|
UNIVERSITY OF COMPASSIONATE
CONSERVATISM (what
is this?)
You have selected
COMPASSIONATE
CONSERVATISM
201 B*
*President Bush's lies
and deception moral clarity,
honesty and integrity
during
Elections 2000 - Part II
In this course you will learn about the
abundant lies, deception or
intent to deceive moral clarity, honesty and integrity displayed by President
George W. Bush (at that time the compassionate conservative2
Gov. Bush from the state of
Texas) - during Elections 2000 (Part II). This
part covers his statements on Al Gore, on his own
character/beliefs/track record, on the Florida recount and Other issues.
Make sure you drop by again when the Election 04 (2004) campaign starts
picking up steam, so that you can refresh your memory on his
compassion. Please
note that the statements made by Bush or his
spokespersons/administration3 - as
cited in column 3 of the tables below - are by default extracted from
one or more of the links shown in column 4. If the source of the
statements is different from the link(s) in column 4, then a URL is
explicitly provided in column 3. For feedback and corrections, please go
here. A detailed
acknowledgement of the sites from which the information below was
obtained is listed at
this location. In particular, I would like to acknowledge the
following sites where I got the vast majority of links from: PK
archive, Atrios/Eschaton,
Politics, Law and
Autism, Calpundit,
Buzzflash, Daily
Howler, Thinking
it Through, Bushwatch,
Spinsanity, Altercation.
Total Compassion Con credits 2
available from this course to date = 105
Last
Update: 10/28/2003
Please select one of these sections
Once you are done with the above
sections, you may choose another course by picking one of the options
below
AL GORE <go back to the top>
Compassion Con credits total = 33
| # |
Topic |
Gov.
Bush or his team's
Compassionate statement |
Some Uncompassionate Facts |
Compassion
Con Credits |
| AG1-01 |
Al Gore and gun
policy |
Bush
"...On May 3, Texas Gov. George
W. Bush alleged that Vice President Al
Gore was once a member of the National Rifle Association..."
|
Jake
Tapper (Salon):
"...The Gore camp said it could find no evidence that
Bush's claim was true, and NRA spokesman Bill Powers said that
he, too, could find no record of Gore's membership in the
organization's microfiche, but the next day Bush repeated the
charge. Pressed by reporters as to how he could make such a
claim, Bush said, "He might have been a member, let's put
it that way."..."
|
1 |
| AG1-02 |
Al Gore and gun
policy |
Bush
"...I disagree with the vice president on
this issue. I don't -- he's for registration of guns I think the
only people who are going to show up to register or get a
license -- I guess licensing, like a driver's license with a gun
-- the only people who are going to show up are law-abiding
citizens..."
|
PBS
Debate Transcript:
"...VICE PRESIDENT GORE: Well, I'm
not for registration. I am for licensing by states of new
handgun purchases.
MR. LEHRER: What does that -- what's that mean?
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: Sort of a license ID, like a driver's
license, for new handguns. And, you know, the Los Angeles --
MR. LEHRER: Excuse me, you would have to get the license -- a
photo ID to go in and -- before you could buy the gun?
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: Correct.
MR. LEHRER: All right. And who would issue --
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: The state..."
Jerry
Politex (Bushwatch/TomPaine):
"...Fact: "Gore actually favors licensing for
new handgun purchasers but nothing as vast as registering all
guns." Salon, 10/12/00..."
|
1 |
| AG2-01 |
Al Gore and the
internet |
Bush
"...In the first debate, after Gore
pointed out some of the differences between the two candidates'
positions on Medicare, Bush replied, "I'm beginning to
think this man not only invented the Internet, he invented the
calculator."..."
|
The statement that
Al Gore (claimed to have) "invented the internet" is
blatantly false.
See eRiposte
Al Gore media bias page for relevant links.
|
1 |
| AG3-01 |
Al Gore and Willie
Horton
|
Bush (campaign)
"...said last week that the campaign
studied Gore's 1988 presidential bid and closely tracked this
year's Democratic primary fight...Gore, they argue, was the
first candidate to raise the specter of Willie Horton in the
1988 primary..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...As [Ceci] Connolly knows well-as
she has reported in the past-Gore never mentioned Horton's name
in the 1988 primaries. In one debate (out of 42 total), he
criticized the Massachusetts furlough program which had given
Horton a weekend pass. But he never mentioned anyone's name;
never mentioned anyone's race; never ran an ad on the subject;
and never used any photos at all. The claim that Gore engaged in
"slash-and-burn politics against fellow Democrats" by
"raising the specter of Willie Horton" seems
impossible to square with the facts. But these facts are never
mentioned in this article-an article in which Gore is repeatedly
accused by Bush and Bush officials of being
"integrity-challenged," "negative," "a
man who feels like he can say what he wants," and someone
who feels "free and comfortable about saying things that
simply aren't true." "Voters are tired of
slash-and-burn politics," Bush's advisers are quoted saying
in a large presentation above the article's headline. But in the
midst of these accusations and pious claims, Bush's team makes a
serious and baldly false claim about Gore. And Connolly-though
she knows the facts-never challenges or corrects their
assertions, or places them in a full context.
Does Connolly know the facts in question? She has
explained them in the Post in the past. Here is her account of
this matter in a January 24 article:
But one week later, Bradley was digging up
a 15-year-old vote Gore cast on tobacco while in Congress. He
then revived the debate over Gore's role in raising the prison
furlough of murderer Willie Horton against Michael Dukakis in
the 1988 presidential campaign. Although
Gore was in fact the first to tar Dukakis with that criticism,
Gore studiously avoided mentioning Horton's name or race...." |
1 |
| AG4-01 |
Al Gore and
mother-in-law's prescription drug costs
|
Bush ad
"...Remember when Al Gore said his
mother-in-law's prescription cost more than his dog's? His own
aides said the story was made up..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...The ad shows a 9/19 Washington
Times article. Headline: "Aides concede Gore made up
medicine story." But we've found someone else who makes
lots of things up—the Washington Times often makes up good
stories. Here is the actual part of the Times story where the
"Gore aides" make their "concession:"
BOYER AND SCULLY: In fact,
Gore aides yesterday could not say whether the candidate's
mother-in-law pays for the arthritis medication Lodine out of
her own pocket or if the cost is covered by insurance.
Does that sound like the aides "said
the story was made up?" The aides said they didn't know how
Gore's mom-in-law pays for the drugs. But Gore had never said
anything about that. He said (correctly) that his mother-in-law
and his dog both use the drug, and that the drug costs more for
humans than for pets. Here's the actual quote which appeared in
the press—the only quote which appeared in the press.
Gore: "While it costs $108 a month for a person, it costs
$37.80 for a dog." Those were figures from a congressional
study, which Gore used to sketch out the problem. For the
record: Boyer and Scully said Gore was correct about the
general problem. They wrote, "Gore's basic premise is
correct—prescription drugs in general do cost more for humans
than for pets." Sorry, folks.
"Gore aides" never said that "the story was made
up."..." |
1 |
| AG4-02 |
Al Gore and
Bush's Prescription drug plan
|
Bush
"...[Gore] talks
about numbers. I’m beginning to think, not only did he invent
the Internet, but he invented the calculator. (LAUGHTER).
It’s fuzzy math. It’s to scare them, trying
to scare people in the voting booth..."
Bush
"...GORE (to Bush):
95% of all seniors would get no help whatsoever, under my
opponent’s plan, for the first 4 or 5 years. Why is it that
the wealthiest 1% get their tax cuts the first year, but 95% of
seniors have to wait 4 to 5 years before they get a single
penny?
BUSH: I guess my answer to that is, the man’s running on
Mediscare, trying to frighten people in the voting booth.
That’s just not the way I think, and I that’s just not my
intentions. That’s not my plan..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...Earlier—in his second statement of the entire
night—Bush had accused Gore of using "phony
numbers," and he maintained that critique throughout the
debate, not excluding this ten-minute segment...In fact, the
discussion of prescription drugs was one of the great battles
royales in TV debate history...Bush was dramatically,
crazily wrong about his own prescription drug plan (by
all accounts, one of the issues in which voters were taking the
most interest). Repeatedly, Bush misstated his own plan,
attacking Gore’s character in the process. Gore said that
seniors earning more than 25 grand would get no help from
Bush’s plan for four or five years; Bush insisted that all
senior citizens, not just the poor, got "instant help"
under his plan. About this, Bush was clearly wrong, as that
visit to his web site would have shown. But Bush accused Gore of
"fuzzy math" when he correctly described the Bush
plan; he said that Gore was "running on MediScare, trying
to frighten people in the voting booth."...Brooks
Jackson, Inside Politics, next day:
JACKSON: Gore said
Bush’s prescription drug plan would at first give not one
penny to a couple make $25,000 a year. And this time, Bush
bruised the truth when he denied it.
BUSH (on videotape): Under my plan, the man gets
immediate help with prescription drugs.
JACKSON: Wrong, unless the man spends $6,000 a year on
prescriptions..." |
2
(1 for calling Gore a liar, and 1 for lying
compassion about his own plan) |
| AG4-03 |
Gore's prescription drugs plan |
Bush
"...the Gore
Plan Provides: No choices,
insufficient coverage. Al Gore
says he’ll fight for the people against HMOs, but his
prescription drug proposal forces seniors to join HMOs selected
for them by Washington..."
|
Jonathan
Chait (The New Republic):
"...Or consider prescription-drug coverage, Gore's
signature issue. Bush never showed much interest in the topic
until his recent free fall, when polls suggested Gore was
killing him on it. So rapidly did Bush embrace the issue that he
launched the advertisements touting his prescription-drug plan a
full week before he unveiled the plan itself. And, again,
offering a competing plan was not sufficient--Bush mimicked
Gore's arguments as well. The main differences between the
candidates' proposals are that Gore would spend more money to
insure more seniors and offer drug coverage through the Medicare
program itself, while Bush would spend less and rely more
heavily on HMOs for coverage. But that hasn't stopped Bush from
accusing Gore of "insufficient coverage." Nor has it
kept him from imitating the vice president's broadsides against
managed care by claiming, perversely, that Gore would
"force seniors into a government-run HMO."..."
|
2 |
| AG5-01 |
Al Gore and Bush's
tax cut proposal |
Bush
"...accused Vice President Al Gore of
using “fuzzy math” when Gore pointed out that Bush’s plan
would spend more of the surplus on tax cuts for the wealthiest 1
percent of taxpayers than on education, health, prescription
drugs and the national defense combined..."
"...Bush, citing figures his staff said
were from a review of his plan by Congress’ Joint Committee on
Taxation, said that $223 billion of the total would go to
these affluent taxpayers not the some $561 billion the Gore
campaign has suggested..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...For the record, there was one journalist who spoke in
real time, discussing Bush’s post-debate lying. Her piece
appeared on October 17, 2000. The sub-headline? “Bush seems to
be having trouble with math lately.”...[she wrote]
The next day on “Good Morning
America,” Bush admitted that Gore’s math wasn’t fuzzy
after all. Later that day on CNN, he changed his story again...
Bush’s attack on the vice president’s mathematical
calculations has a dual irony. First, Bush was using fuzzy math
himself…While Bush accused his opponent of using “fuzzy
math,” the Republican candidate’s own statistics were
partisan-created rhetoric rather than substantiated facts...
Gore was correct in his statement about Bush’s budget figures.
In Bush’s plan, the tax cut for the top 1 percent of Americans
($620 billion) is greater than total domestic spending on
education ($47.6 billion), health ($131.9 billion), prescription
drugs ($158 billion), and national defense ($45 billion)
combined.
Bush’s questionable calculations were made apparent again
during the second presidential debate last Wednesday. Again,
Bush defended his tax plan, saying that the top 1 percent would
receive only $223 billion. Likewise, the Bush campaign cites
that only 21 percent of the tax cut goes to the wealthiest 1
percent of Americans. But this 21 percent and associated $223
billion numbers do not include the repeal of the estate tax…
Ignoring these facts, Bush argued that his tax cut for the
wealthy was far less than his actual policies and plans
demonstrate.
...Who wrote this October 17 critique? Why, it
was Melanie Ho, a UCLA senior, writing in the Daily Bruin.
While mainstream “journalists” cowered and quaked—and told
the world what a liar Gore was—a college student was
somehow able to note the “irony” in what Bush was doing.
We’ve often asked if high school students could get away with
work like the press corps’. In the fall of 2000, only Melanie
Ho—a college student—had the courage to get this tale
right. Who created the Culture of Lying? Manifestly, your
“press corps” did..."
Daily
Howler:
"...Consummate clowning would be involved in the effort to
shoot down Gore’s statement. But it all began with a blunder
by Bush. The morning after that first debate, Bush appeared on Good
Morning America. Asked about Gore’s “one percent”
claim, Bush seemed to say that the claim had been accurate.
Charles Gibson had to ask his question two times. But the second
time, he got Bush to answer:
GIBSON (10/4/00): You said all of that.
But is he incorrect in saying that you would give to the top one
percent of income earners in this country in tax relief more
than you would spend on health care, prescription drugs,
education, and national defense combined?
BUSH: No. That’s what I just said. I think what people have
got to understand is, wealthy people pay a lot of taxes today.
And if everyone gets tax relief, wealthy people are going to get
tax relief.
To all appearances, Bush had said that
Gore’s claim was factually accurate. Clearly, that’s what GMA
thought he had said. “We heard Governor Bush just say that
Vice President Gore was right on the amount that he’d be
spending for the richest Americans,” Diane Sawyer said, a few
moments later. Within hours, though, that
had changed. By the afternoon of October 4, Candidate Bush was
trashing Gore hard, saying that his claims were invented. In an
interview with the Baltimore Sun’s Karen Hosler, he basically
called Gore a liar:
HOSLER: [Bush] spoke disparagingly of
figures Gore gave regarding Medicare. “I don’t know where he
drug up those numbers,” said Bush in his Texas twang,
“probably the same place he drug up the numbers on rich
people—he made it up.”..." |
2
(1 for calling Gore a liar, and 1 for lying
compassion about his own plan) |
| AG5-02 |
Al Gore and Bush's
tax cut proposal |
Bush
"...Larry Lindsey, Bush's chief economic
adviser, proclaimed, "The Joint Committee on Taxation
proves that Vice President Gore was badly mistaken, inaccurately
portraying Governor Bush's plan as costing sixty percent more
than it actually does."..."
Bush
"...I can’t let the man continue with
fuzzy math. It’s $1.3 trillion, Mr. Vice President. And it’s
going to go to everybody who pays taxes. I’m not going to be a
pick-and-chooser. What is fair is everybody who pays taxes ought
to get relief..."
|
The
New Republic:
"...Bush staffers
have been claiming it would cost just $1.3 trillion over ten
years--which, combined with some optimistic assumptions about
spending, would keep Bush's budgets from dipping into the red.
The problem is that independent analyses show that Bush's tax
cut would cost far more than $1.3 trillion, and the Bush
campaign has refused to reveal how it came up with the number.
This week, though, the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation
released an analysis of Bush's plan that showed it would indeed
cost only $1.3 trillion. The Bushies immediately announced their
vindication. Larry Lindsey, Bush's chief economic adviser,
proclaimed, "The Joint Committee on Taxation proves that
Vice President Gore was badly mistaken, inaccurately portraying
Governor Bush's plan as costing sixty percent more than it
actually does." Press accounts dutifully reported the
counterclaims in the scrupulously evenhanded style of daily
journalism.
But what the Bush staff did not mention--and none of the
reporters realized--is that the JCT data that the Texas governor
is touting do not cover the ten-year cost of Bush's tax cut--it
covers only the first nine years [CG emphasis]. The Bush campaign has been
shockingly dishonest about this. Its press release touts the
figure as accounting for the "Current `Ten Year' Budget
Period"; the quotes around the phrase "Ten Year"
apparently signify that the budget period in question is
actually nine years. "Ten Year" is perhaps meant as
some sort of figure of speech. Perhaps Bush should rethink his
plans to make honesty the central issue of the campaign..." |
2
(1 for calling Gore a liar, and 1 for lying
compassion about his own plan) |
| AG6-01 |
Al Gore and
investment of social security funds in stocks |
Bush
"...Now all of a sudden [Gore's] decided it's
okay to be managing money in the stock market. First the stock
market was roulette and risky, and now the heat's on, and he
changes position..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...But how much were pundits willing
to spin you? They were willing to spin you a lot. According to
Kelly, Gore's "big tax cuts" were "sudden"
and his retirement plan was "abrupt;" Gore had
reinvented himself out of nowhere. The great god Spin roared
with pride. But had the Gore cuts really come out of nowhere?
Ron Brownstein, in the Los Angeles Times, had recently mentioned
some facts:
BROWNSTEIN: In January, the Office of Management and Budget
estimated the operating budget surplus—that is, funds in
federal accounts excluding Social Security—would total $746
billion through 2010. But revenue growth linked to the booming
economy has been running so strong that OMB is expected to
estimate the on-budget surplus will be as much as $1 trillion
larger over that period.
In other words, as everyone (including
Kelly) well knows, the projected federal budget surplus will
soon officially double. And, as everyone (including Kelly)
knows, it is in that context that Gore "suddenly"
offered an increase in his proposed tax cuts. Strangely, Kelly
never mentions the impending change in surplus projections as he
trashes Gore for "suddenly" changing. But luckily,
Brownstein isn't a spinner. He described the way the new
projections were changing both parties' plans:
BROWNSTEIN: The new money has encouraged a
similar pattern of convergence and contrast [between Bush and
Gore] on Social Security. Last summer, when he prepared his
budget blueprint, Gore was forced to eliminate Clinton's
proposal for federally subsidized accounts that would help
middle-income worker save for retirement. Gore had to abandon
the proposal because he needed the money to fund his education
and health care ideas...But the surplus projections have grown
so large that Gore today, without retrenching any of his other
spending plans, is scheduled to unveil a variation on Clinton's
retirement account plan.
How hard is this to figure out? Previously, Gore couldn't
afford the retirement accounts. With the new budget projections,
they are affordable..." |
1 |
| AG6-02 |
Al Gore's social
security plan |
Bush
"...responded by charging that Mr. Gore's
Social Security plan will add no less than $40 trillion to the
national debt..."
|
Paul
Krugman (New York Times):
"...That seems like an awfully big
number. It turns out to be an estimate of the total value of
payments from the general government budget to Social Security,
including interest, that will take place over the next 50 years.
And I could bore you by explaining why that number is
meaningless. The really amazing thing,
however, is that the number has nothing to do with Mr. Gore.
It's true that Social Security will need transfers from general
revenue if Mr. Gore's plan is put into effect. But it will need
just as much money if Mr. Gore's plan isn't put into effect. The
only way to reduce the required aid would be to reduce the
benefits promised to retirees...Maybe blaming Mr. Gore for
future mortality wouldn't have worked; but Mr. Bush's advisers
seem to think that blaming him for the entire future liabilities
of the Social Security system will, or at least can serve
temporarily to confuse voters who might otherwise have started
to think too clearly about the subject. Only two weeks to go
until the election, and we can clean up the mess later,
right?..."
Also see: Sam
Parry (Consortium News)
|
1 |
| AG6-03 |
Al Gore and social
security |
Bush
"...Promoting
his own plan to allow workers to invest some of their Social
Security money in stocks and bonds, Bush said Gore "doesn't
think people are up to the task of managing their own
money." "This is analog thinking in a digital age, 28K
thinking in a broadband era, and eight-track ideology in an MP3
world," Bush asserted, drawing hearty applause and
laughter. "And our nation must move beyond it." Bush
has defended his plan to augment Social Security with
"personal retirement accounts" against Gore claims
that it would drain the underlying Social Security system by $1
trillion over ten years. "My opponent seems to be
deliberately missing a trillion dollars. Maybe if you've been in
Washington too long you lose your ability to count real
money," Bush said..."It is irresponsible for the
chairman of the Democratic Party and for Vice President Gore to
stoke the fears of seniors while ignoring the hopes of younger
workers," Bush said..."
|
Paul
Krugman (New York Times):
"...In context, it's pretty clear he meant that Mr. Gore is
an old-economy fuddy-duddy because he insists that you can't
spend the same money twice — that you can't divert Social
Security taxes into individual accounts for young workers and
use that same money to pay benefits to their parents. Well, it's
a new economy, but it's not that new. The rules of arithmetic
are the same, whether you use a slide rule or a supercomputer..."
Jonathan
Chait (The New Republic):
"...Bush acts as if this concept were new. It's not.
Indeed, the United States once had a retirement system in which
individuals made their own decisions and managed their own
money. This system would best be described as
"nothing." It's what we had before 1935, and it didn't
work terribly well: people who didn't earn lavish incomes over
the course of their working lives often ended up in poverty, as
did those who gambled on risky investments and lost. That's why
FDR's administration created Social Security: to make sure every
worker got a pension sufficient to pay for basic necessities
like food and shelter...
Bush, cleverly, has turned this into a moral argument. "Al
Gore, who calls these bipartisan proposals risky, has a
substantial amount of his money invested in the stock
market," he claims (erroneously). "Why does he object
to young Americans doing the same?" Of course Gore does not
object to young Americans, or anybody else, having money in the
stock market; he objects to cutting a guaranteed benefit in
order for them to do so..." |
2
(1 for lying compassion about
his plan 1 for lying compassion about Gore) |
| AG6-04 |
Clinton/Gore on
social security and Medicare |
Bush
said "...that the Clinton administration
did nothing "to strengthen Social Security and repair
Medicare,"..."
|
Richard
Cohen (Washington Post):
"...He lies when he says that the Clinton administration
did nothing "to strengthen Social Security and repair
Medicare," when a fair reading of the administration's
record suggests it did...."
|
1 |
| AG7-01 |
Al Gore's
overall spending plan |
Bush
"...charged that Gore’s spending
proposals are three times what Clinton proposed in 1992...said
Gore’s spending proposals are greater than the combination of
what Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis proposed in 1984 and
1988, respectively...
[claimed] Gore’s total spending
[proposal was]...$127 billion..."
|
Issues
2000:
"...Bush charged that Gore’s
spending proposals are three times what Clinton proposed in
1992. But back then, federal spending was constrained by the
federal deficit, which has been wiped out during Clinton’s
terms.
While Bush is correct that Gore’s spending proposals exceed
his, the combination of Bush’s spending plans and tax cuts
would eat up more of the surplus than Gore would with his more
modest tax cut and his larger spending plans.
To further complicate matters, Bush said Gore’s spending
proposals are greater than the combination of what Walter
Mondale and Michael Dukakis proposed in 1984 and 1988,
respectively. However, it appears Bush arrived at the number by
using inflation-adjusted spending proposals and comparing them
with estimates of Gore’s spending plans prepared by partisan
groups such as the Republican staff of the Senate Budget
Commitee. Gore’s total spending, according to the campaign,
would be about $88 billion a year, not the $127 billion the Bush
camp contends.
Source: Boston Globe analysis of St. Louis debate Oct 18,
2000..."
|
3 |
| AG7-02 |
Al Gore's
overall spending plan |
Bush
"...Under Gore’s plan, we’re talking
about. adding 20,000 new bureaucrats..."
|
Issues
2000:
"...ANALYSIS: Bush is basing his claims on a partisan
report by the Republican members of the Senate Budget Committee.
To get their numbers, they applied today’s ratio of employees
to expenditures to their own estimates of Gore’s budget. The
assumption-that more spending means more employees-DOESN“T
NECESSARILY FOLLOW. In fact, during the 1990s, spending went up
(by 38%) while the federal work force went down (by 12%).
Source: Presidential Debate, Boston Globe, “Number Crunch”,
p. A15 Oct 11, 2000..."
|
1 |
| AG7-03 |
Al Gore's
overall spending plan |
Bush
"...The Senate Budget Committee did a
study of Gore’s expenditures: it could conceivably bust the
budget by $900 billion..."
|
Issues
2000:
"...GORE: What he’s quoting is not the Senate Budget
Committee, it is a partisan press release by the Republicans..."
[CG note: it appears it was the GOP members of the Budget
committee - so it was a partisan release]
|
1 |
| AG7-04 |
Al Gore's
overall spending plan |
Bush
"...Bush said Gore was a big spender
whose proposals would bust the budget. And he said electing Gore
would mean the return of big government..."
|
Issues
2000:
"...Bush’s budget has less of a
buffer than Gore’s does. Bush’s budget would use all but
$265 billion of the surplus, and that is without paying for some
of his campaign promises, like missile defense. Gore says he
would set aside $660 billion of the surplus for a reserve fund.
Gore said he had helped slim down the federal bureaucracy
through his work on the administration’s Reinventing
Government initiative. Since 1992, the civilian government work
force has fallen by 400,000 people, to 1.82 million, although
nearly three-quarters of the reduction has been the Pentagon.
Some analysts measure the size of government by looking at total
spending relative to the size of the economy. By that measure,
outlays have declined steadily in recent years, to 18.7% of
gross domestic product this year. Gore said his plan
would push that figure down to 17% by 2008. Source: NY Times
analysis of St. Louis debate Oct 19, 2000..."
|
1 |
| AG8-01 |
Al Gore and Campaign spending |
Bush
"...in the first
presidential debate, the Republican claimed that the Gore
campaign had out-spent his. “This man has out-spent me,”
Bush said..."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...In fact,
Bush has raised and spent more than twice as much money in this
election as Gore has raised and spent.
There has been no explanation from the Bush campaign about this
remarkable claim and the national news media have not pressed
for one, as the media certainly would have if Gore had made a
similarly false statement.
.."
Daily
Howler (1999):
"...According to Ceci Connolly’s Post Magazine
cover story (4/4), the Gore campaign hopes to spend $47 million
during the upcoming primaries. This would include up to $16
million in federal matching funds--meaning the campaign itself
would have to raise $31 million from individual contributors...
CONNOLLY:
[W]hile the vice president’s game plan this year is
virtually the same as Lamar Alexander’s or Elizabeth Dole’s
or George W. Bush’s, his fund-raising machine is bigger,
tougher, faster.
But it’s hard to
know how to reconcile that with the fund-raising goals we have
stated. When Gore is raising $31 million to Bush’s $50
million, how is the Gore “machine” “bigger?” Indeed,
Connolly acknowledges the Bush camp’s plan later on in her
article:
CONNOLLY: In recent campaigns, wealthy contestants like Ross
Perot and Steve Forbes have tossed out the rule book and the
matching funds that come with it and spent their own millions
with no restrictions. And this year, Texas Gov. George W. Bush,
fearing Forbes will again use his wealth to carpet-bomb fellow
Republicans, is considering forgoing matching funds in order to
bust the spending limits in the early primaries..."
Also see: Daily
Howler
|
1 |
| AG9-01 |
Al Gore and the
environment |
Bush
"...''I think the vice president is
probably going to have to explain what he meant by some of the
things in his book, to share with us the philosophy behind some
of the standards in the book.''..."
|
USA
Today:
"...Later, Bush acknowledged he has not read ''Earth in the
Balance.''..."
|
1 |
| AG9-02 |
Clinton/Gore on National forest
protection |
Bush
"...said the
Clinton-Gore administration “took 40 million acres of land out
of circulation without consulting local officials. … I just
cited an example of the administration just unilaterally acting
without any input.”
..."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...Bush was referring to a pending administration proposal
to protect 40 million acres of roadless areas in national
forests from more road building and logging. As the Sierra Club
noted in a press release, Bush’s statement was false.
“In
fact, the Forest Service conducted 600 public meetings about the
proposal nationwide and more than one million Americans urged
the administration to strengthen the proposal,” the Sierra
Club said. “There was ample opportunity for local officials
and others to comment on the proposal.”
..."
|
1 |
| AG9-03 |
Clinton/Gore on ANWR
drilling |
Bush
"...I just found out the other day an
interesting fact, that there's a national petroleum reserve
right next to Prudhoe Bay that your administration had opened up
for exploration in that pristine area..."
|
Sierra
Club:
"...MISLEADING: The National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska
was set aside specifically for potential oil and gas production.
Last year, the Administration opened a portion of the NPR-A to
leasing and development, being careful to prohibit drilling in
environmentally sensitive areas, such as the Colville River
Delta and Teshekpuk Lake. The NPR-A lies far to the west of the
Arctic National Widllife Refuge and is separated from the
coastal plain by the Prudhoe Bay oil fields. Bush would like to
open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling even
though it contains many sensitive areas with unmatched
ecological diversity. The coastal plain of the Arctic Refuge is
home to polar bears, caribou, musk oxen and other rare species..."
|
1 |
| AG10-01 |
Clinton/Gore Army divisions
ill-prepared for combat |
Bush
said "...that two of the Army's 10 active
divisions are so ill-prepared for combat that, if called, they
would have to report, "Not ready for duty, sir."..."
|
Richard
Cohen (Washington Post):
"...The Army says Bush is flat-out wrong...."
Issues2000:
"...Bush had said: “If called on by the
commander-in-chief today, two entire divisions of the Army would
have to report ‘Not ready for duty, sir.’” But Maj. Thomas
Collins, an Army spokesman, told CNN: “All 10 Army divisions
are combat-ready, fully able to meet their war-fighting
mission.”..."
|
1 |
| AG10-02 |
Clinton/Gore Military spending |
Bush
said "Not since the years before Pearl
Harbor has our investment in national defense been so low as a
percentage"
|
Paul
Krugman (New York Times):
"...Strangely, if you looked at the numbers put out by his
economic team, you found that he actually proposed to reduce
that percentage further, spending substantially less on defense
than his opponent..."
POST-SCRIPT (2001)
"...Last week, according to newspaper reports, Mr. Bush
told lawmakers that there would be "no new money this year
for defense." Karen Hughes, a counselor to Mr. Bush,
conceded that "we may in fact need resources" for the
military — may? after all that martial rhetoric? — but made
it clear that there was no rush. One officer bitterly declared,
"It sounds like campaign promise No. 1 being
broken."..."
(Note that increased defense spending was proposed
by the administration only after its 2001 tax cut passed)
|
1 |
| AG11-01 |
Clinton/Gore on
children |
Bush
claiming "...Clinton and Al Gore
"have done nothing to help children"..."
|
Richard
Cohen (Washington Post):
"...His team--now I am including Dick Cheney--lies when it
says Clinton and Al Gore "have done nothing to help
children" when children, it can be fairly said, have been
an obsession of this administration. Among other things, the
Clinton administration doubled the funding of Head Start. Bush
himself now professes love for this program, which Cheney, while
he was in the House, voted to abolish....."
|
1 |
| AG12-01 |
Clinton/Gore on tax
cuts |
Bush
"...You were promised a middle class tax
cut in 1992. It didn't happen..." (suggesting Clinton/Gore
didn't keep a promise)
|
Jerry
Politex (Bushwatch):
"...Fact: "The administration negotiated a
budget bill with the Republican Congress in 1997 that included a
children's tax credit that reduced taxes for the middle
class." (E.J. Dionne, Jr., Houston Chronicle, 10/18/00) --Politex,
10/19/00..."
|
1 |
| AG13-01 |
Al Gore and EITC |
Bush
"...I felt during his debate with Senator
[Bill] Bradley saying he [Gore] authored the EITC [earned-income
tax credit] when it didn't happen..."
|
Jerry
Politex (Bushwatch/TomPaine):
"...Fact: "Actually, Gore had claimed to have
authored an "expansion of the earned-income tax
credit," which he did in 1991." Salon,
10/12/00..."
|
1 |
STATEMENTS
RELATING TO BUSH'S CHARACTER/BELIEFS <go back to the top>
Compassion Con credits total = 33
| # |
Topic |
Gov.
Bush or his team's
Compassionate statement |
Some Uncompassionate Facts |
Compassion
Con Credits |
| BS1-01 |
Being a moderate |
Bush
"..."Real Plans for Real
People."... "Compassionate conservatism"...
"Reformer With Results"..."
|
Jonathan
Chait (The New Republic):
"...Last Monday, George W. Bush
visited a retirement home to discuss Medicare and prescription
drugs. On Tuesday, his topic again was health care. On
Wednesday, he turned to the environment. On Thursday, it was
education and the achievement gap. The theme, his campaign
explained, was "Real Plans for Real People."
Or, put another way, "I'm a moderate"--which has been
the message behind practically every Bush slogan for the last
year. "Compassionate conservatism" meant "I'm
different from the Republican Congress." "Reformer
With Results" meant "I'm as different from the
Republican Congress as John McCain is." Bush's convention
refrain--"They have not led. We will"--meant
"I'll pursue the same goals as the Clinton-Gore
administration, only more effectively." "Real Plans
for Real People" means "My policies are as mainstream
as Al Gore's."
Given the political landscape--most voters support the
Democratic positions on major issues--Bush's message of
moderation is good strategy. It is also a lie. In the substance
of his program, Bush is running to the right of Bob Dole in 1996
and to the right of today's Republican Congress...His proposed
policies, if enacted, would alter government more dramatically
than anything in the last three generations. "We will look
back at the Bush years," predicts GOP activist Grover
Norquist, "as moving the country further and faster toward
individual liberty than the Reagan years." Conservative
columnists George Will and Lawrence Kudlow have independently
hailed Bush and Dick Cheney as the Republican Party's most
conservative ticket since Calvin Coolidge. Accordingly,
conservatives--the same cantankerous bunch that castigated
stalwarts like Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott as apostates--have
fallen behind Bush in lockstep...."
(read
more on the evidence Chait provides) |
1 |
| BS2-01 |
Drug use |
Bush
"...“Could I pass the challenge of a
background check? My answer is absolutely,” Bush said. “Not
only could I pass the background check and the standards applied
to today’s White House, but I could have passed the background
check and the standards applied on the most stringent conditions
when my dad was President -- 15-year period.”..."
|
Jake
Tapper (Salon):
"...Under a barrage of tenacious
media inquiries, as well as polling data indicating that the
American people find the question relevant, Bush finally decided
to abandon his refuse-
to-
answer-
questions strategy. In a testy exchange with a reporter on
August 18, he said that he would be able to pass the traditional
White House background check question as to whether he'd used
drugs in the past seven years.
But that answer only raised more questions than it answered, and
amid a hail of media criticism Bush felt impelled to issue yet
another clarification the next day, extending the time frame
when he could have passed the background check to include the
time when his father was president -- "a 15-year
period." Finally, a Bush spokesperson expanded the
definition yet again, stating that Bush was saying he had not
used illegal drugs at any time since he was 28, in 1974 -- the
year he graduated from Harvard Business School and moved back to
Texas.
(The Clinton White House background check, it should be noted,
asks prospective senior officials if they have ever used illegal
drugs since the age of 18. Bush refuses to answer that
question.)..."Bush has now created this whole narrative
which could be interpreted as Clintonian obfuscation," says
William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard.
"And that chips away at this picture we've been presented
with of Bush as the white knight leading Republicans back into
the White House."..."
Also see: Jake
Tapper (Salon)
|
1 |
| BS2-02 |
Drug use |
Bush
"...It's time for some politician to stand up and say,
"Enough is enough of this." The game of trying to
force me to prove a negative and to chase down unsubstantiated
ugly rumors has got to end..."
|
Daily
Howler:
"...Bush says he won't discuss what he may have done wrong,
because it may make young people think it's OK. But he has
widely discussed the fact that he drank heavily until he was
forty years old. To believe Bush didn't do drugs is to believe
the following: on principle, he won't discuss the thing he didn't
do, while discussing quite freely the thing that he did. We take
it as obvious that this makes no sense. But some in the press
pretend otherwise...
EVANS: The "Big
Question" for Gov. George W. Bush, Jr., of Texas. Governor,
there are and have been rumors—lots of them—of your possible
past use of hard drugs. Sir, is it not now in your interest to
tell us flatly that the rumors are or are not true?
GOV. BUSH: You know,
Rollie, when I first got started on this campaign I started
hearing about these ridiculous rumors. I made my mind up at that
time not to chase every single rumor that had been floated about
me...It's time for some politician to stand up and say,
"Enough is enough of this." The game of trying to
force me to prove a negative and to chase down unsubstantiated
ugly rumors has got to end.
...But, despite the artless questioning of the occasional host,
Bush is not being asked to "disprove a rumor." He is
being asked to answer a question, one which every
presidential candidate has been asked since the 1988 campaign.
The 1988 admissions by candidates Gore and Babbitt resulted from
The Question. In 1992, Candidate Clinton's famous statement that
he didn't inhale resulted from the same process. Every other
candidate in the present race has been asked the question which
Bush has been asked. No one asked them to prove their
case when they said that they didn't use drugs..."
|
2 |
| BS3-01 |
Use of focus groups/
polling |
Bush
"...said, “I
think you've got to look at how one has handled responsibility
in office, whether or not … you've got the capacity to
convince people to follow; whether or not one makes decisions
based upon sound principles; or whether or not you rely upon
polls and focus groups on how to decide what the course of
action is. We've got too much polling and focus groups going on
in Washington today. We need decisions made on sound
principles.”
..."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...Left out
was that Bush’s campaign has spent roughly $1 million on polls
and focus groups during this campaign, about equal to the Gore
campaign’s spending, according to a report by NBC News. [Oct.
6, 2000]. Indeed, Bush changed his campaign slogan from
“Compassionate Conservative” to “Real Plans for Real
People” because of poll analysis done by his campaign.
.."
Daily
Howler:
"...Weisman did introduce one new
idea—the idea that Bush has done the same things as Gore, but
just hasn't been ridiculed for it. Indeed, we were struck by
that very same thought when we read Terry Neal's piece in last
Friday's Washington Post. According to Neal, the GOP is
"planning a summer convention that minimizes attack
politics." Why has the party decided to play down attacks?
Here was one part of the background:
NEAL: Last month, the
Texas governor's campaign held focus group discussions and
concluded that Vice President Gore's biggest liability with
voters is his personality—particularly when he's in attack
mode. The information collected there as well as polling data
has persuaded the campaign to take the high road and deviate
from its original strategy, which Bush indicated in March would
include direct and frequent attacks on Gore.
Ohmigod! According to Neal, the Bush
campaign has used focus groups and polling data,
and changed the hopeful's approach! If you wanted to, you
could almost say that Bush had thus "reinvented
himself." Indeed, Neal also stated in his piece that Bush
will avoid certain issues at the convention:
NEAL: The campaign is
trying to focus the event narrowly on the issues Bush has
concentrated on since effectively wrapping up the nomination in
March: education, Social Security and Medicare, "compassion
subjects" (empowerment and revitalization), and national
defense...Notably absent from the agenda are tax cuts and
abortion.
Bush's tax cut was once "rolled
out" as a major part of his campaign...."
|
2 |
| BS4-01 |
White House guest sleepovers |
Bush
"...“I believe
they've moved that sign, ‘The buck stops here,’ from the
Oval Office desk to ‘The buck stops here’ on the Lincoln
bedroom, and that's not good for the country. It's not right. We
need to have a new look about how we conduct ourselves in
office,” Bush said.
.."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...What Bush
left out was that since he took office in 1995, he has had 203
guests stay over at the Governor’s Mansion in Austin, Texas.
More than half of them have contributed to his campaign,
amounting to $2.2 million. [The
Public I]..."
|
1 |
| BS5-01 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...In his 1999 autobiography A Charge
to Keep, Mr. Bush offers a lyrical description of his flight
training in the F-102 fighter. "I continued flying with my
unit for the next several years," he writes..."
"...His campaign biography states that
he flew with the unit until he won release
from the service in September 1973, nine months early, for
graduate school..."
|
Joe
Conason (New York Observer):
"...That simply isn’t true: Lieutenant Bush never flew
another jet after being suspended from flight duty in August
1972 for failing to take a mandated annual physical..."
Eric Alterman
(MSNBC/WLM
page 173):
"...But both claims are false.
Bush flew with the 111th for 22 months, until April 1972, and
never flew again..."
Note: Uggabugga's
table is good. Also see AWOLBush.
|
2 |
| BS5-02 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...Further along [in his 1999
autobiography] he says his military service "gave me
respect for the chain of command."..."
|
Joe
Conason (New York Observer):
"...Not enough respect, apparently, to report for duty as
ordered, since his records show that he ignored two direct
orders to do so..."
|
1 |
| BS5-03 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...claim that he vaulted ahead of the
Air Guard waiting list because he was willing to fly an
airplane, and there were openings..."
"They
were looking for pilots, and I was honored to serve.",
Governor Bush told the Dallas Morning News. [DMN9/08/99]..."
|
Democrats.com:
"...“But
Tom Hail, a historian for the Texas Air National Guard, said
that records do not show a pilot shortage in the Guard squadron
at the time. Hail, who reviewed the unit's personnel records for
a special Guard museum display on Gov. Bush's service, said
Bush's unit had 27 pilots at the time he began applying. While
that number was two short of its authorized strength, the unit
had two other pilots who were in training and another awaiting a
transfer. There was no apparent need to fast-track applicants,
he said.” [LAT 7/4/99]
“The Texas Air Guard had about 900 slots for pilots, air and
ground crew members, supervisors, technicians and support staff.
Sgt. Donald Dean Barnhart, who still serves in the Guard, said
that he kept a waiting list of about 150 applicants' names. He
said it took up to a year and a half for one name to move to the
top of the list. "Quite a few gentlemen were
wanting to get in," he recalled. For Bush, there
was no wait. He met with commander Staudt in his Houston office
and made his application--all before his graduation in June.”
[LAT, 7/4/99]
“Beckwith, Bush's spokesman, painted a different picture. He
said that the Guard needed pilots at the time and Bush was
available. "A lot of people weren't qualified" or
willing to fly, he said, so special commissions were offered to
those willing to undergo the extra training required.” [LAT
7/4/99]
“But Shoemake,
who also served as a chief of personnel in the Texas Guard from
1972 to 1980, remembers no pilot shortage. "We had so many
people coming in who were super-qualified," he said.”
[LAT 7/4/99]
“Records from his [Bush’s] military file show that in
January 1968, after inquiring about Guard admission, Mr. Bush
went to an Air Force recruiting office near Yale, where he took
and passed the test required by the Air Force for pilot
trainees. His score on the pilot aptitude section, one of five
on the test, was in the 25th percentile, the lowest allowed for
would-be fliers.” [7/4/99]..."
|
2 |
| BS5-04 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...Bush and his
campaign have said that he performed "alternative"
duty at the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron in Montgomery
from May to November 1972, while he was
working on a Senate race in Alabama..."
"...Bush has said
that he has “some recollection” of attending drills that
year, but has not been more specific..."
Bush campaign
(provided a) "...tattered
piece of attendance record (which lists no months, years, or
last name)...as evidence of attending Air National Guard
training..."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...Bush
has a one-year gap in his National Guard duty from 1972-1973
when he was supposed to have transferred from the Texas Air
National Guard to the Alabama Air National Guard. According
to the Boston Globe, “In his final 18 months of
military service in 1972 and 1973, Bush did not fly at all. And
… for a full year, there is no record that he showed up for
the periodic drills required of part-time guardsmen.” [Boston
Globe, May, 23, 2000]. Bush has said that he has “some recollection” of attending
drills that year, but has not been more specific. Under Air
National Guard rules at the time, anyone who did not report to
required drills could be inducted in the draft to serve in
Vietnam, according to the Globe. That never happened to
Bush.
The press has reported these gaps in Bush’s record, but has
not pressed the issue as a story worthy of determined pursuit or
pundit show commentary. Similarly, Bush’s implausible answers
have not led to questions from the media about Bush’s
veracity..."
Eric Alterman
(MSNBC/WLM
page 173):
"...But, the
Globe notes, Bush’s own records contradict that assertion. In
May 1972, Bush sought a permanent transfer to a postal unit in
Alabama that didn’t require weekend drills or active duty.
Guard headquarters overruled that decision. Bush did not do any
drills from May through September 1972. In September 1972, Bush
won approval to do temporary "alternative" training at
the 187th Squadron in Montgomery. He was cleared to attend
weekend drills in October and November. But two of the 187th’s
officers said Bush never appeared. One of them, retired Brig.
Gen. William Turnipseed, says he is "dead-certain he didn’t
show up." Bush, who refuses all interviews on the subject,
says he was there, but can’t remember anything he did. His
campaign can find no records to corroborate this..."
Also see Talion.com
for a copy of the report from May 1973 signed by his superiors
stating that Bush stopped flying after May 1972.
Talion.com:
"...The tattered piece of attendance record (which lists no
months, years, or last name) which the Bush campaign presented
as evidence of attending Air National Guard training is not even
from the Air National Guard. This incomplete scrap of paper is
from the Air Force Reserve punishment unit, not the Air National
Guard. (13)
Note the ARF (Air Reserve Force) listing at the top, rather than
the ANG designator, which would indicate it was from the Air
National Guard..."
Talion.com:
"...1. A September 29, 1972 Air National Guard confirming
orders “suspending
1st Lt. George W. Bush from flying status are
confirmed...Reason for Suspension: Failure to accomplish annual
medical exam.”...4. In Fall 1973, as an automatic disciplinary
action, Bush was reassigned to the Obligated Reserve Section in
Denver, because he disobeyed orders to show up for a mandatory
flight physical and therefore was unable to fulfill the last two
years of his six-year obligation as an Air National Guard jet
fighter pilot..."
Daily
Howler:
"...Andrew
Sullivan suggests that Paul Krugman
has glossed the facts of the “missing year” case. Sullivan
refers to a New York Times report of November 3, 2000. The
report directly referenced Robinson’s prior work; in it, Jo
Thomas judged that “some of [Robinson’s] concerns may be
unfounded. Documents reviewed by The Times showed that Mr. Bush
served in at least 9 of the 17 months in question.” Thomas’
short, 539-word piece was, in fact, quite sketchy. Even she
found a “seven-month gap” (April 1972 to November 1972) in
which Bush performed no service. In some ways, Thomas even
seemed a bit slick. For example, she quoted General Turnipseed
in such a way as to suggest that Bush had served in Alabama (see
Sullivan’s item today). But she failed to mention
Turnipseed’s repeated statements that Bush had not
served there..."
Also see this Daily
Howler series for a detailed examination of the above.
|
2 |
| BS5-05 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"I
can't remember what I did, but I wasn't flying because they
didn't have the same airplanes. I fulfilled my
obligations."
|
Democrats.com:
"...On
June 26th this report appeared in the Dallas
Morning News. “Campaigning Friday in Tuscaloosa, Ala., Bush
was asked about his 1972 service in that state. "I was
there on a temporary assignment and fulfilled my weekends at one
period of time," he said. "I made up some missed
weekends." "I can't remember what I did, but I wasn't
flying because they didn't have the same airplanes. I fulfilled
my obligations."
The
Truth
He was no longer
flying because he had been suspended in August of 1972 for
failure to “accomplish” a required medical exam. [Boston
Globe, 5/23/00] (Suspension document at http://www.cis.net/~coldfeet/grounded.gif)
Bush was suspended from flying on August 1, 1972, prior to his
request for the transfer to the187th at Montgomery Alabama,
September 5, 1972. Bush did not receive permission
until September 15, which was close to six weeks after his
suspension from flying.
Another
question is raised by the fact that he cannot remember what he
did for the Air National Guard in Alabama, despite the fact that
28 years later he still remembers the specifics of his work
there on the campaign of William Blount as cited in a July 22,
2000 New York Times article. “In an interview 28 years later,
Mr. Bush remembered the numbers. "We all teamed together
and helped Red get about 36 percent of the vote," he said
with a short laugh, "in spite of the fact that Nixon had
gotten 72 percent of the vote. The ticket-splitting was
phenomenal."”..."
|
1 |
| BS5-06 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...As for Mr. Bush’s curious failure
to take the annual physical in 1972, the only excuse he has
offered is that he was in Alabama working on a Republican Senate
campaign and couldn’t get back to Houston for a checkup by his
personal physician..."
|
Joe
Conason (New York Observer):
"...That, too, is blatantly untrue. For as Mr. Bush surely
knows—having undergone such examinations in previous
years—only a certified Air Force flight surgeon may conduct a
pilot physical..."
RealChange:
"...his story also changed on why he refused to take a
medical exam -- including a drug test - in 1972. (The refusal
ended Bush's flying career.) His staff first claimed that he
didn't take the physical because he was in Alabama and his
personal physician was in Houston. But flight physicals can be
administered only by certified Air Force flight surgeons, and
there were surgeons assigned at the time to Maxwell Air Force
Base in Montgomery, where Bush was living. His staff now admits
that that explanation was "wrong", without saying
where it came from or what the real reason was..."
|
1 |
| BS5-07 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...[claimed that] he tried to volunteer for service in Vietnam
"to relieve active-duty pilots."..."
|
Joe
Conason (New York Observer):
"...The twists and turns of Mr. Bush’s military record
are too complex for an exhaustive analysis in this space. Among
the questionable claims in his book is that he tried to
volunteer for service in Vietnam "to relieve active-duty
pilots." In a more candid mood in 1998, however, he told a
reporter for The Fort Worth Star-Telegram, "I
don’t want to play like I was somebody out there marching [to
war] when I wasn’t. It was either Canada or the service and I
was headed into the service."..."
RealChange:
"...He has stated on several occasions that he did not want
to be an infantryman, and acknowledges that he came to oppose
the war itself. He claims that he joined the guard to fly
planes, and would have been happy to go to Vietnam, but ignores
the obvious choice of the Air Force or the Navy -- which his
dad, a genuine war hero, joined. Furthermore, when he signed up
for the Guard, he checked a box saying "Do not volunteer
for overseas service." Later, he made a perfunctory
application to transfer to a program called "Palace
Alert", which dispatched F-102 pilots to Europe or the Far
East -- and just occasionally Vietnam -- for 3 or 6 month
assignments. But Bush was not nearly qualified, as he must have
known, and was immediately turned down, and the F-102 not used
overseas after June, 1970 in any case..."
|
1 |
| BS5-08 |
Air National Guard |
Bush
"...Bush has said no one to his knowledge helped him get into the
National Guard. “I asked to become a pilot,” Bush said. “I
met the qualifications, and ended up becoming an F-102 pilot,”
The Associated Press reported. Bush insisted that he knew
of no special treatment. [AP, July 5, 1999]
..."
|
Sam
Parry, Consortium News:
"...But the
record indicates that, despite having the lowest acceptable
score for entry, Bush jumped over other young men waiting to get
into the National Guard. Other accounts suggest that a “good
friend” of Bush’s father, George H.W. Bush, then a
congressman from Houston who supported the war, weighed in with
Ben Barnes, the Texas Speaker of the House, to arrange a slot
for George W. Bush. [The Guardian (U.K.), July 29, 1999]. Sometime in late 1967 or early 1968, Barnes “personally
asked the top official of the Texas Air National Guard to help
George W. Bush obtain a pilot's slot in a Guard fighter
squadron,” The Washington Post reported. [Sept. 21,
1999]. On Sept. 27, 1999, Barnes submitted a sworn statement
that he helped Bush by contacting Brig. Gen. James M. Rose..."
RealChange:
"...On May 27, 1968, George Bush Jr.
was 12 days away from losing his student draft deferment, at a
time when 350 Americans a week were dying in combat. The
National Guard, seen by many as the most respectable way to
avoid Vietnam, had a huge waiting list -- a year and a half in
Texas, over 100,000 men nationwide. Yet Bush and his family
friends pulled strings, and the young man was admitted the same
day he applied, regardless of any waiting list.
Bush's unit commander, Col. "Buck"
Staudt, was so excited about his VIP recruit that he staged a
special ceremony for the press so he could have his picture
taken administering the oath (even though the official oath had
been given by a captain earlier.)...Of
course, it later came out in court that a close Bush friend,
Simon Adger, had asked Barnes to get Bush Jr. into the Guard,
and that Barnes did so, via General Rose...
George Bush Jr. admits that he knew Adger socially at the time,
and further admits that he lobbied Col. "Buck" Staudt,
the commander of the VIP unit Bush joined. Staudt claims that
he, not General Rose (who he later replaced), was the one who
made the decision on admissions anyway. Bush Jr. admits that he
met Staudt in late 1967, during Christmas vacation of his senior
year, called him later, and -- in Bush's words -- "found
out what it took to apply." When
asked how Bush came to call Staudt, his spokeswoman Karen Hughes
said he "heard from friends while he was home over the
Christmas break that ... Colonel Staudt was the person to
contact." She says that Bush doesn't recall who those
"friends" were. But we know that Sid Adger was also a
friend of Staudt's, served with him on the Houston Chamber of
Commerce's Aviation Committee, and in 1967 held a luncheon
honoring Gen. Staudt and his unit for winning an Air Force
commendation. In fact, both of Adger's sons also joined General
Staudt's unit, in 1966 and 1968 respectively..."
|
|