which, combined with some optimistic assumptions about spending, would keep Bush's budgets from dipping into the red. The problem is that independent analyses show that Bush's tax cut would cost far more than $1.3 trillion, and the Bush campaign has refused to reveal how it came up with the number. This week, though, the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation released an analysis of Bush's plan that showed it would indeed cost only $1.3 trillion. The Bushies immediately announced their vindication. Larry Lindsey, Bush's chief economic adviser, proclaimed, "The Joint Committee on Taxation proves that Vice President Gore was badly mistaken, inaccurately portraying Governor Bush's plan as costing sixty percent more than it actually does." Press accounts dutifully reported the counterclaims in the scrupulously evenhanded style of daily journalism. 
But what the Bush staff did not mention--and none of the reporters realized--is that the JCT data that the Texas governor is touting do not cover the ten-year cost of Bush's tax cut--it covers only the first nine years [CG emphasis]. The Bush campaign has been shockingly dishonest about this. Its press release touts the figure as accounting for the "Current `Ten Year' Budget Period"; the quotes around the phrase "Ten Year" apparently signify that the budget period in question is actually nine years. "Ten Year" is perhaps meant as some sort of figure of speech. Perhaps Bush should rethink his plans to make honesty the central issue of the campaign
..."
2

(1 for calling Gore a liar, and 1 for lying compassion about his own plan)

AG6-01 Al Gore and investment of social security  funds in stocks Bush

"...Now all of a sudden [Gore's] decided it's okay to be managing money in the stock market. First the stock market was roulette and risky, and now the heat's on, and he changes position..."

Daily Howler:
"...But how much were pundits willing to spin you? They were willing to spin you a lot. According to Kelly, Gore's "big tax cuts" were "sudden" and his retirement plan was "abrupt;" Gore had reinvented himself out of nowhere. The great god Spin roared with pride. But had the Gore cuts really come out of nowhere? Ron Brownstein, in the Los Angeles Times, had recently mentioned some facts:

BROWNSTEIN: In January, the Office of Management and Budget estimated the operating budget surplus—that is, funds in federal accounts excluding Social Security—would total $746 billion through 2010. But revenue growth linked to the booming economy has been running so strong that OMB is expected to estimate the on-budget surplus will be as much as $1 trillion larger over that period.
In other words, as everyone (including Kelly) well knows, the projected federal budget surplus will soon officially double. And, as everyone (including Kelly) knows, it is in that context that Gore "suddenly" offered an increase in his proposed tax cuts. Strangely, Kelly never mentions the impending change in surplus projections as he trashes Gore for "suddenly" changing. But luckily, Brownstein isn't a spinner. He described the way the new projections were changing both parties' plans:
BROWNSTEIN: The new money has encouraged a similar pattern of convergence and contrast [between Bush and Gore] on Social Security. Last summer, when he prepared his budget blueprint, Gore was forced to eliminate Clinton's proposal for federally subsidized accounts that would help middle-income worker save for retirement. Gore had to abandon the proposal because he needed the money to fund his education and health care ideas...But the surplus projections have grown so large that Gore today, without retrenching any of his other spending plans, is scheduled to unveil a variation on Clinton's retirement account plan.
How hard is this to figure out? Previously, Gore couldn't afford the retirement accounts. With the new budget projections, they are affordable..."
1
AG6-02 Al Gore's social security plan Bush

"...responded by charging that Mr. Gore's Social Security plan will add no less than $40 trillion to the national debt..."

Paul Krugman (New York Times):
"...That seems like an awfully big number. It turns out to be an estimate of the total value of payments from the general government budget to Social Security, including interest, that will take place over the next 50 years. And I could bore you by explaining why that number is meaningless. The really amazing thing, however, is that the number has nothing to do with Mr. Gore. It's true that Social Security will need transfers from general revenue if Mr. Gore's plan is put into effect. But it will need just as much money if Mr. Gore's plan isn't put into effect. The only way to reduce the required aid would be to reduce the benefits promised to retirees...Maybe blaming Mr. Gore for future mortality wouldn't have worked; but Mr. Bush's advisers seem to think that blaming him for the entire future liabilities of the Social Security system will, or at least can serve temporarily to confuse voters who might otherwise have started to think too clearly about the subject. Only two weeks to go until the election, and we can clean up the mess later, right?..."

Also see: Sam Parry (Consortium News)

1
AG6-03 Al Gore and social security Bush

"...Promoting his own plan to allow workers to invest some of their Social Security money in stocks and bonds, Bush said Gore "doesn't think people are up to the task of managing their own money." "This is analog thinking in a digital age, 28K thinking in a broadband era, and eight-track ideology in an MP3 world," Bush asserted, drawing hearty applause and laughter. "And our nation must move beyond it." Bush has defended his plan to augment Social Security with "personal retirement accounts" against Gore claims that it would drain the underlying Social Security system by $1 trillion over ten years. "My opponent seems to be deliberately missing a trillion dollars. Maybe if you've been in Washington too long you lose your ability to count real money," Bush said..."It is irresponsible for the chairman of the Democratic Party and for Vice President Gore to stoke the fears of seniors while ignoring the hopes of younger workers," Bush said..."

Paul Krugman (New York Times):
"...In context, it's pretty clear he meant that Mr. Gore is an old-economy fuddy-duddy because he insists that you can't spend the same money twice — that you can't divert Social Security taxes into individual accounts for young workers and use that same money to pay benefits to their parents. Well, it's a new economy, but it's not that new. The rules of arithmetic are the same, whether you use a slide rule or a supercomputer..."

Jonathan Chait (The New Republic):
"...Bush acts as if this concept were new. It's not. Indeed, the United States once had a retirement system in which individuals made their own decisions and managed their own money. This system would best be described as "nothing." It's what we had before 1935, and it didn't work terribly well: people who didn't earn lavish incomes over the course of their working lives often ended up in poverty, as did those who gambled on risky investments and lost. That's why FDR's administration created Social Security: to make sure every worker got a pension sufficient to pay for basic necessities like food and shelter...
Bush, cleverly, has turned this into a moral argument. "Al Gore, who calls these bipartisan proposals risky, has a substantial amount of his money invested in the stock market," he claims (erroneously). "Why does he object to young Americans doing the same?" Of course Gore does not object to young Americans, or anybody else, having money in the stock market; he objects to cutting a guaranteed benefit in order for them to do so..."

2

(1 for lying compassion about his plan 1 for lying compassion about Gore)

AG6-04 Clinton/Gore on social security and Medicare Bush

said "...that the Clinton administration did nothing "to strengthen Social Security and repair Medicare,"..."

Richard Cohen (Washington Post):
"...He lies when he says that the Clinton administration did nothing "to strengthen Social Security and repair Medicare," when a fair reading of the administration's record suggests it did...."
1
AG7-01 Al Gore's overall spending plan Bush

"...charged that Gore’s spending proposals are three times what Clinton proposed in 1992...said Gore’s spending proposals are greater than the combination of what Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis proposed in 1984 and 1988, respectively...
[claimed]
Gore’s total spending [proposal was]...$127 billion..."

Issues 2000:
"...
Bush charged that Gore’s spending proposals are three times what Clinton proposed in 1992. But back then, federal spending was constrained by the federal deficit, which has been wiped out during Clinton’s terms.
While Bush is correct that Gore’s spending proposals exceed his, the combination of Bush’s spending plans and tax cuts would eat up more of the surplus than Gore would with his more modest tax cut and his larger spending plans.
To further complicate matters, Bush said Gore’s spending proposals are greater than the combination of what Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis proposed in 1984 and 1988, respectively. However, it appears Bush arrived at the number by using inflation-adjusted spending proposals and comparing them with estimates of Gore’s spending plans prepared by partisan groups such as the Republican staff of the Senate Budget Commitee. Gore’s total spending, according to the campaign, would be about $88 billion a year, not the $127 billion the Bush camp contends. 
Source: Boston Globe analysis of St. Louis debate Oct 18, 2000..."
3
AG7-02 Al Gore's overall spending plan Bush

"...Under Gore’s plan, we’re talking about. adding 20,000 new bureaucrats..."

Issues 2000:
"...ANALYSIS: Bush is basing his claims on a partisan report by the Republican members of the Senate Budget Committee. To get their numbers, they applied today’s ratio of employees to expenditures to their own estimates of Gore’s budget. The assumption-that more spending means more employees-DOESN“T NECESSARILY FOLLOW. In fact, during the 1990s, spending went up (by 38%) while the federal work force went down (by 12%). Source: Presidential Debate, Boston Globe, “Number Crunch”, p. A15 Oct 11, 2000..."
1
AG7-03 Al Gore's overall spending plan Bush

"...The Senate Budget Committee did a study of Gore’s expenditures: it could conceivably bust the budget by $900 billion..."

Issues 2000:
"...GORE: What he’s quoting is not the Senate Budget Committee, it is a partisan press release by the Republicans..." 

[CG note: it appears it was the GOP members of the Budget committee - so it was a partisan release]
1
AG7-04 Al Gore's overall spending plan Bush

"...Bush said Gore was a big spender whose proposals would bust the budget. And he said electing Gore would mean the return of big government..."

Issues 2000:
"...
Bush’s budget has less of a buffer than Gore’s does. Bush’s budget would use all but $265 billion of the surplus, and that is without paying for some of his campaign promises, like missile defense. Gore says he would set aside $660 billion of the surplus for a reserve fund.
Gore said he had helped slim down the federal bureaucracy through his work on the administration’s Reinventing Government initiative. Since 1992, the civilian government work force has fallen by 400,000 people, to 1.82 million, although nearly three-quarters of the reduction has been the Pentagon.
Some analysts measure the size of government by looking at total spending relative to the size of the economy. By that measure, outlays have declined steadily in recent years, to 18.7% of gross domestic product this year. Gore said his plan would push that figure down to 17% by 2008. Source: NY Times analysis of St. Louis debate Oct 19, 2000..."
1
AG8-01 Al Gore and Campaign spending Bush

"...in the first presidential debate, the Republican claimed that the Gore campaign had out-spent his. “This man has out-spent me,” Bush said..."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...In fact, Bush has raised and spent more than twice as much money in this election as Gore has raised and spent. There has been no explanation from the Bush campaign about this remarkable claim and the national news media have not pressed for one, as the media certainly would have if Gore had made a similarly false statement. .."

Daily Howler (1999):
"...According to Ceci Connolly’s Post Magazine cover story (4/4), the Gore campaign hopes to spend $47 million during the upcoming primaries. This would include up to $16 million in federal matching funds--meaning the campaign itself would have to raise $31 million from individual contributors...
CONNOLLY: [W]hile the vice president’s game plan this year is virtually the same as Lamar Alexander’s or Elizabeth Dole’s or George W. Bush’s, his fund-raising machine is bigger, tougher, faster.
But it’s hard to know how to reconcile that with the fund-raising goals we have stated. When Gore is raising $31 million to Bush’s $50 million, how is the Gore “machine” “bigger?” Indeed, Connolly acknowledges the Bush camp’s plan later on in her article:
CONNOLLY: In recent campaigns, wealthy contestants like Ross Perot and Steve Forbes have tossed out the rule book and the matching funds that come with it and spent their own millions with no restrictions. And this year, Texas Gov. George W. Bush, fearing Forbes will again use his wealth to carpet-bomb fellow Republicans, is considering forgoing matching funds in order to bust the spending limits in the early primaries..."

Also see: Daily Howler

1
AG9-01 Al Gore and the environment Bush

"...''I think the vice president is probably going to have to explain what he meant by some of the things in his book, to share with us the philosophy behind some of the standards in the book.''..."

USA Today:
"...Later, Bush acknowledged he has not read ''Earth in the Balance.''..."
1
AG9-02 Clinton/Gore on National forest protection Bush

"...said the Clinton-Gore administration “took 40 million acres of land out of circulation without consulting local officials. … I just cited an example of the administration just unilaterally acting without any input.” ..."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...Bush was referring to a pending administration proposal to protect 40 million acres of roadless areas in national forests from more road building and logging. As the Sierra Club noted in a press release, Bush’s statement was false. “In fact, the Forest Service conducted 600 public meetings about the proposal nationwide and more than one million Americans urged the administration to strengthen the proposal,” the Sierra Club said. “There was ample opportunity for local officials and others to comment on the proposal.” ..."
1
AG9-03 Clinton/Gore on ANWR drilling Bush

"...I just found out the other day an interesting fact, that there's a national petroleum reserve right next to Prudhoe Bay that your administration had opened up for exploration in that pristine area..."

Sierra Club:
"...MISLEADING: The National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska was set aside specifically for potential oil and gas production. Last year, the Administration opened a portion of the NPR-A to leasing and development, being careful to prohibit drilling in environmentally sensitive areas, such as the Colville River Delta and Teshekpuk Lake. The NPR-A lies far to the west of the Arctic National Widllife Refuge and is separated from the coastal plain by the Prudhoe Bay oil fields. Bush would like to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling even though it contains many sensitive areas with unmatched ecological diversity. The coastal plain of the Arctic Refuge is home to polar bears, caribou, musk oxen and other rare species..."
1
AG10-01 Clinton/Gore Army divisions ill-prepared for combat Bush

said "...that two of the Army's 10 active divisions are so ill-prepared for combat that, if called, they would have to report, "Not ready for duty, sir."..."

Richard Cohen (Washington Post):
"...The Army says Bush is flat-out wrong...."

Issues2000:
"...Bush had said: “If called on by the commander-in-chief today, two entire divisions of the Army would have to report ‘Not ready for duty, sir.’” But Maj. Thomas Collins, an Army spokesman, told CNN: “All 10 Army divisions are combat-ready, fully able to meet their war-fighting mission.”..."

1
AG10-02 Clinton/Gore Military spending Bush

said "Not since the years before Pearl Harbor has our investment in national defense been so low as a percentage"

Paul Krugman (New York Times):
"...Strangely, if you looked at the numbers put out by his economic team, you found that he actually proposed to reduce that percentage further, spending substantially less on defense than his opponent..."

POST-SCRIPT (2001)
"...Last week, according to newspaper reports, Mr. Bush told lawmakers that there would be "no new money this year for defense." Karen Hughes, a counselor to Mr. Bush, conceded that "we may in fact need resources" for the military — may? after all that martial rhetoric? — but made it clear that there was no rush. One officer bitterly declared, "It sounds like campaign promise No. 1 being broken."..."

(Note that increased defense spending was proposed by the administration only after its 2001 tax cut passed)

1
AG11-01 Clinton/Gore on children Bush

claiming "...Clinton and Al Gore "have done nothing to help children"..."

Richard Cohen (Washington Post):
"...His team--now I am including Dick Cheney--lies when it says Clinton and Al Gore "have done nothing to help children" when children, it can be fairly said, have been an obsession of this administration. Among other things, the Clinton administration doubled the funding of Head Start. Bush himself now professes love for this program, which Cheney, while he was in the House, voted to abolish....."
1
AG12-01 Clinton/Gore on tax cuts Bush

"...You were promised a middle class tax cut in 1992. It didn't happen..." (suggesting Clinton/Gore didn't keep a promise)

Jerry Politex (Bushwatch):
"...Fact: "The administration negotiated a budget bill with the Republican Congress in 1997 that included a children's tax credit that reduced taxes for the middle class." (E.J. Dionne, Jr., Houston Chronicle, 10/18/00) --Politex, 10/19/00..."
1
AG13-01 Al Gore and EITC Bush

"...I felt during his debate with Senator [Bill] Bradley saying he [Gore] authored the EITC [earned-income tax credit] when it didn't happen..."

Jerry Politex (Bushwatch/TomPaine):
"...Fact: "Actually, Gore had claimed to have authored an "expansion of the earned-income tax credit," which he did in 1991." Salon, 10/12/00..."
1

 

STATEMENTS RELATING TO BUSH'S CHARACTER/BELIEFS <go back to the top>

Compassion Con credits total = 33

# Topic Gov. Bush or his team's Compassionate statement Some Uncompassionate Facts Compassion Con Credits
BS1-01 Being a moderate Bush

"..."Real Plans for Real People."... "Compassionate conservatism"... "Reformer With Results"..."

Jonathan Chait (The New Republic):
"...
Last Monday, George W. Bush visited a retirement home to discuss Medicare and prescription drugs. On Tuesday, his topic again was health care. On Wednesday, he turned to the environment. On Thursday, it was education and the achievement gap. The theme, his campaign explained, was "Real Plans for Real People." 
Or, put another way, "I'm a moderate"--which has been the message behind practically every Bush slogan for the last year. "Compassionate conservatism" meant "I'm different from the Republican Congress." "Reformer With Results" meant "I'm as different from the Republican Congress as John McCain is." Bush's convention refrain--"They have not led. We will"--meant "I'll pursue the same goals as the Clinton-Gore administration, only more effectively." "Real Plans for Real People" means "My policies are as mainstream as Al Gore's."
Given the political landscape--most voters support the Democratic positions on major issues--Bush's message of moderation is good strategy. It is also a lie. In the substance of his program, Bush is running to the right of Bob Dole in 1996 and to the right of today's Republican Congress...His proposed policies, if enacted, would alter government more dramatically than anything in the last three generations. "We will look back at the Bush years," predicts GOP activist Grover Norquist, "as moving the country further and faster toward individual liberty than the Reagan years." Conservative columnists George Will and Lawrence Kudlow have independently hailed Bush and Dick Cheney as the Republican Party's most conservative ticket since Calvin Coolidge. Accordingly, conservatives--the same cantankerous bunch that castigated stalwarts like Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott as apostates--have fallen behind Bush in lockstep...." 
(read more on the evidence Chait provides)
1
BS2-01 Drug use Bush

"...“Could I pass the challenge of a background check? My answer is absolutely,” Bush said. “Not only could I pass the background check and the standards applied to today’s White House, but I could have passed the background check and the standards applied on the most stringent conditions when my dad was President -- 15-year period.”..."

Jake Tapper (Salon):
"...Under a barrage of tenacious media inquiries, as well as polling data indicating that the American people find the question relevant, Bush finally decided to abandon his refuse- to- answer- questions strategy. In a testy exchange with a reporter on August 18, he said that he would be able to pass the traditional White House background check question as to whether he'd used drugs in the past seven years.
But that answer only raised more questions than it answered, and amid a hail of media criticism Bush felt impelled to issue yet another clarification the next day, extending the time frame when he could have passed the background check to include the time when his father was president -- "a 15-year period." Finally, a Bush spokesperson expanded the definition yet again, stating that Bush was saying he had not used illegal drugs at any time since he was 28, in 1974 -- the year he graduated from Harvard Business School and moved back to Texas.
(The Clinton White House background check, it should be noted, asks prospective senior officials if they have ever used illegal drugs since the age of 18. Bush refuses to answer that question.)..."Bush has now created this whole narrative which could be interpreted as Clintonian obfuscation," says William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard. "And that chips away at this picture we've been presented with of Bush as the white knight leading Republicans back into the White House."..."

Also see: Jake Tapper (Salon)

1
BS2-02 Drug use

Bush

"...It's time for some politician to stand up and say, "Enough is enough of this." The game of trying to force me to prove a negative and to chase down unsubstantiated ugly rumors has got to end..."

 

Daily Howler:
"...Bush says he won't discuss what he may have done wrong, because it may make young people think it's OK. But he has widely discussed the fact that he drank heavily until he was forty years old. To believe Bush didn't do drugs is to believe the following: on principle, he won't discuss the thing he didn't do, while discussing quite freely the thing that he did. We take it as obvious that this makes no sense. But some in the press pretend otherwise...
EVANS: The "Big Question" for Gov. George W. Bush, Jr., of Texas. Governor, there are and have been rumors—lots of them—of your possible past use of hard drugs. Sir, is it not now in your interest to tell us flatly that the rumors are or are not true?
GOV. BUSH: You know, Rollie, when I first got started on this campaign I started hearing about these ridiculous rumors. I made my mind up at that time not to chase every single rumor that had been floated about me...It's time for some politician to stand up and say, "Enough is enough of this." The game of trying to force me to prove a negative and to chase down unsubstantiated ugly rumors has got to end.
...But, despite the artless questioning of the occasional host, Bush is not being asked to "disprove a rumor." He is being asked to answer a question, one which every presidential candidate has been asked since the 1988 campaign. The 1988 admissions by candidates Gore and Babbitt resulted from The Question. In 1992, Candidate Clinton's famous statement that he didn't inhale resulted from the same process. Every other candidate in the present race has been asked the question which Bush has been asked. No one asked them to prove their case when they said that they didn't use drugs..."

2
BS3-01 Use of focus groups/ polling Bush

"...said, “I think you've got to look at how one has handled responsibility in office, whether or not … you've got the capacity to convince people to follow; whether or not one makes decisions based upon sound principles; or whether or not you rely upon polls and focus groups on how to decide what the course of action is. We've got too much polling and focus groups going on in Washington today. We need decisions made on sound principles.” ..."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...Left out was that Bush’s campaign has spent roughly $1 million on polls and focus groups during this campaign, about equal to the Gore campaign’s spending, according to a report by NBC News. [Oct. 6, 2000]. Indeed, Bush changed his campaign slogan from “Compassionate Conservative” to “Real Plans for Real People” because of poll analysis done by his campaign. .."

Daily Howler:
"...
Weisman did introduce one new idea—the idea that Bush has done the same things as Gore, but just hasn't been ridiculed for it. Indeed, we were struck by that very same thought when we read Terry Neal's piece in last Friday's Washington Post. According to Neal, the GOP is "planning a summer convention that minimizes attack politics." Why has the party decided to play down attacks? Here was one part of the background:
NEAL: Last month, the Texas governor's campaign held focus group discussions and concluded that Vice President Gore's biggest liability with voters is his personality—particularly when he's in attack mode. The information collected there as well as polling data has persuaded the campaign to take the high road and deviate from its original strategy, which Bush indicated in March would include direct and frequent attacks on Gore.
Ohmigod! According to Neal, the Bush campaign has used focus groups and polling data, and changed the hopeful's approach! If you wanted to, you could almost say that Bush had thus "reinvented himself." Indeed, Neal also stated in his piece that Bush will avoid certain issues at the convention:
NEAL: The campaign is trying to focus the event narrowly on the issues Bush has concentrated on since effectively wrapping up the nomination in March: education, Social Security and Medicare, "compassion subjects" (empowerment and revitalization), and national defense...Notably absent from the agenda are tax cuts and abortion.
Bush's tax cut was once "rolled out" as a major part of his campaign...."

2
BS4-01 White House guest sleepovers  Bush

"...“I believe they've moved that sign, ‘The buck stops here,’ from the Oval Office desk to ‘The buck stops here’ on the Lincoln bedroom, and that's not good for the country. It's not right. We need to have a new look about how we conduct ourselves in office,” Bush said. .."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...What Bush left out was that since he took office in 1995, he has had 203 guests stay over at the Governor’s Mansion in Austin, Texas. More than half of them have contributed to his campaign, amounting to $2.2 million. [The Public I]..."
1
BS5-01 Air National Guard Bush

"...In his 1999 autobiography A Charge to Keep, Mr. Bush offers a lyrical description of his flight training in the F-102 fighter. "I continued flying with my unit for the next several years," he writes..."

"...His campaign biography states that he flew with the unit until he won release from the service in September 1973, nine months early, for graduate school..."

Joe Conason (New York Observer):
"...That simply isn’t true: Lieutenant Bush never flew another jet after being suspended from flight duty in August 1972 for failing to take a mandated annual physical..."

Eric Alterman (MSNBC/WLM page 173):
"...But both claims are false. Bush flew with the 111th for 22 months, until April 1972, and never flew again..."

Note: Uggabugga's table is good. Also see AWOLBush.

2
BS5-02 Air National Guard Bush

"...Further along [in his 1999 autobiography] he says his military service "gave me respect for the chain of command."..."

Joe Conason (New York Observer):
"...Not enough respect, apparently, to report for duty as ordered, since his records show that he ignored two direct orders to do so..."
1
BS5-03 Air National Guard Bush

"...claim that he vaulted ahead of the Air Guard waiting list because he was willing to fly an airplane, and there were openings..."

"They were looking for pilots, and I was honored to serve.", Governor Bush told the Dallas Morning News. [DMN9/08/99]..."

  Democrats.com:
"...
“But Tom Hail, a historian for the Texas Air National Guard, said that records do not show a pilot shortage in the Guard squadron at the time. Hail, who reviewed the unit's personnel records for a special Guard museum display on Gov. Bush's service, said Bush's unit had 27 pilots at the time he began applying. While that number was two short of its authorized strength, the unit had two other pilots who were in training and another awaiting a transfer. There was no apparent need to fast-track applicants, he said.” [LAT 7/4/99]
“The Texas Air Guard had about 900 slots for pilots, air and ground crew members, supervisors, technicians and support staff. Sgt. Donald Dean Barnhart, who still serves in the Guard, said that he kept a waiting list of about 150 applicants' names. He said it took up to a year and a half for one name to move to the top of the list.  "Quite a few gentlemen were wanting to get in," he recalled.  For Bush, there was no wait. He met with commander Staudt in his Houston office and made his application--all before his graduation in June.” [LAT, 7/4/99]

“Beckwith, Bush's spokesman, painted a different picture. He said that the Guard needed pilots at the time and Bush was available. "A lot of people weren't qualified" or willing to fly, he said, so special commissions were offered to those willing to undergo the extra training required.”
 [LAT 7/4/99]

“But Shoemake, who also served as a chief of personnel in the Texas Guard from 1972 to 1980, remembers no pilot shortage. "We had so many people coming in who were super-qualified," he said.” [LAT 7/4/99]
“Records from his [Bush’s] military file show that in January 1968, after inquiring about Guard admission, Mr. Bush went to an Air Force recruiting office near Yale, where he took and passed the test required by the Air Force for pilot trainees. His score on the pilot aptitude section, one of five on the test, was in the 25th percentile, the lowest allowed for would-be fliers.” [7/4/99]..."
2
BS5-04 Air National Guard Bush

"...Bush and his campaign have said that he performed "alternative" duty at the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron in Montgomery from May to November 1972, while he was working on a Senate race in Alabama..."

"...Bush has said that he has “some recollection” of attending drills that year, but has not been more specific..."

Bush campaign

(provided a) "...tattered piece of attendance record (which lists no months, years, or last name)...as evidence of attending Air National Guard training..."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...
Bush has a one-year gap in his National Guard duty from 1972-1973 when he was supposed to have transferred from the Texas Air National Guard to the Alabama Air National Guard. According to the Boston Globe, “In his final 18 months of military service in 1972 and 1973, Bush did not fly at all. And … for a full year, there is no record that he showed up for the periodic drills required of part-time guardsmen.” [Boston Globe, May, 23, 2000]. Bush has said that he has “some recollection” of attending drills that year, but has not been more specific. Under Air National Guard rules at the time, anyone who did not report to required drills could be inducted in the draft to serve in Vietnam, according to the Globe. That never happened to Bush. The press has reported these gaps in Bush’s record, but has not pressed the issue as a story worthy of determined pursuit or pundit show commentary. Similarly, Bush’s implausible answers have not led to questions from the media about Bush’s veracity..."

Eric Alterman (MSNBC/WLM page 173):
"...
But, the Globe notes, Bush’s own records contradict that assertion. In May 1972, Bush sought a permanent transfer to a postal unit in Alabama that didn’t require weekend drills or active duty. Guard headquarters overruled that decision. Bush did not do any drills from May through September 1972. In September 1972, Bush won approval to do temporary "alternative" training at the 187th Squadron in Montgomery. He was cleared to attend weekend drills in October and November. But two of the 187th’s officers said Bush never appeared. One of them, retired Brig. Gen. William Turnipseed, says he is "dead-certain he didn’t show up." Bush, who refuses all interviews on the subject, says he was there, but can’t remember anything he did. His campaign can find no records to corroborate this..."

Also see Talion.com for a copy of the report from May 1973 signed by his superiors stating that Bush stopped flying after May 1972. 

Talion.com:
"...The tattered piece of attendance record (which lists no months, years, or last name) which the Bush campaign presented as evidence of attending Air National Guard training is not even from the Air National Guard. This incomplete scrap of paper is from the Air Force Reserve punishment unit, not the Air National Guard. (13) Note the ARF (Air Reserve Force) listing at the top, rather than the ANG designator, which would indicate it was from the Air National Guard..."

Talion.com:
"...1. A September 29, 1972 Air National Guard confirming orders “suspending 1st Lt. George W. Bush from flying status are confirmed...Reason for Suspension: Failure to accomplish annual medical exam.”...4. In Fall 1973, as an automatic disciplinary action, Bush was reassigned to the Obligated Reserve Section in Denver, because he disobeyed orders to show up for a mandatory flight physical and therefore was unable to fulfill the last two years of his six-year obligation as an Air National Guard jet fighter pilot..."

Daily Howler:
"...
Andrew Sullivan suggests that Paul Krugman has glossed the facts of the “missing year” case. Sullivan refers to a New York Times report of November 3, 2000. The report directly referenced Robinson’s prior work; in it, Jo Thomas judged that “some of [Robinson’s] concerns may be unfounded. Documents reviewed by The Times showed that Mr. Bush served in at least 9 of the 17 months in question.” Thomas’ short, 539-word piece was, in fact, quite sketchy. Even she found a “seven-month gap” (April 1972 to November 1972) in which Bush performed no service. In some ways, Thomas even seemed a bit slick. For example, she quoted General Turnipseed in such a way as to suggest that Bush had served in Alabama (see Sullivan’s item today). But she failed to mention Turnipseed’s repeated statements that Bush had not served there..." 

Also see this Daily Howler series for a detailed examination of the above.

2
BS5-05 Air National Guard Bush

"I can't remember what I did, but I wasn't flying because they didn't have the same airplanes. I fulfilled my obligations."

Democrats.com:
"...
On June 26th this report appeared in the Dallas Morning News. “Campaigning Friday in Tuscaloosa, Ala., Bush was asked about his 1972 service in that state. "I was there on a temporary assignment and fulfilled my weekends at one period of time," he said. "I made up some missed weekends." "I can't remember what I did, but I wasn't flying because they didn't have the same airplanes. I fulfilled my obligations."  
The Truth
He was no longer flying because he had been suspended in August of 1972 for failure to “accomplish” a required medical exam. [Boston Globe, 5/23/00] (Suspension document at http://www.cis.net/~coldfeet/grounded.gif
Bush was suspended from flying on August 1, 1972, prior to his request for the transfer to the187th at Montgomery Alabama, September 5, 1972.  Bush did not receive permission until September 15, which was close to six weeks after his suspension from flying.
Another question is raised by the fact that he cannot remember what he did for the Air National Guard in Alabama, despite the fact that 28 years later he still remembers the specifics of his work there on the campaign of William Blount as cited in a July 22, 2000 New York Times article. “In an interview 28 years later, Mr. Bush remembered the numbers. "We all teamed together and helped Red get about 36 percent of the vote," he said with a short laugh, "in spite of the fact that Nixon had gotten 72 percent of the vote. The ticket-splitting was phenomenal."”..."
1
BS5-06 Air National Guard Bush

"...As for Mr. Bush’s curious failure to take the annual physical in 1972, the only excuse he has offered is that he was in Alabama working on a Republican Senate campaign and couldn’t get back to Houston for a checkup by his personal physician..."

Joe Conason (New York Observer):
"...That, too, is blatantly untrue. For as Mr. Bush surely knows—having undergone such examinations in previous years—only a certified Air Force flight surgeon may conduct a pilot physical..."

RealChange:
"...his story also changed on why he refused to take a medical exam -- including a drug test - in 1972. (The refusal ended Bush's flying career.) His staff first claimed that he didn't take the physical because he was in Alabama and his personal physician was in Houston. But flight physicals can be administered only by certified Air Force flight surgeons, and there were surgeons assigned at the time to Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, where Bush was living. His staff now admits that that explanation was "wrong", without saying where it came from or what the real reason was..."

1
BS5-07 Air National Guard Bush

"...[claimed that] he tried to volunteer for service in Vietnam "to relieve active-duty pilots."..."

Joe Conason (New York Observer):
"...The twists and turns of Mr. Bush’s military record are too complex for an exhaustive analysis in this space. Among the questionable claims in his book is that he tried to volunteer for service in Vietnam "to relieve active-duty pilots." In a more candid mood in 1998, however, he told a reporter for The Fort Worth Star-Telegram, "I don’t want to play like I was somebody out there marching [to war] when I wasn’t. It was either Canada or the service and I was headed into the service."..."

RealChange:
"...He has stated on several occasions that he did not want to be an infantryman, and acknowledges that he came to oppose the war itself. He claims that he joined the guard to fly planes, and would have been happy to go to Vietnam, but ignores the obvious choice of the Air Force or the Navy -- which his dad, a genuine war hero, joined. Furthermore, when he signed up for the Guard, he checked a box saying "Do not volunteer for overseas service." Later, he made a perfunctory application to transfer to a program called "Palace Alert", which dispatched F-102 pilots to Europe or the Far East -- and just occasionally Vietnam -- for 3 or 6 month assignments. But Bush was not nearly qualified, as he must have known, and was immediately turned down, and the F-102 not used overseas after June, 1970 in any case..."

1
BS5-08 Air National Guard Bush

"...Bush has said no one to his knowledge helped him get into the National Guard. “I asked to become a pilot,” Bush said. “I met the qualifications, and ended up becoming an F-102 pilot,” The Associated Press reported. Bush insisted that he knew of no special treatment. [AP, July 5, 1999] ..."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...But the record indicates that, despite having the lowest acceptable score for entry, Bush jumped over other young men waiting to get into the National Guard. Other accounts suggest that a “good friend” of Bush’s father, George H.W. Bush, then a congressman from Houston who supported the war, weighed in with Ben Barnes, the Texas Speaker of the House, to arrange a slot for George W. Bush. [The Guardian (U.K.), July 29, 1999]. Sometime in late 1967 or early 1968, Barnes “personally asked the top official of the Texas Air National Guard to help George W. Bush obtain a pilot's slot in a Guard fighter squadron,” The Washington Post reported. [Sept. 21, 1999]. On Sept. 27, 1999, Barnes submitted a sworn statement that he helped Bush by contacting Brig. Gen. James M. Rose..."

RealChange:
"...
On May 27, 1968, George Bush Jr. was 12 days away from losing his student draft deferment, at a time when 350 Americans a week were dying in combat. The National Guard, seen by many as the most respectable way to avoid Vietnam, had a huge waiting list -- a year and a half in Texas, over 100,000 men nationwide. Yet Bush and his family friends pulled strings, and the young man was admitted the same day he applied, regardless of any waiting list. 
Bush's unit commander, Col. "Buck" Staudt, was so excited about his VIP recruit that he staged a special ceremony for the press so he could have his picture taken administering the oath (even though the official oath had been given by a captain earlier.)...Of course, it later came out in court that a close Bush friend, Simon Adger, had asked Barnes to get Bush Jr. into the Guard, and that Barnes did so, via General Rose...
George Bush Jr. admits that he knew Adger socially at the time, and further admits that he lobbied Col. "Buck" Staudt, the commander of the VIP unit Bush joined. Staudt claims that he, not General Rose (who he later replaced), was the one who made the decision on admissions anyway. Bush Jr. admits that he met Staudt in late 1967, during Christmas vacation of his senior year, called him later, and -- in Bush's words -- "found out what it took to apply."
When asked how Bush came to call Staudt, his spokeswoman Karen Hughes said he "heard from friends while he was home over the Christmas break that ... Colonel Staudt was the person to contact." She says that Bush doesn't recall who those "friends" were. But we know that Sid Adger was also a friend of Staudt's, served with him on the Houston Chamber of Commerce's Aviation Committee, and in 1967 held a luncheon honoring Gen. Staudt and his unit for winning an Air Force commendation. In fact, both of Adger's sons also joined General Staudt's unit, in 1966 and 1968 respectively..."

1
BS5-09 Air National Guard Bush

Changing reasons for why he was suspended

Democrats.com:
"...
Three different stories on why he was suspended. 

Story #1) "Bush's campaign aides have said he did not take the physical because he was in Alabama and his personal physician was in Houston." [Boston Globe 5/23/00]...

In fact as the Boston Globe goes on to state "flight physicals can be administered only by certified Air Force flight surgeons, and some were assigned at the time to Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, where Bush was living." 

Story #2) Then in June, campaign officials told the London Times Bush did not technically need to take his flight physical. "As he was not flying, there was no reason for him to take the flight physical exam," according to campaign spokesman Don Bartlett.  

Any suggestion that he had simply decided to “give up flying” prior to his suspension, with two years remaining on his commitment and nearly one million dollars (in real terms) invested in his training is not plausible.  It is not up to an Air National Guard pilot to decide whether or not he “intends” to fly. 
“If he had come back to Houston, I would have kept him flying the 102 until he got out” said retired Major Bobby W. Hodges [Boston Glove 5/23/00]

Story #3) In the same article, Bush campaign spokesman Dan Bartlett told the newspaper that Bush was aware back then that he would be suspended for missing his medical exam, but had no choice because he had applied for a transfer from Houston to Alabama and his paperwork hadn't caught up with him. "It was just a question of following the bureaucratic procedure of the time," Bartlett said. "He knew the suspension would have to take place." 

The exam was required to be completed in the three months preceding his birthday, July 6, 1972. A three month window seems adequate to avoid being suspended from flying. 

So which is it: his family physician, he didn’t have to take the exam, or a bureaucratic snafu?..."

1
BS6-01 Drunken driving arrest/
conviction
Bush

"..."I asked him if he'd ever been arrested after 1968," when the wreath incident took place, Slater recalled. "And [Bush] said, 'No.'" ..."

Jake Tapper (Salon) via RealChange:
"...he had been arrested for driving while intoxicated in Maine in 1976, at the age of 30...
In the midst of Bush's gubernatorial reelection effort, Slater reported that while in college, Bush had been arrested for stealing a Christmas wreath from a New Haven, Conn., hotel. Cornering Bush in the press room of the State Capitol in Austin, Texas, after a press conference, Slater pressed Bush on his arrest record. "I asked him if he'd ever been arrested after 1968," when the wreath incident took place, Slater recalled. "And he said, 'No.'" Slater emphasized the context of the conversation, however, and his gut feeling now that Bush was on the brink of disclosing the 1976 drunken-driving arrest to him. "When he said the word 'no,' clearly he wasn't telling the truth," Slater said. But, Slater said, he then asked Bush if "had he ever been arrested before 1968, and he said, 'Well ...,' and I felt he may have been ready to correct what he had just said, but [Bush spokeswoman] Karen Hughes stepped in and stopped the interview." "

Note RealChange: "...Before 1968, Bush was arrested for theft and vandalism in college..."

1
BS6-02 Drunken driving arrest/
conviction
Bush

"...Bush: "No. I pled -- you know, I said I was wrong and I ..." Reporter: "In court? "
Bush: No, there was no court. I went to the police station. I said, "I'm wrong."..."

RealChange:
"...That is clearly a lie, as you can see on this court document showing his court hearing a month later. In fact, it was a man also in court for DUI the same day who revealed Bush' arrest..."
1
BS6-03 Drunken driving arrest/
conviction
Bush

"...Bush decided to serve jury duty in 1996, during his first year as governor...Then he found himself on a trial for drunk driving...The night before the trial, Bush's lawyer asked the defense attorney to dismiss him, because "it would be improper for a governor to sit on a criminal case in which he could later be asked to grant clemency."..."

RealChange:
"...In another evasion, Bush decided to serve jury duty in 1996, during his first year as governor. On his questionairre, he simply left blank the questions about prior arrests and trials. Then he found himself on a trial for drunk driving, where every juror is eventually asked about prior convictions for drunk driving. The night before the trial, Bush's lawyer asked the defense attorney to dismiss him, because "it would be improper for a governor to sit on a criminal case in which he could later be asked to grant clemency." It's a silly argument, because that problem exists with any criminal trial and Bush had already decided to serve on a jury, but the defense attorney obliged and excused him before direct questioning of jurors began...."
1
BS6-04 Drunken driving arrest/
conviction
Hughes for Bush

"...He has been very forthcoming with the American people that he made mistakes as a youth..."

Issues2000:
"...
Bush aides said he had not disclosed the [drunk driving] incident previously out of concern for his twin daughters. “He has always been very forthcoming in acknowledging that he drank too much in the past, before he quit drinking 14 years ago,” his communications director said. “He had made a decision as a father that he did not want to set that bad example for his daughters or for any other children,” she said.
She was asked if she would have considered it acceptable for President Clinton to have denied involvement with Monica Lewinsky out concern for his daughter Chelsea. “The only time the governor was directly asked if he’d ever been arrested for drinking and driving and he replied, and I quote, ‘I do not have a perfect record,’ ” she replied.
She added, “He has been very forthcoming with the American people that he made mistakes as a youth.” When asked if 30, Bush’s age at the time, qualifies as youthful, she said, “It was before he was married. It was before he had children.” 
Source: Mike Allen and Dan Balz, Washington Post, p. A1 Nov 4, 2000..."
1
BS7-01 Texas funeral home case Bush

"...The Texas governor and front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination sought to avoid testifying in the case by filing an affidavit swearing he "had no conversations with [SCI] officials, agents, or representatives concerning the investigation or any dispute arising from it."..."

Robert Bryce and Anthony York (Salon):
"...The affidavit also stated that Bush never spoke with the Texas Funeral Service Commission about the investigation, and that Bush had "no personal knowledge of relevant facts of the investigation nor do I have any personal knowledge of relevant facts concerning any dispute arising from this investigation." But in a forthcoming story by Newsweek reporter Michael Isikoff, Johnnie B. Rogers, attorney for SCI, said he and Waltrip met with Bush's chief of staff and campaign manager, Joe Allbaugh, on April 15 to hand deliver a letter demanding an end to the investigation.
Bush stuck his head into the meeting, Rogers told Isikoff, and said, "Hey Bobby, are those people still messing with you?" When Waltrip indicated that they were, Bush asked Rogers, "Hey, Johnnie B. Are you taking care of him?" Rogers replied, "I'm doing my best, Governor."...Meanwhile, the silence out of Austin is deafening. The normally gregarious Rogers has apparently been muzzled, and is not speaking to the media. He told Salon News that all questions about the matter should be referred to SCI spokesman Bill Miller. Neither Bush's campaign press team nor his gubernatorial press office returned numerous calls seeking comment..."

Robert Bryce (Salon):
"...The contempt motion puts the spotlight on Bush's sworn affidavit, filed on Aug. 5, in which he said that he has "had no conversations with SCI officials, agents or representatives" about the state's investigation...Since the affidavit was filed, Bush's flat denial has been contradicted several times, even by Bush himself. According to reporters who were with Bush in Iowa last week, when Bush was asked if he talked to Waltrip about the investigation, Bush responded, "I did not. I had only a brief exchange with him that lasted only a few seconds." Bush's press secretary, Linda Edwards, has also described their meeting as an "exchange." The American Heritage Dictionary defines the word "conversation" thusly: "an informal spoken exchange."..."

1
BS8-01 Knowing his own mind   Bush

said "..."I do not need to take your pulse before I know my own mind,"..."

ABC News:
"...“What you’re trying to get me to do is to express the will of the people of South Carolina,” Bush said, dodging an attempt by the moderator of the GOP presidential debate to pin him down on a divisive, racially charged issue. The crowd at the rowdy forum tried to shout down moderator Brian Williams, an MSNBC anchor, as he pressed Bush to take a position on the flag. Bush refused to bite. “I don’t believe it’s the role of someone from outside South Carolina and someone running for president to come into this state and tell the people of South Carolina what to do with their business when it comes to the flag,” Bush said..."

Compassiongate
The bottomline is why does one need to take the pulse of people in SC to state one's personal view on whether or not something is right?

1
BS9-01 His so-called contempt for Washington Bush

Claimed he was not like the standard pols from D.C.

Daily Howler:
"...Last week, for example, after Bush explained how much he despised D.C. ways, a purloined memo revealed an odd fact: those Washington lobbyists the governor hated were being asked to go to Iowa, to work on Dub's straw poll effort. But only Jim Drinkard dared to hint it: Darling Bush seemed to be saying one thing, and doing exactly the other..."
1
BS9-02 His so-called contempt for Washington Bush

said "...I’ve never lived in Washington in my life..."

Daily Howler:
"...The first part of Bush’s answer—“I’ve never lived in Washington in my life”— was oddly unresponsive to Bloom’s question, but as a soundbite, it made perfect sense. Bush was painting himself as an “outsider,” as almost all candidates try to do...
But Bush’s statement was more than a stretch; his statement to Bloom was blatantly false. In 1987 and 1988, Bush had spent what the Washington Post later called “an 18-month stint in Washington as a full-time paid aide to his father’s 1988 [presidential] campaign.” Nor was this part of his life a secret. For example, in Eric Pooley’s profile of Bush in the 6/21/99 Time (released 6/13), Pooley described how, in 1986, Bush “sold his ailing company [Spectrum] for a miraculous profit and moved his family to Washington, where he worked on his father’s 1988 presidential campaign.”..."
1
BS10-01 Changing the "tone" and
being against negative campaigning 
Bush

"...made as a centerpiece of his campaign the theme that he would change the “tone” of Washington and restore “dignity” to the White House..."

also indicated that he was against negative campaigning

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...Yet, during the Republican primaries, the Bush campaign targeted Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., for personal attacks. By fall 1999, McCain, who spent five years in a North Vietnamese prisoner of war camp, had narrowed Bush’s lead and the Bush assault began. ..Bush’s negative attacks intensified after McCain won the New Hampshire primary...As McCain remained a threat, Bush’s campaign ran a misleading ad attacking the senator for not supporting breast cancer research...
After securing the Republican nomination, Bush renewed his pledge to run a positive general election campaign. 
But again, the promise lasted only until the governor found himself lagging in the polls. Bush again broke his promise, unleashing his campaign to tear down Gore’s character, ironically, targeting Gore’s credibility. The news media observed the changed tactics but took little notice of how Bush was violating his own pledge..."

Jake Tapper (Salon):
"...
After Bush lost the Feb. 1 New Hampshire primary to McCain, he and his team made the tactical decision to get ugly in South Carolina. In the weeks leading up to the South Carolina primary on Feb. 19, McCain suffered one of the dirtiest personal smear campaigns in modern American political history. "We play it different down here," one of Bush's top South Carolina advisors told Time magazine in February. "We're not dainty, if you get my drift. We're used to playin' rough." Indeed. Push polls attacked McCain's personal life and exaggerated his role in the Keating savings and loan scandal. Leaflets slammed his wife, Cindy, for her past addiction to painkillers. An e-mail from a Bob Jones University professor accused McCain of fathering children out of wedlock. A mysterious public action committee in favor of the Confederate flag -- called "Keep it Flying" -- sprang up overnight and slammed McCain in 250,000 leaflets. .."

(1 for lying compassion about what he would/ would not do and 1 for misleading and offensive personal attack ads against McCain compassionate ads)

BS11-01 Harken Bush

"...Bush explicitly said, during the [Ann] Richards debate, that he had been “exonerated” by the SEC’s [Harken] probe..."

Daily Howler:
"...Bush’s campaign had asked the SEC to issue a statement about the matter. In a letter to Bush’s lawyer, the SEC said, “the investigation has been terminated as to the conduct of Mr. Bush, and…at this time, no enforcement action is contemplated with respect to him.” But the letter also said that this “must in no way be construed as indicating that the party has been exonerated or that no action may ultimately result.” Despite this, Bush explicitly said, during the Richards debate, that he had been “exonerated” by the SEC’s probe. Why, you could almost say he embellished the facts!..."
1
BS11-02 Harken

Bush 
during Campaign 2000: "..."In my administration, we will ask not only what is legal but what is right," Bush said. "...Not just what the lawyers allow, but what the public deserves. In my administration, we'll make it clear there is a controlling legal authority of conscience."..."

Eric Alterman (MSNBC/WLM page 172):
"...
As a director of Harken Energy Corporation, Bush failed to comply with SEC regulations regarding the legal deadlines for revealing his purchasing and selling of the company’s stock. As a result, Bush profited by concealing the fact that he was buying and selling hundreds of thousands of shares of stock..."

Compassiongate
: Regardless of whether the sale itself was legal or illegal, I only choose to apply to Mr. Bush the standards he seeks to apply to the rest of us.
1
BS12-01 Guilt by association Bush

"...A few weeks ago I visited Bob Jones University in South Carolina to address its students and outline the reasons I am seeking the presidency. Some have taken and mistaken this visit as a sign that I approve of the anti-Catholic and racially divisive views associated with that school...Criticism should be expected in any political campaign. What no American should expect and what I will not tolerate is guilt by association..."

MWO:

"...As is common practice during his stump speeches, Bush took a veiled jab at President Clinton by asserting that the Monica Lewinsky scandal has sullied the White House, and that he was the candidate best suited to "usher in a new era."
"I think you can judge the nature of a man by the company his keeps..."
Source (Bush in Blue Ash, OH)

Mr. Keyes and Mr. Bush decried what they perceived as the nation's moral decay, with Mr. Bush declaring, "You can judge the nature of a man by the company he keeps,'' and noting that his "priority is faith, family and this great country called America.''
Source (Bush in Aiken, SC)

"I know you can judge the character of a man by the company he keeps," said Bush.
Source (Bush in Oakland, PA)..."

1
BS13-01 Campaign claim  Bush

In a mailing he cited "...a New York Times Magazine article to suggest its support, "He (Bush) has a clear and compelling idea in his mind of where he wants to take the nation."..."

BAND:
"...CNN's "Inside Politics" pointed out in August 1999 that the actual quote was, "Bush says, if he runs, it will be because he has a clear and compelling idea in his mind of where he wants to take the nation." The truth was, as Bernard Shaw said, "It was Bush endorsing Bush." (Salon.com, Oct. 5, 2000)..."
1

 

EXTRAORDINARY COMPASSION IN FLORIDA <go back to the top>

Compassionate conservatism revealed in one of its worst best forms.

Compassion Con credits total = 20

# Topic Gov. Bush or his team's Compassionate statement Some Uncompassionate Facts Compassion Con Credits
FL1-01 Conceding the election Bush campaign

"...Bush aides and supporters suggested that Gore concede the state and the White House if the initial recount and next week's certification show Bush ahead. "We certainly hope that in the best interest of the country the vice president will think carefully about his talk of lawsuits and endless recounts," said Bush's spokeswoman, Karen Hughes..."

Sam Parry (Consortium News):
"...
In the days before the Nov. 7 election, Republicans feared that Vice President Al Gore might win the Electoral College while Texas Gov. George W. Bush could win the national popular vote...That could allow Gore to amass the 270 electoral votes needed for winning the presidency while blocking a Gore plurality in the popular vote.
To stop Gore under those circumstances, advisers to the Bush campaign weighed the possibility of challenging the legitimacy of a popular-vote loser gaining the White House. "The one thing we don't do is roll over -- we fight," said a Bush aide, according to an article by Michael Kramer in the New York Daily News on Nov. 1, a week before the election. The article reported that "the core of the emerging Bush strategy assumes a popular uprising, stoked by the Bushies themselves, of course. In league with the campaign -- which is preparing talking points about the Electoral College's essential unfairness -- a massive talk-radio operation would be encouraged." "We'd have ads, too," said a Bush aide, "and I think you can count on the media to fuel the thing big-time. Even papers that supported Gore might turn against him because the will of the people will have been thwarted." The Bush strategy to challenge the Electoral College went even further. "Local business leaders will be urged to lobby their customers, the clergy will be asked to speak up for the popular will and Team Bush will enlist as many Democrats as possible to scream as loud as they can," the article said. "You think 'Democrats for Democracy' would be a catchy term for them?" asked a Bush adviser.
The Bush strategy also would target the members of the Electoral College, the 538 electors who are picked by the campaigns and state party organizations to go to Washington for what is normally a ceremonial function. Many of the electors are not legally bound to a specific candidate. Another article describing the Republican thinking appeared in The Boston Herald on Nov. 3. It also quoted Republican sources outlining plans to rally public sentiment against Gore’s election if he won the Electoral College but lost the popular vote. “The Bush camp, sources said, would likely challenge the legitimacy of a Gore win, casting it as an affront to the people’s will and branding the Electoral College as an antiquated relic,” said the article by Andrew Miga.
“One informal Bush adviser, who declined to be named, predicted Republicans would likely benefit from a storm of public outrage if Bush won the popular vote but was denied the presidency,” the article said. The article quoted the Bush adviser as saying: “That’s what America is all about, isn’t it. I’m sure we would make a strong case.”
The Nov. 7 election turned out differently, however.
Gore appears to be the popular-vote winner by a margin now standing at about 200,000 votes nationwide, while Bush contends that he is the Electoral College winner because he holds a tiny lead in Florida, which would put him over the top in electoral votes. Gone is the Republican talk of challenging the Electoral College as an anti-democratic relic. Gone is the principled stand in defense of the expressed will of the American people. Gone is the outrage over a popular-vote winner – now apparently Al Gore – being “denied the presidency.” Instead, the Bush campaign is denouncing the Gore campaign even for questioning voting irregularities in Florida, though these acknowledged errors likely cost Gore a clear majority in Florida, too..."
2
FL2-01 Impact of election indecision Baker for Bush

"...argued that a continued struggle over the presidential election would jeopardize America's standing in the world. By November 14, he was tying it as well to the stability of American financial markets..."

Win McCormack (The Nation) via WLM:
"...Former Secretary of State Warren Christopher, Baker's equivalent in the Gore camp and someone no doubt unfamiliar with the writings of Foucault (and therefore not having the term discourse at his disposal), referred to Baker's argument about America's standing in the world as a "self-serving myth," and Baker did not raise this canard again. Neither did he again raise the matter of endangering US financial markets..."

Quest:
"...Christopher brushed that claim aside. ``I don't see any threat at the moment,'' he said, adding that America always has ``this period of interregnum'' when administrations change..."

1
FL3-01 Gore and recounts/
lawsuits
Baker for Bush

"...attacked the Gore campaign for attempting to "unduly prolong the country's national presidential election," introducing the phrases "endless challenges" and "unending legal wrangling"..."

Win McCormack (The Nation) via WLM:
"...introducing the phrases "endless challenges" and "unending legal wrangling" when the election dispute was all of three days old (CG emphasis)...The next day, November 11, at a press conference announcing that the Bush campaign had filed suit in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida to block the manual recounts requested by the Gore campaign, thus becoming the first of the two campaigns to initiate "legal wrangling" (a number of private lawsuits related to the election had already been filed but none yet by the Gore campaign itself, something Baker took pains to submerge)..."

Win McCormack (The Nation):
"...It could be said that the Gore effort in Florida foundered in a number of ways and places, two of which were certainly Palm Beach County and Miami-Dade County. In Palm Beach County, in the words of the Los Angeles Times, "Republicans crushed the Democrats." There was more than one reason that the Palm Beach canvassing board missed the new November 26 certification deadline (when Katherine Harris certified Bush as having won by 537 votes), but here is how the Los Angeles Times summarized what happened: "Endless delays, false starts and court challenges by Republicans meant the full recount didn't begin until Friday, November 17." In Miami-Dade, the county with the largest voting population in the state of Florida (and the largest black vote), Republicans succeeded in preventing manual recounting from taking place at all..." 

[CG NOTE- this was prevented by the organized rioting described below]

4
FL4-01 1960 election Baker for Bush

"...said Republicans had twice in the past 40 years decided against challenging closely contested elections. In the case of Vice President Richard Nixon in 1960, and President Gerald R. Ford in 1976, he said the two men ``put the country's interests first.''..."

Gerald Posner (Salon):
"...
One of the most oft-repeated myths in the aftermath of the current presidential election disputes is the claim that Vice President Al Gore should behave more like Richard Nixon, who is cited frequently for having graciously decided not to pursue legal remedies in response to possible voter fraud that might have cost him the 1960 election with John Kennedy. But the notion that Nixon graciously exited is just false.  
The 1960 race was unquestionably close...Nixon was worried about how to challenge the vote and still not be branded in history as a "sore loser." Although he would later claim that President Eisenhower encouraged him to contest the election outcome, that was not true, as the outgoing president withdrew his support for any challenge within a day of the vote. Yet, contrary to modern memory, Nixon and his Republican allies still mounted a massive vote challenge...
It is true that Nixon did quickly concede the election to Kennedy. And while he was careful not to put a public imprimatur on the concerted Republican effort to challenge the election results, he privately not only authorized it, but actively encouraged it.  
A conservative journalist and close Nixon friend, Earl Mazo, of the New York Herald Tribune, launched a press frenzy over possible voter fraud. (He was later Nixon's official biographer.) And not only did Republican senators like Thruston Morton ask for recounts in 11 states just three days after the election, but Nixon aides Bob Finch and Len Hall personally did field checks of votes in almost a dozen states.
The Republicans obtained recounts, involved U.S. Attorneys and the FBI, and even impaneled grand juries in their quest to get a different election result. A slew of lawsuits were filed by Republicans, and unsuccessful appeals to state election commissions routinely followed. However, all their efforts failed to uncover any significant wrongdoing..."

Also see David Greenberg (Slate):
"...Another man, too, believed Nixon was robbed: Nixon. At a 1960 Christmas party, he was heard greeting guests, "We won but they stole it from us." Nixon nursed the grudge for years, and when he was criticized for his Watergate crimes he would cite the Kennedys' misdeeds as precedent. He may have felt JFK's supposed theft entitled him to cheat in 1972. It's an interesting hypothetical: If no pall had been cast over the 1960 election, would Watergate have happened?..."

1
FL5-01 Manual recounts Baker for Bush
"...The manual vote count sought by the Gore campaign would not be more accurate than an automated count. Indeed, it would be less fair and less accurate. Human error, individual subjectivity and decisions to "determine the voter's intent" would replace precision machinery in tabulating millions of small marks and fragile hole punches. There would be countless opportunities for the ballots to be subject to a whole host of risks. The potential for mischief would exist to a far greater degree than in the automated count and recount that these very ballots have already been subjected to. It is precisely...for these reasons that our democracy over the years has moved increasingly from hand counting of votes to machine counting. Machines are neither Republicans nor Democrats--and therefore can be neither consciously nor unconsciously biased. [Emphasis added.]..."

Bush (team)

"..."Machine counts are accurate. Let's not forget, we've had three of them," said Bush spokesman Tucker Eskew. "What on Earth rationale is there for going to a less accurate accounting, other than to come up with a different result?"..."

Win McCormack (The Nation) via WLM:
"...Manual recounting is the method used by the United Nations for settling disputed elections around the globe, and it is also countenanced by the United States when our representatives get involved in observing the resolution of electoral conflicts in other nations. A majority of American states either mandate or permit manual recounting when the differential between the machine vote totals for opposing candidates is within a certain margin. Candidate Bush, while governor, had signed just such a bill in Texas that established the same "intent of the voter" standard set by Florida. Until this particular situation in Florida arose, requiring this particular discourse, no Republican politician I am aware of had ever risen to denounce manual recounting (on the contrary, any number of Republican politicians had taken successful advantage of manual recount provisions), nor have I found any literature on the subject that appeared in the conservative journals. Moreover, the Bush camp gladly accepted the results of manual recounts in Florida when those went in their favor, as the results did in Seminole County, and they had considered plans to contest machine results in Iowa, Wisconsin, New Mexico and Oregon if things did not go their way in Florida. Manufacturers of the punch-card voting machinery used in Florida were also on record as saying that hand counting was a more accurate method of gauging votes than using their machines...
what was Baker saying, in essence? That it is impossible for human beings to hand count votes accurately and honestly, citing as reasons the inevitability of "human error" (machine error is obviously to be preferred), the danger posed by "individual subjectivity," the "potential for mischief" (read, deliberate cheating by Democratic canvassing boards) and even the possibility of people being not only consciously but "unconsciously biased"; at the same time he exalted the superiority of "precise" machines over humans--even machines as grievously and laughably flawed as those that produced the "dimpled," "pregnant" and "hanging" chads...It is safe to say that James Baker probably did not realize that he was challenging, and perhaps fatally undermining, core conservative doctrine..."

Daily Howler:
"...Bush spokesmen have said this all week long (contradicting what Kelly himself said). But two days ago, in Kelly's own paper, a reporter revealed an intriguing point. He described the rules that states maintain for the manual recount of punch-card ballots:
PETER SLEVIN (11/13): [A]s county canvassing boards go about the arduous process [in Florida], at least one appears to be adhering to standards stricter than those in some states, including Texas, that put their rules in writing.
Slevin was describing the Texas law on hand recounts which Bush himself had signed. He described the Lone Star standards: 
SLEVIN: For example, Texas allows ballots to be counted if light shines through the punch hole—the so-called sunlight test abandoned by the Palm Beach County canvassing board Saturday over the objections of Democrats...
Texas, Michigan and Kentucky are among the states that specify rules for examining punch ballots by hand. They set out various tests, including holding up the ballot to see if a light shines through and inspecting the chad, the tiny part of the ballot that would fall away if the ballot were properly punched.
In Texas, a ballot is counted if one of four conditions are met: if light shines through, if two corners of the chad are detached, if the indentation is clear enough or if the ballot reflects "by other means" a clear intent to chose a candidate.
In other words, Bush signed a law which permits procedures more liberal than the ones his spokesmen now denounce. But, by the present rules of the press corps' game, no one engages in the ugly name-calling we've seen from the Post's Twin Hysterics. No one has taken to the Post's op-ed page to call the governor a ruthless dissembler..."

3
FL5-02 Manual recounts Cheney (and others) for Bush

claiming (comparing Florida to Texas) that it is "very different kind of a situation in terms of a manual count. You don't have the kind of problems you have with regard to the punch-card ballots where you're trying to sort out between hanging chads and pregnant chads, all of the problems you've seen in connection with Florida. It's a very different situation..."

Daily Howler:
"...Cheney was clearly right on one thing—there are a limited number of Texas counties which use the punch-card ballots. But according to Slevin, Texas law explicitly says how those punch-cards should be recounted. Here's what his article said:
SLEVIN: Palm Beach [County] announced it would not accept "pregnant" or "dimpled" chads that show an indentation but no evidence of being detached from the ballot, while Texas law allows a ballot to be counted if canvassers see an indentation that shows "a clearly ascertainable intent on the part of the voter to vote."

If Slevin is right, then Cheney turned the facts on their head. It is Texas law that allows "pregnant" and "dimpled" chads to be counted as votes. The Florida counties had set stricter rules for recounting. Here again are the Texas standards as reported by Slevin on Monday:
SLEVIN: Texas, Michigan and Kentucky are among the states that specify rules for examining punch ballots by hand. They set out various tests, including holding up the ballot to see if a light shines through and inspecting the chad, the tiny part of the ballot that would fall away if a hole were properly punched.
In Texas, a ballot is counted if one of four conditions are met: if light shines through, if two corners of the chad are detached, if the indentation is clear enough or if the ballot reflects "by other means" a clear intent to choose a candidate..."

1
FL5-03 Manual recounts Bush

"...Angered by the court's ruling that Florida law permits hand recounts, Bush accused the court of using "the bench to change Florida's election laws and usurp the authority of Florida's election officials."..."

Sam Parry (Consortium News):
"...The Republican presidential nominee then stated that "writing laws is the duty of the legislature; administering laws is the duty of the executive branch." Bush left out the third component of the U.S. system, a fact taught to every American child in grade-school civics class -- that it is the duty of the judiciary to interpret the laws. It is also the responsibility of the courts to resolve differences between parties under the law..."

1
FL6-01 Florida riots Bush campaign

speaking about the court-ordered recounts (from Eric Alterman, WLM page 181): "...If citizens of the United States are voluntarily objecting to the process where the rules change (CG emphasis), and where Democratic officials take these ballots behind closed doors where they can't be observers, I think American citizens are entitled to do that sort of thing..." 

CN: "..."Staffers who joined the effort say there has been an air of mystery to the operation. 'To tell you the truth, nobody knows who is calling the shots,' says one aide...."

"...On Nov. 25, the Bush campaign issued “talking points” to justify the Miami protest, calling it “fitting, proper” and blaming the canvassing board for the disruptions. “The board made a series of bad decisions and the reaction to it was inevitable and well justified,” the Bush campaign said...."

Sam Parry (Consortium News):
"...After the Miami “Brooks Brothers Riot” – named after the protesters’ preppie clothing – no government action was taken beyond the police rescuing several Democrats who were surrounded and roughed up by the rioters. While no legal charges were filed against the Republicans, newly released documents show that at least a half dozen of the publicly identified rioters were paid by Bush’s recount committee [CG emphasis]. The payments to the Republican activists are documented in hundreds of pages of Bush committee records – released grudgingly to the Internal Revenue Service last month, 19 months after the 36-day recount battle ended....The documents show that the Bush organization put on the payroll about 250 staffers, spent about $1.2 million to fly operatives to Florida and elsewhere, and paid for hotel bills adding up to about $1 million. To add flexibility to the travel arrangements, a fleet of corporate jets was assembled, including planes owned by Enron Corp., then run by Bush backer Kenneth Lay, and Halliburton Co., where Dick Cheney had served as chairman and chief executive officer...Jake Tapper’s book on the recount battle, Down and Dirty, provides a list of 12 Republican operatives who took part in the Miami riot. Half of those individuals received payments from the Bush recount committee, according to the IRS records...Three of the Miami protesters are now members of Bush’s White House staff, the Miami Herald reported last month. They include Schlapp, who is now a special assistant to the president; Malphrus, who is now deputy director of the president’s Domestic Policy Council; and Joel Kaplan, another special assistant to the president. [See Miami Herald, July 14, 2002]...The Bush committee records show, too, that Bush’s operation paid for the hotel where the Republican protesters celebrated after the Miami riot at a Thanksgiving Day party...The evidence also is clear that the Bush campaign organized the transportation of Republican activists across state lines into Florida. As early as mid-November, the Bush campaign called on activists to rush to Florida and promised to pay their expenses. “We now need to send reinforcements,” the Bush campaign said in an appeal to Republicans on Nov. 18, 2000. “The campaign will pay airfare and hotel expenses for people willing to go.” [See Tapper’s Down and Dirty.]...“This is the new Republican Party, sir!” Brad Blakeman, Bush’s campaign director of advance travel logistics, bellowed into a bullhorn to disrupt a CNN correspondent interviewing a Democratic congressman. “We’re not going to take it anymore!”...Bush himself did nothing to temper the inflammatory rhetoric. Nor did he urge his supporters to respect the legally sanctioned vote counting...The Wall Street Journal added more details, including the fact that Bush offered personal words of encouragement to the rioters in a conference call to a Bush campaign-sponsored celebration on the night of Thanksgiving Day, one day after the canvassing board assault..."
3
FL7-01 Pat Buchanan "stronghold"

Bush campaign

"...Bush Campaign spokesman Ari Fleischer last week issued a statement that called Palm Beach County "a Pat Buchanan stronghold"...and criticized the Gore Campaign for making an issue of "these routine and predictable events...They made this claim, according to the release, based on the fact that "16,695 voters in Palm Beach County are registered to the Independent Party, the Reform Party, or the American Reform Party."..."

UMD Source:
"...
An analysis by ABCNEWS, however, shows that the Reform Party, for whom Buchanan is running, accounts for only 337 of the 16,695 registered voters for the three parties. The Independent party has 16,336 registered voters in Palm Beach and the American Reform Party 22. The Independent Party claims no connection whatsoever to Buchanan or the Reform Party, though a party official says it's possible some members might have voted for him. When confronted with the facts above, Bush campaign spokesman Ari Fleischer told ABCNEWS the distinction between the Reform Party and Independent Party didn't matter. Pat Buchanan ran as an independent (small "i"), so people in the Independent Party might be more inclined to vote for him, he suggested. When asked to provide proof there was a connection between the party and Buchanan, or whether Buchanan ever campaigned for Independent Party members, he said, "the press release speaks for itself."..."

Prof. Christopher Carroll (Johns Hopkins University):
"...Several Republican officials have argued that the high Buchanan vote in Palm Beach County might have been legitimate because Palm Beach County was a `Buchanan stronghold.' However, in the 1996 Republican primary where Buchanan was a candidate, he did very badly in Palm Beach County, receiving only 15.3 percent of the vote compared to his statewide average of 25.3 percent.4 Furthermore, Buchanan himself has now disputed the claim that Palm Beach county is a Buchanan stronghold.5
Another possibility is that the Reform party, whose candidate Buchanan was this year, is particularly popular in Palm Beach County. However, Ross Perot, the 1996 Reform Party presidential nominee, gained only 7.8 percent of the vote in the 1996 Presidential election, compared to a statewide average of 11.8 percent.
Finally, as a measure of whether Palm Beach county is generally more conservative than the rest of Florida, we can examine the vote split between Bill Clinton and Bob Dole in 1996. In the typical county in Florida, Dole garnered 44.7 percent of the popular vote in the 1996 election. In Palm Beach County, he received only 33.9 percent of the vote. President Clinton received 54.8 percent of the Palm Beach vote, compared to a statewide average of only 43.4 percent. And the 2000 Republican Senatorial candidate, Bill McCollum, received only 36 percent of the vote in Palm Beach county, compared with a statewide average of 48.7 percent.
In sum, there is no evidence that Palm Beach county is either a Buchanan stronghold, a Reform Party stronghold, or a conservative stronghold. Indeed, the opposite seems to be true...we can say with greater than 99.99999 percent confidence that if the erroneous Buchanan votes had been votes for Gore, Gore would be leading in the vote count at the moment. In other words, there is less than one chance in ten million (because 10 million = 1/(1-0.9999999)) that Bush would be ahead without the erroneous Buchanan ballots...."

2
FL8-01 Electoral process Bush campaign

"...faced with the Florida Supreme Court ruling requiring a statewide recount of so-called "under-votes,"...lawyers have rushed to federal court seeking to stall the state-court-ordered recount until after Dec. 12...Bush’s lawyers argued that the vote counting was a threat to “the integrity of the electoral process” and could cause Bush "irreparable injury."..."

Consortium News:
"...
In a better-late-than-never look at the mess that was the Florida vote count, The Washington Post discovered what critics of George W. Bush’s “victory” have long alleged – that his 537-vote margin benefited from a host of irregularities, many traceable to his brother’s administration or to post-election Republican maneuvering. 
The Post's most important new discovery might be evidence that Bush's side padded its lead with scores of absentee votes that were cast after Election Day or did not meet legal standards.
Those votes were counted in heavily Republican counties – though not in Democratic strongholds – after the Bush campaign rallied its supporters and the national news media to condemn Al Gore's campaign for initially demanding that legal requirements be followed...The Post reported that “at least 17 ballots examined by the Post in four north Florida counties were counted despite bearing postmarks dated after Nov. 7. Scores more were counted after arriving without postmarks in elections offices between Nov. 8 and Nov. 17, the deadline for overseas absentee ballots to be received.” 
Republican operatives and sympathetic pundits condemned Gore as unpatriotic for insisting that legal standards be met for these ballots [CG emphasis], many coming from American soldiers stationed overseas. When Gore's side relented and let many of these ballots be included, “the result was a rout of the Democrats in the northern counties, where Bush picked up 176 votes that lacked postmarks and other required features,” the Post said. 
But the Bush forces followed a different strategy in counties of south Florida with high numbers of African-American, Hispanic and Jewish voters, according to the Post's study. “Elsewhere, particularly in Democratic counties, canvassing boards saw things the opposite way – as did the Bush forces, who demanded that strict state rules be followed [CG emphasis],” the Post reported. “In overwhelmingly Democratic Broward County, elections officials rejected 304 overseas ballots for various technical reasons, including 119 because they lacked postmarks. Miami-Dade invalidated about 200; Volusia threw out 43 and Orange 117. All three counties voted Democratic...

...the Post also reported that: 
--At least a couple of thousand voters were improperly removed from Florida’s voting rolls under an extraordinary effort by Gov. Jeb Bush’s administration to purge ex-felons. State officials specifically ordered that “false positives” – meaning voters whose names and other personal data did not match those of actual felons – still be put in lists sent to county canvassing boards.
--Irregularities from this felon purge and from malfunctioning voting machines fell disproportionately on African-American voters, who favored Gore by 9-to-1. Even without the error-plagued felon purge, Florida’s strict rules against restoring civil rights of past felons have disqualified “31 percent of the state’s black men,” the Post said. That suggests Florida officials were well aware of the likely impact on the African-American vote from an aggressive “felon” purge.
..
18 of the state’s 67 counties “never recounted the ballots at all,” only rechecking the tallies of the original results. “To this day, more than 1.58 million votes [or about one-quarter of Florida's total] have not been counted a second time,” the Post said. Some county officials blamed the divergent recount procedures on Secretary of State Katherine Harris, a Bush loyalist, who provided no guidance on how to proceed....
Gore “likely lost about 6,500 votes” in Palm Beach because of the poorly designed “butterfly ballot” that confused many elderly Jewish voters, according to the Post's analysis. In other counties, many more ballots were despoiled by confusion resulting from a “wraparound” ballot developed by Harris’ office, the Post said.”..."

2

 

OTHER <go back to the top>

Compassion Con credits total = 19

# Topic Gov. Bush or his team's Compassionate statement Some Uncompassionate Facts Compassion Con Credits
OT1-01 Food as diplomatic weapon Bush

"..."I don't want to use food as a diplomatic weapon from this point forward. We shouldn't be using food. It hurts the farmers. It's not the right thing to do."..."

Michael Kinsley (Dawn/WP):
"...When, just a few days later, he criticized legislation weakening the trade embargo on Cuba - which covers food along with everything else - had he rethought his philosophy on this issue? Or was there nothing to rethink?..."

Sally Kalson (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette):
"...He says we shouldn't use food as a diplomatic weapon, yet he supports the trade embargo on Cuba, which uses food as a weapon...."

1
OT2-01 Peacekeeping forces Bush

(said) "...I hope our European friends become the peacekeepers in Bosnia and the Balkans. I hope that they put the troops on the ground, so that we can withdraw our troops and focus our military on fighting and winning war..."

Eric Alterman (MSNBC/WLM page 172):
"......ignoring the fact that 85% of peacekeeping troops in Kosovo are already European..."
1
OT3-01 Running a frugal campaign Bush and his team

claimed that they were "frugal" in their campaign spending

Daily Howler:
"...Dan Balz, on last night's NewsHour, discussed the fact that the Bush campaign has spent $19 million to date:

BALZ: The Bush campaign has prided itself, and bragged really, that it is a frugal campaign, a skinflint campaign, that they watch all their pennies. The reality is they are spending money at a much higher rate than Al Gore, who has gotten a lot of criticism for the amount of money his campaign has spent..."

1
OT4-01 Texas' carrying-a-
concealed-weapon law (CCW)
Bush

"..."You think it's perfectly all right for people to carry concealed weapons into churches across the country?" Couric asked. "No, no, no," Bush said to Couric, "but churches ... no, I didn't say that. Churches in our state of Texas do not let ... if they don't want somebody doing that, it won't happen. The reason that part of the bill was passed is because preachers wanted to be able to carry a concealed weapon in their own home on church grounds. But people aren't carrying guns in churches in Texas."..."

Jake Tapper (Salon):
"...The 1995 CCW law prohibited Texans from carrying concealed handguns into official sporting events, bars, correctional facilities, amusement parks, hospitals, nursing homes and "established places of worship." So Bush went back in 1997 and extended the law so the CCW holders could carry their guns into places like churches, amusement parks and rest homes...It is true that Bush didn't "say that" -- but he did sign it into law...But why would Bush sign a law allowing CCW holders to carry their guns into churches if he didn't think people were "carrying guns in churches in Texas"? Wasn't that the idea?..."

 

1
OT4-02 Trigger-lock giveaway proposal Bush spokesman

"...Governor Bush has a strong record here in Texas, and in fact the law that he talked about President Clinton actually said was a good idea on Friday," Tucker said..."

Jake Tapper (Salon):
"...When asked what Clinton thought about Bush's new trigger-lock giveaway, Clinton did indeed, say, "I think it's a good idea," but that was immediately followed by his question: "But why -- why is he doing that? "You have to understand what's going on here," Clinton said, answering his own question in his inimitable fashion. "There was a report in the newspaper last week that a lobbyist from the NRA said they would have an office in the White House if Governor Bush was elected." Bush, Clinton said, "wants to move away from that image. He wants people not to think that he won't do anything -- basically that the NRA will control policy on this. Which they will if he wins. And if he comes out and gives away gun trigger locks, then he doesn't have to explain why we're still importing large-capacity ammunition clips and why he doesn't want to close the gun-show loophole." That's something that Bush's "little birdie" forgot to mention. .."
1
OT4-03 Background checks for gun buyers Bush

"...I don't think we ought to be selling guns to people who shouldn't have them. That's why I support instant background checks at gun shows. One of the reasons we have an instant background check is so that we instantly know whether or not someone should have a gun or not..."

Jerry Politex (Bushwatch/Tom Paine):
"...Fact: "Bush overstates the effectiveness of instant background checks for people trying to buy guns.... The Los Angeles Times reported on Oct. 3 that during Bush's term as governor, Texas granted licenses for carrying concealed guns to hundreds of people with criminal records and histories of drug problems, violence or psychological disorders." Washington Post, 10/12/00 "He didn't mention that Texas failed to perform full background checks on 407 people who had prior criminal convictions but were granted concealed handgun licenses under a law he signed in 1995. Of those, 71 had convictions that should have excluded them from having a concealed gun permit, the Texas Department of Public Safety acknowledged." AP, 10/12/00..."
1
OT5-01 Former Russian PM and IMF Bush's

"...accusation that former Russian prime minister Viktor Chernomyrdin stole money from the International Monetary Fund. .."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...Bush’s accusation against Chernomyrdin, aimed at undercutting Gore’s work on economic and political reform in Russia, was imprecise and not supported by the known factual record.
There have been suspicions of misconduct against Chernomyrdin, but they have not involved the IMF. After the debate, Chernomyrdin angrily denied Bush’s IMF accusations, which the campaign did not buttress with specific evidence..."
1
OT5-02 IMF loans Bush

"...Discussing International Loans: "And there's some pretty egregious examples recently, one being Russia where we had IMF loans that ended up in the pockets of a lot of powerful people and didn't help the nation."..."

Jerry Politex (Bushwatch/Tom Paine):
"...Fact: Bush’s own vice presidential candidate, Dick Cheney, lobbied for U.S.-backed loan to Russia that helped his own company. "Halliburton Co. lobbied for and received $ 292 million in loan guarantees to develop one of the world's largest oil fields in Russia. Cheney said: 'This is exactly the type of project we should be encouraging if Russia is to succeed in reforming its economy...We at Halliburton appreciate the support of the Export-Import Bank and look forward to beginning work on this important project.’" PR Newswire 4/6/2000. The State Department, armed with a CIA report detailing corruption by Halliburton’s Russian partner, invoked a seldom-used prerogative and ordered suspension of the loan. The loan guarantee "ran counter to America's ‘national interest,’" the State Department ruled. New Republic, 8/7/00..."
1
OT6-01 High schooling Bush

(trying to create a populist image when he) "...often said that “the biggest difference between me and my father is that he went to Greenwich Country Day and I went to San Jacinto Junior High.”..."

  Daily Howler:
"...there was much less to Bush’s San Jacinto mantra than actually met the eye. In fact, Bush attended San Jacinto for one year only—seventh grade. After that, he moved to the tony Kinkaid School, an elite private school in Houston. After two years at the Kinkaid School, he became an Andover boarder. In short, Bush spent five years at elite private schools, and one year at San Jacinto Junior High. But it was San Jacinto he repeatedly mentioned, for reasons that were perfectly plain..."
1
OT7-01 Federal funding to states for illegal immigration costs Bush

"...asked "if he would reimburse California for the estimated billions of dollars the state spends annually on services and education for illegal immigrants," wrote the Chronicle's Carla Marinucci. "'No,' said the GOP front-runner. Asked for a reason, Bush said, 'Because that's not a federal role, in my judgment.'..."

Jerry Politex (Salon):
"...Republicans and Democrats both expressed surprise, noting that Texas -- under Bush's own administration -- has tried to recover such costs."
Days later, according to the New York Times, Bush spinner Mindy Tucker said her boss believed that the feds should compensate states, contrary to what was previously reported in the Chronicle. Tucker said Bush misunderstood the reporter's question..."
1
OT8-01 Statements from Texas Gubernatorial campaign Bush

"...At another point, he memorably said, “I proudly proclaim I’ve never held office. I have been in the business world all my adult life. I have met a payroll. I know what it means to risk capital.”..."

"...embellished his description of Richards, slamming her as a career politician. “If Texans want someone who has spent her entire adult life in politics, they should not vote for me,” he said..."

Daily Howler:
"...What made this presentation so comical? Bush had “never held office” for one major reason; when he ran for office in 1978, the voters had (narrowly) turned his bid down. That was Bush’s race for Congress; he had also explored the possibility of running for the Texas state senate in 1972, and for governor in 1990. Meanwhile, Bush embellished his description of Richards, slamming her as a career politician. “If Texans want someone who has spent her entire adult life in politics, they should not vote for me,” he said. Hmmm. Richards first ran for office at age 43. Bush, by contrast, was 32 when he spent a year running for Congress..."
2
OT9-01 Property Rights Bush

said he would "...do everything I can to defend the power of private property and private property rights,..."

Eric Alterman (MSNBC/WLM page 172):
"...
he and his partners in the Texas Rangers arranged for Texas authorities to expropriate private land to allow the investors their new baseball stadium. When some resisted, or balked at the low prices being offered, their land was condemned and expropriated it by force of law. This involved 270 acres of land, even though only about 17 acres were needed for the ballpark. The rest was used by Bush and his cronies for commercial development, and has provided the basis of his personal fortune..."
1
OT10-01 Africa Bush

"...Africa is important and we've got to do a lot of work in Africa to promote democracy and trade..."

Jerry Politex (Bushwatch/Tom Paine):
"...Fact "While Africa may be important, it doesn't fit into the national strategic interests, as far as I can see them," Bush said earlier. When he was asked for his vision of the U.S. national interests, he named every continent except Africa. According to Time magazine, "[Bush] focused exclusively on big ticket issues ... Huge chunks of the globe -- Africa and Latin America, for example -- were not addressed at all." Time, 12/6/99; PBS "News Hour," 2/16/00; Toronto Star, 2/16/00..."
1
OT11-01 Election to Governor Bush

"...There's only been one governor ever elected to back-to-back four year terms and that was me..."

Jerry Politex (Bushwatch/Tom Paine):
"...Fact: The governors who served two consecutive four-year terms (meeting Bush's statement criteria are): Coke R. Stevenson (2 consecutive 4-year terms) August 4, 1941-January 21, 1947. Allan Shivers (2 consecutive four-year terms) July 11, 1949-January 15, 1957. Price Daniel (2 consecutive four-year terms) January 15, 1957-January 15, 1963. John Connally (2 consecutive four-year terms) January 15, 1963-January 21, 1969. Dolph Briscoe (2 consecutive four-year terms) January 16, 1973-January 16, 1979. George W. Bush (2 consecutive four-year terms) January 17, 1995 to present. Texas State Libraries and Archives Commission..."
1
OT11-02 Hispanic vote obtained as Governor Bush

"...claimed that he had support from 50% of Hispanics in his last gubernatorial race in the second debate..."

Jim Yardley (New York Times) - found via BAND:
"...
Even today, there is debate in Texas about how well Mr. Bush did with Hispanics in 1998. He won 69 percent of the overall vote, and he has claimed winning 49 percent of the Hispanic vote, based on an initial exit poll. But that figure is remarkably high for a Republican, and later exit polls and academic studies suggest his actual total was as low as 33 percent, still high for a Republican but not as impressive.
"They use the 50 percent, and that's just false," said Dr. Rodolfo de la Garza, head of the Tomás Rivera Policy Institute at the University of Texas, who has studied the race. He cautioned against using the 1998 race as a gauge of Mr. Bush's potential appeal because turnout was very low and the challenger was very weak..."
1
OT12-01 School vouchers Bush

"...Vouchers are up to states. If you want to do a voucher program in Missouri, fine. See, I strongly believe in local control of schools. I'm a governor of a state, and I don't like it when the federal government tells us what to do. I'm for local control of schools..."

Jerry Politex (Bushwatch):
"...Fact: " Bush's education plan forces states to divert money to vouchers at federal discretion." (ABC.)..."

Jacob Weisberg (MSN/Slate):
"...As it turns out, Gore is entirely correct. It's right here in the fine print on Bush's Web site, on the fact sheet that accompanied a speech he gave in Los Angeles more than a year ago titled "No Child Left Behind." According to this policy paper, Bush would require that all states:
... offer parents of these students [those in schools judged to be failing after three years] portable funds, which can be used to obtain for their child an education at a school of their choice or supplemental education services. These funds (worth an average $1,500 per child) will consist of the student's pro rata share of Title 1 funds, provided by the Local Education Agency, and an equal amount provided by the state from its federal or state funds [italics added].
In other words, Bush does obviate local control and require states to help pay for vouchers for students in failing schools. It's not just federal cuff link--it's an unfunded, or at least an underfunded mandate! In the past, I've criticized Bush's voucher plan by arguing that $1,500 is an amount better suited to paying for weekly piano lessons than for tuition at even the shabbiest of private schools. If you want a real test of vouchers (which I'd like to see), you have to shell out more money for it. But Bush's chit is even chintzier than I thought. It provides only an average of $750 in Title 1 money for every child left behind..."

1
OT13-01 Sound science  Bush

Repeatedly stated his commitment to policy based on "sound science"

Tim Noah (MSN/Slate):
"...As a matter of policy, Bush told The Associated Press last Nov. 14: I'd make it a goal to make sure that local folks got to make the decision as to whether or not they said creationism has been a part of our history and whether or not people ought to be exposed to different theories as to how the world was formed....Bush was responding to the Kansas Board of Education's decree last year that each of the state's school districts teach creationism alongside evolution...
In an essay last year in Time, the Harvard paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould put it this way:
Evolution is as well documented as any phenomenon in science, as strongly as the earth's revolution around the sun rather than vice versa. In this sense, we can call evolution a "fact." (Science does not deal in certainty, so "fact" can only mean a proposition affirmed to such a high degree that it would be perverse to withhold one's provisional assent.)
Dubya's answer to Gould would seem to be that science, unlike morality, is a cafeteria of personal choices. What Chatterbox doesn't understand is how a presidential candidate can argue this position and still be taken seriously as an education reformer..."

1
OT14-01 Halliburton and Iraq Cheney

"...During...[the] presidential campaign, Richard B. Cheney acknowledged that the oil-field supply corporation he headed, Halliburton Co., did business with Libya and Iran through foreign subsidiaries. But he insisted that he had imposed a "firm policy" against trading with Iraq. "Iraq's different," he said..."

Colum Lynch (Washington Post) via Truthout:
"...
According to oil industry executives and confidential United Nations records, however, Halliburton held stakes in two firms that signed contracts to sell more than $73 million in oil production equipment and spare parts to Iraq while Cheney was chairman and chief executive officer of the Dallas-based company.
Two former senior executives of the Halliburton subsidiaries say that, as far as they knew, there was no policy against doing business with Iraq. One of the executives also says that although he never spoke directly to Cheney about the Iraqi contracts, he is certain Cheney knew about them...
...in 1998, Cheney oversaw Halliburton's acquisition of Dresser Industries Inc., which exported equipment to Iraq through two subsidiaries of a joint venture with another large U.S. equipment maker, Ingersoll-Rand Co.
The subsidiaries, Dresser-Rand and Ingersoll Dresser Pump Co., sold water and sewage treatment pumps, spare parts for oil facilities and pipeline equipment to Baghdad through French affiliates from the first half of 1997 to the summer of 2000, U.N. records show. Ingersoll Dresser Pump also signed contracts -- later blocked by the United States -- to help repair an Iraqi oil terminal that U.S.-led military forces destroyed in the Gulf War.
Former executives at the subsidiaries said they had never heard objections -- from Cheney or any other Halliburton official -- to trading with Baghdad.
"Halliburton and Ingersoll-Rand, as far as I know, had no official policy about that, other than we would be in compliance with applicable U.S. and international laws," said Cleive Dumas, who oversaw Ingersoll Dresser Pump's business in the Middle East, including Iraq.
Halliburton's primary concern, added Ingersoll-Rand's former chairman, James E. Perrella, "was that if we did business with [the Iraqi regime], that it be allowed by the United States government. If it wasn't allowed, we wouldn't do it."..."
1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


1. Now some of you might wonder where this University is located - so, it is appropriate to make it clear right here that this is not a real University - it is only a hypothetical institute of lower higher learning.

2. I sometimes prefer to truncate the words Compassionate Conservative to Compassion Con. There is no intent here to imply anything significant by this (at least anything more than is commonly understood). I reserve all moral clarity rights to the use of this term. One Compassion Con credit is assigned to every instance of compassion (i.e., misleading, deceptive or inaccurate statement or outright lie/mendacity).

3. Note that Compassionate statements made by Mr. Bush's spokespersons, advisers or appointees - speaking clearly on behalf of Mr. Bush - are considered as being supported by Mr. Bush, absent a public statement to the contrary.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hit Counter