Compassionate
Nominees
Moral Clarity
aka Honesty
A Promise Made is
A Promise Kept
Compassionate
Policy
Compassionate Media,
Uncompassionate Voices
Using Compassion
Con credits
About CG/
Acknowledgements
Search CG

UNIVERSITY OF COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM (what is this?) 

You have selected

COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM 201 B*
*President Bush's lies and deception moral clarity, honesty and integrity 
during Elections 2000 - Part II

In this course you will learn about the abundant lies, deception or intent to deceive moral clarity, honesty and integrity displayed by President George W. Bush (at that time the compassionate conservative2 Gov. Bush from the state of Texas) - during Elections 2000 (Part II). This part covers his statements on Al Gore, on his own character/beliefs/track record, on the Florida recount and Other issues. Make sure you drop by again when the Election 04 (2004) campaign starts picking up steam, so that you can refresh your memory on his compassion. 

Please note that the statements made by Bush or his spokespersons/administration3 - as cited in column 3 of the tables below - are by default extracted from one or more of the links shown in column 4. If the source of the statements is different from the link(s) in column 4, then a URL is explicitly provided in column 3. For feedback and corrections, please go here.

A detailed acknowledgement of the sites from which the information below was obtained is listed at this location. In particular, I would like to acknowledge the following sites where I got the vast majority of links from: PK archiveAtrios/Eschaton, Politics, Law and Autism, Calpundit, Buzzflash, Daily Howler, Thinking it Through, BushwatchSpinsanity, Altercation

Total Compassion Con credits 2 available from this course to date = 105

Last Update: 10/28/2003

 Please select one of these sections

Once you are done with the above sections, you may choose another course by picking one of the options below

 

AL GORE <go back to the top>

Compassion Con credits total = 33

# Topic Gov. Bush or his team's Compassionate statement Some Uncompassionate Facts Compassion Con Credits
AG1-01 Al Gore and gun policy Bush

"...On May 3, Texas Gov. George W. Bush alleged that Vice President Al Gore was once a member of the National Rifle Association..."

Jake Tapper (Salon):
"...The Gore camp said it could find no evidence that Bush's claim was true, and NRA spokesman Bill Powers said that he, too, could find no record of Gore's membership in the organization's microfiche, but the next day Bush repeated the charge. Pressed by reporters as to how he could make such a claim, Bush said, "He might have been a member, let's put it that way."..."
1
AG1-02 Al Gore and gun policy Bush

"...I disagree with the vice president on this issue. I don't -- he's for registration of guns I think the only people who are going to show up to register or get a license -- I guess licensing, like a driver's license with a gun -- the only people who are going to show up are law-abiding citizens..."

PBS Debate Transcript:
"...
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: Well, I'm not for registration. I am for licensing by states of new handgun purchases.
MR. LEHRER: What does that -- what's that mean?
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: Sort of a license ID, like a driver's license, for new handguns. And, you know, the Los Angeles --
MR. LEHRER: Excuse me, you would have to get the license -- a photo ID to go in and -- before you could buy the gun?
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: Correct.
MR. LEHRER: All right. And who would issue --
VICE PRESIDENT GORE: The state..."

Jerry Politex (Bushwatch/TomPaine):
"...Fact: "Gore actually favors licensing for new handgun purchasers but nothing as vast as registering all guns." Salon, 10/12/00..."

1
AG2-01 Al Gore and the internet Bush

"...In the first debate, after Gore pointed out some of the differences between the two candidates' positions on Medicare, Bush replied, "I'm beginning to think this man not only invented the Internet, he invented the calculator."..."

The statement that Al Gore (claimed to have) "invented the internet" is blatantly false. 

See eRiposte Al Gore media bias page for relevant links.

1
AG3-01 Al Gore and Willie Horton Bush (campaign)

"...said last week that the campaign studied Gore's 1988 presidential bid and closely tracked this year's Democratic primary fight...Gore, they argue, was the first candidate to raise the specter of Willie Horton in the 1988 primary..."

  Daily Howler:
"...As [Ceci] Connolly knows well-as she has reported in the past-Gore never mentioned Horton's name in the 1988 primaries. In one debate (out of 42 total), he criticized the Massachusetts furlough program which had given Horton a weekend pass. But he never mentioned anyone's name; never mentioned anyone's race; never ran an ad on the subject; and never used any photos at all. The claim that Gore engaged in "slash-and-burn politics against fellow Democrats" by "raising the specter of Willie Horton" seems impossible to square with the facts. But these facts are never mentioned in this article-an article in which Gore is repeatedly accused by Bush and Bush officials of being "integrity-challenged," "negative," "a man who feels like he can say what he wants," and someone who feels "free and comfortable about saying things that simply aren't true." "Voters are tired of slash-and-burn politics," Bush's advisers are quoted saying in a large presentation above the article's headline. But in the midst of these accusations and pious claims, Bush's team makes a serious and baldly false claim about Gore. And Connolly-though she knows the facts-never challenges or corrects their assertions, or places them in a full context.
Does Connolly know the facts in question? She has explained them in the Post in the past. Here is her account of this matter in a January 24 article:
But one week later, Bradley was digging up a 15-year-old vote Gore cast on tobacco while in Congress. He then revived the debate over Gore's role in raising the prison furlough of murderer Willie Horton against Michael Dukakis in the 1988 presidential campaign. Although Gore was in fact the first to tar Dukakis with that criticism, Gore studiously avoided mentioning Horton's name or race...."
1
AG4-01 Al Gore and mother-in-law's prescription drug costs Bush ad

"...Remember when Al Gore said his mother-in-law's prescription cost more than his dog's? His own aides said the story was made up..."

Daily Howler:
"...The ad shows a 9/19 Washington Times article. Headline: "Aides concede Gore made up medicine story." But we've found someone else who makes lots of things up—the Washington Times often makes up good stories. Here is the actual part of the Times story where the "Gore aides" make their "concession:"
BOYER AND SCULLY: In fact, Gore aides yesterday could not say whether the candidate's mother-in-law pays for the arthritis medication Lodine out of her own pocket or if the cost is covered by insurance.
Does that sound like the aides "said the story was made up?" The aides said they didn't know how Gore's mom-in-law pays for the drugs. But Gore had never said anything about that. He said (correctly) that his mother-in-law and his dog both use the drug, and that the drug costs more for humans than for pets. Here's the actual quote which appeared in the press—the only quote which appeared in the press. Gore: "While it costs $108 a month for a person, it costs $37.80 for a dog." Those were figures from a congressional study, which Gore used to sketch out the problem. For the record: Boyer and Scully said Gore was correct about the general problem. They wrote, "Gore's basic premise is correct—prescription drugs in general do cost more for humans than for pets." Sorry, folks. "Gore aides" never said that "the story was made up."..."
1
AG4-02 Al Gore and Bush's Prescription drug plan Bush

"...[Gore] talks about numbers. I’m beginning to think, not only did he invent the Internet, but he invented the calculator. (LAUGHTER). 
It’s fuzzy math. It’s to scare them, trying to scare people in the voting booth..."

Bush

"...GORE (to Bush): 95% of all seniors would get no help whatsoever, under my opponent’s plan, for the first 4 or 5 years. Why is it that the wealthiest 1% get their tax cuts the first year, but 95% of seniors have to wait 4 to 5 years before they get a single penny?
BUSH: I guess my answer to that is, the man’s running on Mediscare, trying to frighten people in the voting booth. That’s just not the way I think, and I that’s just not my intentions. That’s not my plan..."

Daily Howler:
"...Earlier—in his second statement of the entire night—Bush had accused Gore of using "phony numbers," and he maintained that critique throughout the debate, not excluding this ten-minute segment...In fact, the discussion of prescription drugs was one of the great battles royales in TV debate history...Bush was dramatically, crazily wrong about his own prescription drug plan (by all accounts, one of the issues in which voters were taking the most interest). Repeatedly, Bush misstated his own plan, attacking Gore’s character in the process. Gore said that seniors earning more than 25 grand would get no help from Bush’s plan for four or five years; Bush insisted that all senior citizens, not just the poor, got "instant help" under his plan. About this, Bush was clearly wrong, as that visit to his web site would have shown. But Bush accused Gore of "fuzzy math" when he correctly described the Bush plan; he said that Gore was "running on MediScare, trying to frighten people in the voting booth."...Brooks Jackson, Inside Politics, next day:
JACKSON: Gore said Bush’s prescription drug plan would at first give not one penny to a couple make $25,000 a year. And this time, Bush bruised the truth when he denied it.
BUSH (on videotape): Under my plan, the man gets immediate help with prescription drugs.
JACKSON: Wrong, unless the man spends $6,000 a year on prescriptions
..."
2

(1 for calling Gore a liar, and 1 for lying compassion about his own plan)

AG4-03 Gore's prescription drugs plan Bush

"...the Gore Plan Provides: No choices, insufficient coverage. Al Gore says he’ll fight for the people against HMOs, but his prescription drug proposal forces seniors to join HMOs selected for them by Washington..."

Jonathan Chait (The New Republic):
"...Or consider prescription-drug coverage, Gore's signature issue. Bush never showed much interest in the topic until his recent free fall, when polls suggested Gore was killing him on it. So rapidly did Bush embrace the issue that he launched the advertisements touting his prescription-drug plan a full week before he unveiled the plan itself. And, again, offering a competing plan was not sufficient--Bush mimicked Gore's arguments as well. The main differences between the candidates' proposals are that Gore would spend more money to insure more seniors and offer drug coverage through the Medicare program itself, while Bush would spend less and rely more heavily on HMOs for coverage. But that hasn't stopped Bush from accusing Gore of "insufficient coverage." Nor has it kept him from imitating the vice president's broadsides against managed care by claiming, perversely, that Gore would "force seniors into a government-run HMO."..."
2
AG5-01 Al Gore and Bush's tax cut proposal Bush

"...accused Vice President Al Gore of using “fuzzy math” when Gore pointed out that Bush’s plan would spend more of the surplus on tax cuts for the wealthiest 1 percent of taxpayers than on education, health, prescription drugs and the national defense combined..."

"...Bush, citing figures his staff said were from a review of his plan by Congress’ Joint Committee on Taxation, said that $223 billion of the total would go to these affluent taxpayers not the some $561 billion the Gore campaign has suggested..."

Daily Howler:
"...For the record, there was one journalist who spoke in real time, discussing Bush’s post-debate lying. Her piece appeared on October 17, 2000. The sub-headline? “Bush seems to be having trouble with math lately.”...[she wrote]
The next day on “Good Morning America,” Bush admitted that Gore’s math wasn’t fuzzy after all. Later that day on CNN, he changed his story again...
Bush’s attack on the vice president’s mathematical calculations has a dual irony. First, Bush was using fuzzy math himself…While Bush accused his opponent of using “fuzzy math,” the Republican candidate’s own statistics were partisan-created rhetoric rather than substantiated facts...
Gore was correct in his statement about Bush’s budget figures. In Bush’s plan, the tax cut for the top 1 percent of Americans ($620 billion) is greater than total domestic spending on education ($47.6 billion), health ($131.9 billion), prescription drugs ($158 billion), and national defense ($45 billion) combined.
Bush’s questionable calculations were made apparent again during the second presidential debate last Wednesday. Again, Bush defended his tax plan, saying that the top 1 percent would receive only $223 billion. Likewise, the Bush campaign cites that only 21 percent of the tax cut goes to the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans. But this 21 percent and associated $223 billion numbers do not include the repeal of the estate tax…
Ignoring these facts, Bush argued that his tax cut for the wealthy was far less than his actual policies and plans demonstrate.

...Who wrote this October 17 critique? Why, it was Melanie Ho, a UCLA senior, writing in the Daily Bruin. While mainstream “journalists” cowered and quaked—and told the world what a liar Gore was—a college student was somehow able to note the “irony” in what Bush was doing. We’ve often asked if high school students could get away with work like the press corps’. In the fall of 2000, only Melanie Ho—a college student—had the courage to get this tale right. Who created the Culture of Lying? Manifestly, your “press corps” did..."

Daily Howler:
"...Consummate clowning would be involved in the effort to shoot down Gore’s statement. But it all began with a blunder by Bush. The morning after that first debate, Bush appeared on Good Morning America. Asked about Gore’s “one percent” claim, Bush seemed to say that the claim had been accurate. Charles Gibson had to ask his question two times. But the second time, he got Bush to answer:
GIBSON (10/4/00): You said all of that. But is he incorrect in saying that you would give to the top one percent of income earners in this country in tax relief more than you would spend on health care, prescription drugs, education, and national defense combined?
BUSH: No. That’s what I just said. I think what people have got to understand is, wealthy people pay a lot of taxes today. And if everyone gets tax relief, wealthy people are going to get tax relief.

To all appearances, Bush had said that Gore’s claim was factually accurate. Clearly, that’s what GMA thought he had said. “We heard Governor Bush just say that Vice President Gore was right on the amount that he’d be spending for the richest Americans,” Diane Sawyer said, a few moments later. Within hours, though, that had changed. By the afternoon of October 4, Candidate Bush was trashing Gore hard, saying that his claims were invented. In an interview with the Baltimore Sun’s Karen Hosler, he basically called Gore a liar: 
HOSLER: [Bush] spoke disparagingly of figures Gore gave regarding Medicare. “I don’t know where he drug up those numbers,” said Bush in his Texas twang, “probably the same place he drug up the numbers on rich people—he made it up.”..."

2

(1 for calling Gore a liar, and 1 for lying compassion about his own plan)

AG5-02 Al Gore and Bush's tax cut proposal Bush

"...Larry Lindsey, Bush's chief economic adviser, proclaimed, "The Joint Committee on Taxation proves that Vice President Gore was badly mistaken, inaccurately portraying Governor Bush's plan as costing sixty percent more than it actually does."..."

Bush

"...I can’t let the man continue with fuzzy math. It’s $1.3 trillion, Mr. Vice President. And it’s going to go to everybody who pays taxes. I’m not going to be a pick-and-chooser. What is fair is everybody who pays taxes ought to get relief..."

The New Republic:
"...Bush staffers have been claiming it would cost just $1.3 trillion over ten years--which, combined with some optimistic assumptions about spending, would keep Bush's budgets from dipping into the red. The problem is that independent analyses show that Bush's tax cut would cost far more than $1.3 trillion, and the Bush campaign has refused to reveal how it came up with the number. This week, though, the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation released an analysis of Bush's plan that showed it would indeed cost only $1.3 trillion. The Bushies immediately announced their vindication. Larry Lindsey, Bush's chief economic adviser, proclaimed, "The Joint Committee on Taxation proves that Vice President Gore was badly mistaken, inaccurately portraying Governor Bush's plan as costing sixty percent more than it actually does." Press accounts dutifully reported the counterclaims in the scrupulously evenhanded style of daily journalism. 
But what the Bush staff did not mention--and none of the reporters realized--is that the JCT data that the Texas governor is touting do not cover the ten-year cost of Bush's tax cut--it covers only the first nine years [CG emphasis]. The Bush campaign has been shockingly dishonest about this. Its press release touts the figure as accounting for the "Current `Ten Year' Budget Period"; the quotes around the phrase "Ten Year" apparently signify that the budget period in question is actually nine years. "Ten Year" is perhaps meant as some sort of figure of speech. Perhaps Bush should rethink his plans to make honesty the central issue of the campaign
..."
2

(1 for calling Gore a liar, and 1 for lying compassion about his own plan)

AG6-01 Al Gore and investment of social security  funds in stocks Bush

"...Now all of a sudden [Gore's] decided it's okay to be managing money in the stock market. First the stock market was roulette and risky, and now the heat's on, and he changes position..."

Daily Howler:
"...But how much were pundits willing to spin you? They were willing to spin you a lot. According to Kelly, Gore's "big tax cuts" were "sudden" and his retirement plan was "abrupt;" Gore had reinvented himself out of nowhere. The great god Spin roared with pride. But had the Gore cuts really come out of nowhere? Ron Brownstein, in the Los Angeles Times, had recently mentioned some facts:

BROWNSTEIN: In January, the Office of Management and Budget estimated the operating budget surplus—that is, funds in federal accounts excluding Social Security—would total $746 billion through 2010. But revenue growth linked to the booming economy has been running so strong that OMB is expected to estimate the on-budget surplus will be as much as $1 trillion larger over that period.
In other words, as everyone (including Kelly) well knows, the projected federal budget surplus will soon officially double. And, as everyone (including Kelly) knows, it is in that context that Gore "suddenly" offered an increase in his proposed tax cuts. Strangely, Kelly never mentions the impending change in surplus projections as he trashes Gore for "suddenly" changing. But luckily, Brownstein isn't a spinner. He described the way the new projections were changing both parties' plans:
BROWNSTEIN: The new money has encouraged a similar pattern of convergence and contrast [between Bush and Gore] on Social Security. Last summer, when he prepared his budget blueprint, Gore was forced to eliminate Clinton's proposal for federally subsidized accounts that would help middle-income worker save for retirement. Gore had to abandon the proposal because he needed the money to fund his education and health care ideas...But the surplus projections have grown so large that Gore today, without retrenching any of his other spending plans, is scheduled to unveil a variation on Clinton's retirement account plan.
How hard is this to figure out? Previously, Gore couldn't afford the retirement accounts. With the new budget projections, they are affordable..."
1
AG6-02 Al Gore's social security plan Bush

"...responded by charging that Mr. Gore's Social Security plan will add no less than $40 trillion to the national debt..."

Paul Krugman (New York Times):
"...That seems like an awfully big number. It turns out to be an estimate of the total value of payments from the general government budget to Social Security, including interest, that will take place over the next 50 years. And I could bore you by explaining why that number is meaningless. The really amazing thing, however, is that the number has nothing to do with Mr. Gore. It's true that Social Security will need transfers from general revenue if Mr. Gore's plan is put into effect. But it will need just as much money if Mr. Gore's plan isn't put into effect. The only way to reduce the required aid would be to reduce the benefits promised to retirees...Maybe blaming Mr. Gore for future mortality wouldn't have worked; but Mr. Bush's advisers seem to think that blaming him for the entire future liabilities of the Social Security system will, or at least can serve temporarily to confuse voters who might otherwise have started to think too clearly about the subject. Only two weeks to go until the election, and we can clean up the mess later, right?..."

Also see: Sam Parry (Consortium News)

1
AG6-03 Al Gore and social security Bush

"...Promoting his own plan to allow workers to invest some of their Social Security money in stocks and bonds, Bush said Gore "doesn't think people are up to the task of managing their own money." "This is analog thinking in a digital age, 28K thinking in a broadband era, and eight-track ideology in an MP3 world," Bush asserted, drawing hearty applause and laughter. "And our nation must move beyond it." Bush has defended his plan to augment Social Security with "personal retirement accounts" against Gore claims that it would drain the underlying Social Security system by $1 trillion over ten years. "My opponent seems to be deliberately missing a trillion dollars. Maybe if you've been in Washington too long you lose your ability to count real money," Bush said..."It is irresponsible for the chairman of the Democratic Party and for Vice President Gore to stoke the fears of seniors while ignoring the hopes of younger workers," Bush said..."

Paul Krugman (New York Times):
"...In context, it's pretty clear he meant that Mr. Gore is an old-economy fuddy-duddy because he insists that you can't spend the same money twice — that you can't divert Social Security taxes into individual accounts for young workers and use that same money to pay benefits to their parents. Well, it's a new economy, but it's not that new. The rules of arithmetic are the same, whether you use a slide rule or a supercomputer..."

Jonathan Chait (The New Republic):
"...Bush acts as if this concept were new. It's not. Indeed, the United States once had a retirement system in which individuals made their own decisions and managed their own money. This system would best be described as "nothing." It's what we had before 1935, and it didn't work terribly well: people who didn't earn lavish incomes over the course of their working lives often ended up in poverty, as did those who gambled on risky investments and lost. That's why FDR's administration created Social Security: to make sure every worker got a pension sufficient to pay for basic necessities like food and shelter...
Bush, cleverly, has turned this into a moral argument. "Al Gore, who calls these bipartisan proposals risky, has a substantial amount of his money invested in the stock market," he claims (erroneously). "Why does he object to young Americans doing the same?" Of course Gore does not object to young Americans, or anybody else, having money in the stock market; he objects to cutting a guaranteed benefit in order for them to do so..."

2

(1 for lying compassion about his plan 1 for lying compassion about Gore)

AG6-04 Clinton/Gore on social security and Medicare Bush

said "...that the Clinton administration did nothing "to strengthen Social Security and repair Medicare,"..."

Richard Cohen (Washington Post):
"...He lies when he says that the Clinton administration did nothing "to strengthen Social Security and repair Medicare," when a fair reading of the administration's record suggests it did...."
1
AG7-01 Al Gore's overall spending plan Bush

"...charged that Gore’s spending proposals are three times what Clinton proposed in 1992...said Gore’s spending proposals are greater than the combination of what Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis proposed in 1984 and 1988, respectively...
[claimed]
Gore’s total spending [proposal was]...$127 billion..."

Issues 2000:
"...
Bush charged that Gore’s spending proposals are three times what Clinton proposed in 1992. But back then, federal spending was constrained by the federal deficit, which has been wiped out during Clinton’s terms.
While Bush is correct that Gore’s spending proposals exceed his, the combination of Bush’s spending plans and tax cuts would eat up more of the surplus than Gore would with his more modest tax cut and his larger spending plans.
To further complicate matters, Bush said Gore’s spending proposals are greater than the combination of what Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis proposed in 1984 and 1988, respectively. However, it appears Bush arrived at the number by using inflation-adjusted spending proposals and comparing them with estimates of Gore’s spending plans prepared by partisan groups such as the Republican staff of the Senate Budget Commitee. Gore’s total spending, according to the campaign, would be about $88 billion a year, not the $127 billion the Bush camp contends. 
Source: Boston Globe analysis of St. Louis debate Oct 18, 2000..."
3
AG7-02 Al Gore's overall spending plan Bush

"...Under Gore’s plan, we’re talking about. adding 20,000 new bureaucrats..."

Issues 2000:
"...ANALYSIS: Bush is basing his claims on a partisan report by the Republican members of the Senate Budget Committee. To get their numbers, they applied today’s ratio of employees to expenditures to their own estimates of Gore’s budget. The assumption-that more spending means more employees-DOESN“T NECESSARILY FOLLOW. In fact, during the 1990s, spending went up (by 38%) while the federal work force went down (by 12%). Source: Presidential Debate, Boston Globe, “Number Crunch”, p. A15 Oct 11, 2000..."
1
AG7-03 Al Gore's overall spending plan Bush

"...The Senate Budget Committee did a study of Gore’s expenditures: it could conceivably bust the budget by $900 billion..."

Issues 2000:
"...GORE: What he’s quoting is not the Senate Budget Committee, it is a partisan press release by the Republicans..." 

[CG note: it appears it was the GOP members of the Budget committee - so it was a partisan release]
1
AG7-04 Al Gore's overall spending plan Bush

"...Bush said Gore was a big spender whose proposals would bust the budget. And he said electing Gore would mean the return of big government..."

Issues 2000:
"...
Bush’s budget has less of a buffer than Gore’s does. Bush’s budget would use all but $265 billion of the surplus, and that is without paying for some of his campaign promises, like missile defense. Gore says he would set aside $660 billion of the surplus for a reserve fund.
Gore said he had helped slim down the federal bureaucracy through his work on the administration’s Reinventing Government initiative. Since 1992, the civilian government work force has fallen by 400,000 people, to 1.82 million, although nearly three-quarters of the reduction has been the Pentagon.
Some analysts measure the size of government by looking at total spending relative to the size of the economy. By that measure, outlays have declined steadily in recent years, to 18.7% of gross domestic product this year. Gore said his plan would push that figure down to 17% by 2008. Source: NY Times analysis of St. Louis debate Oct 19, 2000..."
1
AG8-01 Al Gore and Campaign spending Bush

"...in the first presidential debate, the Republican claimed that the Gore campaign had out-spent his. “This man has out-spent me,” Bush said..."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...In fact, Bush has raised and spent more than twice as much money in this election as Gore has raised and spent. There has been no explanation from the Bush campaign about this remarkable claim and the national news media have not pressed for one, as the media certainly would have if Gore had made a similarly false statement. .."

Daily Howler (1999):
"...According to Ceci Connolly’s Post Magazine cover story (4/4), the Gore campaign hopes to spend $47 million during the upcoming primaries. This would include up to $16 million in federal matching funds--meaning the campaign itself would have to raise $31 million from individual contributors...
CONNOLLY: [W]hile the vice president’s game plan this year is virtually the same as Lamar Alexander’s or Elizabeth Dole’s or George W. Bush’s, his fund-raising machine is bigger, tougher, faster.
But it’s hard to know how to reconcile that with the fund-raising goals we have stated. When Gore is raising $31 million to Bush’s $50 million, how is the Gore “machine” “bigger?” Indeed, Connolly acknowledges the Bush camp’s plan later on in her article:
CONNOLLY: In recent campaigns, wealthy contestants like Ross Perot and Steve Forbes have tossed out the rule book and the matching funds that come with it and spent their own millions with no restrictions. And this year, Texas Gov. George W. Bush, fearing Forbes will again use his wealth to carpet-bomb fellow Republicans, is considering forgoing matching funds in order to bust the spending limits in the early primaries..."

Also see: Daily Howler

1
AG9-01 Al Gore and the environment Bush

"...''I think the vice president is probably going to have to explain what he meant by some of the things in his book, to share with us the philosophy behind some of the standards in the book.''..."

USA Today:
"...Later, Bush acknowledged he has not read ''Earth in the Balance.''..."
1
AG9-02 Clinton/Gore on National forest protection Bush

"...said the Clinton-Gore administration “took 40 million acres of land out of circulation without consulting local officials. … I just cited an example of the administration just unilaterally acting without any input.” ..."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...Bush was referring to a pending administration proposal to protect 40 million acres of roadless areas in national forests from more road building and logging. As the Sierra Club noted in a press release, Bush’s statement was false. “In fact, the Forest Service conducted 600 public meetings about the proposal nationwide and more than one million Americans urged the administration to strengthen the proposal,” the Sierra Club said. “There was ample opportunity for local officials and others to comment on the proposal.” ..."
1
AG9-03 Clinton/Gore on ANWR drilling Bush

"...I just found out the other day an interesting fact, that there's a national petroleum reserve right next to Prudhoe Bay that your administration had opened up for exploration in that pristine area..."

Sierra Club:
"...MISLEADING: The National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska was set aside specifically for potential oil and gas production. Last year, the Administration opened a portion of the NPR-A to leasing and development, being careful to prohibit drilling in environmentally sensitive areas, such as the Colville River Delta and Teshekpuk Lake. The NPR-A lies far to the west of the Arctic National Widllife Refuge and is separated from the coastal plain by the Prudhoe Bay oil fields. Bush would like to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling even though it contains many sensitive areas with unmatched ecological diversity. The coastal plain of the Arctic Refuge is home to polar bears, caribou, musk oxen and other rare species..."
1
AG10-01 Clinton/Gore Army divisions ill-prepared for combat Bush

said "...that two of the Army's 10 active divisions are so ill-prepared for combat that, if called, they would have to report, "Not ready for duty, sir."..."

Richard Cohen (Washington Post):
"...The Army says Bush is flat-out wrong...."

Issues2000:
"...Bush had said: “If called on by the commander-in-chief today, two entire divisions of the Army would have to report ‘Not ready for duty, sir.’” But Maj. Thomas Collins, an Army spokesman, told CNN: “All 10 Army divisions are combat-ready, fully able to meet their war-fighting mission.”..."

1
AG10-02 Clinton/Gore Military spending Bush

said "Not since the years before Pearl Harbor has our investment in national defense been so low as a percentage"

Paul Krugman (New York Times):
"...Strangely, if you looked at the numbers put out by his economic team, you found that he actually proposed to reduce that percentage further, spending substantially less on defense than his opponent..."

POST-SCRIPT (2001)
"...Last week, according to newspaper reports, Mr. Bush told lawmakers that there would be "no new money this year for defense." Karen Hughes, a counselor to Mr. Bush, conceded that "we may in fact need resources" for the military — may? after all that martial rhetoric? — but made it clear that there was no rush. One officer bitterly declared, "It sounds like campaign promise No. 1 being broken."..."

(Note that increased defense spending was proposed by the administration only after its 2001 tax cut passed)

1
AG11-01 Clinton/Gore on children Bush

claiming "...Clinton and Al Gore "have done nothing to help children"..."

Richard Cohen (Washington Post):
"...His team--now I am including Dick Cheney--lies when it says Clinton and Al Gore "have done nothing to help children" when children, it can be fairly said, have been an obsession of this administration. Among other things, the Clinton administration doubled the funding of Head Start. Bush himself now professes love for this program, which Cheney, while he was in the House, voted to abolish....."
1
AG12-01 Clinton/Gore on tax cuts Bush

"...You were promised a middle class tax cut in 1992. It didn't happen..." (suggesting Clinton/Gore didn't keep a promise)

Jerry Politex (Bushwatch):
"...Fact: "The administration negotiated a budget bill with the Republican Congress in 1997 that included a children's tax credit that reduced taxes for the middle class." (E.J. Dionne, Jr., Houston Chronicle, 10/18/00) --Politex, 10/19/00..."
1
AG13-01 Al Gore and EITC Bush

"...I felt during his debate with Senator [Bill] Bradley saying he [Gore] authored the EITC [earned-income tax credit] when it didn't happen..."

Jerry Politex (Bushwatch/TomPaine):
"...Fact: "Actually, Gore had claimed to have authored an "expansion of the earned-income tax credit," which he did in 1991." Salon, 10/12/00..."
1

 

STATEMENTS RELATING TO BUSH'S CHARACTER/BELIEFS <go back to the top>

Compassion Con credits total = 33

# Topic Gov. Bush or his team's Compassionate statement Some Uncompassionate Facts Compassion Con Credits
BS1-01 Being a moderate Bush

"..."Real Plans for Real People."... "Compassionate conservatism"... "Reformer With Results"..."

Jonathan Chait (The New Republic):
"...
Last Monday, George W. Bush visited a retirement home to discuss Medicare and prescription drugs. On Tuesday, his topic again was health care. On Wednesday, he turned to the environment. On Thursday, it was education and the achievement gap. The theme, his campaign explained, was "Real Plans for Real People." 
Or, put another way, "I'm a moderate"--which has been the message behind practically every Bush slogan for the last year. "Compassionate conservatism" meant "I'm different from the Republican Congress." "Reformer With Results" meant "I'm as different from the Republican Congress as John McCain is." Bush's convention refrain--"They have not led. We will"--meant "I'll pursue the same goals as the Clinton-Gore administration, only more effectively." "Real Plans for Real People" means "My policies are as mainstream as Al Gore's."
Given the political landscape--most voters support the Democratic positions on major issues--Bush's message of moderation is good strategy. It is also a lie. In the substance of his program, Bush is running to the right of Bob Dole in 1996 and to the right of today's Republican Congress...His proposed policies, if enacted, would alter government more dramatically than anything in the last three generations. "We will look back at the Bush years," predicts GOP activist Grover Norquist, "as moving the country further and faster toward individual liberty than the Reagan years." Conservative columnists George Will and Lawrence Kudlow have independently hailed Bush and Dick Cheney as the Republican Party's most conservative ticket since Calvin Coolidge. Accordingly, conservatives--the same cantankerous bunch that castigated stalwarts like Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott as apostates--have fallen behind Bush in lockstep...." 
(read more on the evidence Chait provides)
1
BS2-01 Drug use Bush

"...“Could I pass the challenge of a background check? My answer is absolutely,” Bush said. “Not only could I pass the background check and the standards applied to today’s White House, but I could have passed the background check and the standards applied on the most stringent conditions when my dad was President -- 15-year period.”..."

Jake Tapper (Salon):
"...Under a barrage of tenacious media inquiries, as well as polling data indicating that the American people find the question relevant, Bush finally decided to abandon his refuse- to- answer- questions strategy. In a testy exchange with a reporter on August 18, he said that he would be able to pass the traditional White House background check question as to whether he'd used drugs in the past seven years.
But that answer only raised more questions than it answered, and amid a hail of media criticism Bush felt impelled to issue yet another clarification the next day, extending the time frame when he could have passed the background check to include the time when his father was president -- "a 15-year period." Finally, a Bush spokesperson expanded the definition yet again, stating that Bush was saying he had not used illegal drugs at any time since he was 28, in 1974 -- the year he graduated from Harvard Business School and moved back to Texas.
(The Clinton White House background check, it should be noted, asks prospective senior officials if they have ever used illegal drugs since the age of 18. Bush refuses to answer that question.)..."Bush has now created this whole narrative which could be interpreted as Clintonian obfuscation," says William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard. "And that chips away at this picture we've been presented with of Bush as the white knight leading Republicans back into the White House."..."

Also see: Jake Tapper (Salon)

1
BS2-02 Drug use

Bush

"...It's time for some politician to stand up and say, "Enough is enough of this." The game of trying to force me to prove a negative and to chase down unsubstantiated ugly rumors has got to end..."

 

Daily Howler:
"...Bush says he won't discuss what he may have done wrong, because it may make young people think it's OK. But he has widely discussed the fact that he drank heavily until he was forty years old. To believe Bush didn't do drugs is to believe the following: on principle, he won't discuss the thing he didn't do, while discussing quite freely the thing that he did. We take it as obvious that this makes no sense. But some in the press pretend otherwise...
EVANS: The "Big Question" for Gov. George W. Bush, Jr., of Texas. Governor, there are and have been rumors—lots of them—of your possible past use of hard drugs. Sir, is it not now in your interest to tell us flatly that the rumors are or are not true?
GOV. BUSH: You know, Rollie, when I first got started on this campaign I started hearing about these ridiculous rumors. I made my mind up at that time not to chase every single rumor that had been floated about me...It's time for some politician to stand up and say, "Enough is enough of this." The game of trying to force me to prove a negative and to chase down unsubstantiated ugly rumors has got to end.
...But, despite the artless questioning of the occasional host, Bush is not being asked to "disprove a rumor." He is being asked to answer a question, one which every presidential candidate has been asked since the 1988 campaign. The 1988 admissions by candidates Gore and Babbitt resulted from The Question. In 1992, Candidate Clinton's famous statement that he didn't inhale resulted from the same process. Every other candidate in the present race has been asked the question which Bush has been asked. No one asked them to prove their case when they said that they didn't use drugs..."

2
BS3-01 Use of focus groups/ polling Bush

"...said, “I think you've got to look at how one has handled responsibility in office, whether or not … you've got the capacity to convince people to follow; whether or not one makes decisions based upon sound principles; or whether or not you rely upon polls and focus groups on how to decide what the course of action is. We've got too much polling and focus groups going on in Washington today. We need decisions made on sound principles.” ..."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...Left out was that Bush’s campaign has spent roughly $1 million on polls and focus groups during this campaign, about equal to the Gore campaign’s spending, according to a report by NBC News. [Oct. 6, 2000]. Indeed, Bush changed his campaign slogan from “Compassionate Conservative” to “Real Plans for Real People” because of poll analysis done by his campaign. .."

Daily Howler:
"...
Weisman did introduce one new idea—the idea that Bush has done the same things as Gore, but just hasn't been ridiculed for it. Indeed, we were struck by that very same thought when we read Terry Neal's piece in last Friday's Washington Post. According to Neal, the GOP is "planning a summer convention that minimizes attack politics." Why has the party decided to play down attacks? Here was one part of the background:
NEAL: Last month, the Texas governor's campaign held focus group discussions and concluded that Vice President Gore's biggest liability with voters is his personality—particularly when he's in attack mode. The information collected there as well as polling data has persuaded the campaign to take the high road and deviate from its original strategy, which Bush indicated in March would include direct and frequent attacks on Gore.
Ohmigod! According to Neal, the Bush campaign has used focus groups and polling data, and changed the hopeful's approach! If you wanted to, you could almost say that Bush had thus "reinvented himself." Indeed, Neal also stated in his piece that Bush will avoid certain issues at the convention:
NEAL: The campaign is trying to focus the event narrowly on the issues Bush has concentrated on since effectively wrapping up the nomination in March: education, Social Security and Medicare, "compassion subjects" (empowerment and revitalization), and national defense...Notably absent from the agenda are tax cuts and abortion.
Bush's tax cut was once "rolled out" as a major part of his campaign...."

2
BS4-01 White House guest sleepovers  Bush

"...“I believe they've moved that sign, ‘The buck stops here,’ from the Oval Office desk to ‘The buck stops here’ on the Lincoln bedroom, and that's not good for the country. It's not right. We need to have a new look about how we conduct ourselves in office,” Bush said. .."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...What Bush left out was that since he took office in 1995, he has had 203 guests stay over at the Governor’s Mansion in Austin, Texas. More than half of them have contributed to his campaign, amounting to $2.2 million. [The Public I]..."
1
BS5-01 Air National Guard Bush

"...In his 1999 autobiography A Charge to Keep, Mr. Bush offers a lyrical description of his flight training in the F-102 fighter. "I continued flying with my unit for the next several years," he writes..."

"...His campaign biography states that he flew with the unit until he won release from the service in September 1973, nine months early, for graduate school..."

Joe Conason (New York Observer):
"...That simply isn’t true: Lieutenant Bush never flew another jet after being suspended from flight duty in August 1972 for failing to take a mandated annual physical..."

Eric Alterman (MSNBC/WLM page 173):
"...But both claims are false. Bush flew with the 111th for 22 months, until April 1972, and never flew again..."

Note: Uggabugga's table is good. Also see AWOLBush.

2
BS5-02 Air National Guard Bush

"...Further along [in his 1999 autobiography] he says his military service "gave me respect for the chain of command."..."

Joe Conason (New York Observer):
"...Not enough respect, apparently, to report for duty as ordered, since his records show that he ignored two direct orders to do so..."
1
BS5-03 Air National Guard Bush

"...claim that he vaulted ahead of the Air Guard waiting list because he was willing to fly an airplane, and there were openings..."

"They were looking for pilots, and I was honored to serve.", Governor Bush told the Dallas Morning News. [DMN9/08/99]..."

  Democrats.com:
"...
“But Tom Hail, a historian for the Texas Air National Guard, said that records do not show a pilot shortage in the Guard squadron at the time. Hail, who reviewed the unit's personnel records for a special Guard museum display on Gov. Bush's service, said Bush's unit had 27 pilots at the time he began applying. While that number was two short of its authorized strength, the unit had two other pilots who were in training and another awaiting a transfer. There was no apparent need to fast-track applicants, he said.” [LAT 7/4/99]
“The Texas Air Guard had about 900 slots for pilots, air and ground crew members, supervisors, technicians and support staff. Sgt. Donald Dean Barnhart, who still serves in the Guard, said that he kept a waiting list of about 150 applicants' names. He said it took up to a year and a half for one name to move to the top of the list.  "Quite a few gentlemen were wanting to get in," he recalled.  For Bush, there was no wait. He met with commander Staudt in his Houston office and made his application--all before his graduation in June.” [LAT, 7/4/99]

“Beckwith, Bush's spokesman, painted a different picture. He said that the Guard needed pilots at the time and Bush was available. "A lot of people weren't qualified" or willing to fly, he said, so special commissions were offered to those willing to undergo the extra training required.”
 [LAT 7/4/99]

“But Shoemake, who also served as a chief of personnel in the Texas Guard from 1972 to 1980, remembers no pilot shortage. "We had so many people coming in who were super-qualified," he said.” [LAT 7/4/99]
“Records from his [Bush’s] military file show that in January 1968, after inquiring about Guard admission, Mr. Bush went to an Air Force recruiting office near Yale, where he took and passed the test required by the Air Force for pilot trainees. His score on the pilot aptitude section, one of five on the test, was in the 25th percentile, the lowest allowed for would-be fliers.” [7/4/99]..."
2
BS5-04 Air National Guard Bush

"...Bush and his campaign have said that he performed "alternative" duty at the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron in Montgomery from May to November 1972, while he was working on a Senate race in Alabama..."

"...Bush has said that he has “some recollection” of attending drills that year, but has not been more specific..."

Bush campaign

(provided a) "...tattered piece of attendance record (which lists no months, years, or last name)...as evidence of attending Air National Guard training..."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...
Bush has a one-year gap in his National Guard duty from 1972-1973 when he was supposed to have transferred from the Texas Air National Guard to the Alabama Air National Guard. According to the Boston Globe, “In his final 18 months of military service in 1972 and 1973, Bush did not fly at all. And … for a full year, there is no record that he showed up for the periodic drills required of part-time guardsmen.” [Boston Globe, May, 23, 2000]. Bush has said that he has “some recollection” of attending drills that year, but has not been more specific. Under Air National Guard rules at the time, anyone who did not report to required drills could be inducted in the draft to serve in Vietnam, according to the Globe. That never happened to Bush. The press has reported these gaps in Bush’s record, but has not pressed the issue as a story worthy of determined pursuit or pundit show commentary. Similarly, Bush’s implausible answers have not led to questions from the media about Bush’s veracity..."

Eric Alterman (MSNBC/WLM page 173):
"...
But, the Globe notes, Bush’s own records contradict that assertion. In May 1972, Bush sought a permanent transfer to a postal unit in Alabama that didn’t require weekend drills or active duty. Guard headquarters overruled that decision. Bush did not do any drills from May through September 1972. In September 1972, Bush won approval to do temporary "alternative" training at the 187th Squadron in Montgomery. He was cleared to attend weekend drills in October and November. But two of the 187th’s officers said Bush never appeared. One of them, retired Brig. Gen. William Turnipseed, says he is "dead-certain he didn’t show up." Bush, who refuses all interviews on the subject, says he was there, but can’t remember anything he did. His campaign can find no records to corroborate this..."

Also see Talion.com for a copy of the report from May 1973 signed by his superiors stating that Bush stopped flying after May 1972. 

Talion.com:
"...The tattered piece of attendance record (which lists no months, years, or last name) which the Bush campaign presented as evidence of attending Air National Guard training is not even from the Air National Guard. This incomplete scrap of paper is from the Air Force Reserve punishment unit, not the Air National Guard. (13) Note the ARF (Air Reserve Force) listing at the top, rather than the ANG designator, which would indicate it was from the Air National Guard..."

Talion.com:
"...1. A September 29, 1972 Air National Guard confirming orders “suspending 1st Lt. George W. Bush from flying status are confirmed...Reason for Suspension: Failure to accomplish annual medical exam.”...4. In Fall 1973, as an automatic disciplinary action, Bush was reassigned to the Obligated Reserve Section in Denver, because he disobeyed orders to show up for a mandatory flight physical and therefore was unable to fulfill the last two years of his six-year obligation as an Air National Guard jet fighter pilot..."

Daily Howler:
"...
Andrew Sullivan suggests that Paul Krugman has glossed the facts of the “missing year” case. Sullivan refers to a New York Times report of November 3, 2000. The report directly referenced Robinson’s prior work; in it, Jo Thomas judged that “some of [Robinson’s] concerns may be unfounded. Documents reviewed by The Times showed that Mr. Bush served in at least 9 of the 17 months in question.” Thomas’ short, 539-word piece was, in fact, quite sketchy. Even she found a “seven-month gap” (April 1972 to November 1972) in which Bush performed no service. In some ways, Thomas even seemed a bit slick. For example, she quoted General Turnipseed in such a way as to suggest that Bush had served in Alabama (see Sullivan’s item today). But she failed to mention Turnipseed’s repeated statements that Bush had not served there..." 

Also see this Daily Howler series for a detailed examination of the above.

2
BS5-05 Air National Guard Bush

"I can't remember what I did, but I wasn't flying because they didn't have the same airplanes. I fulfilled my obligations."

Democrats.com:
"...
On June 26th this report appeared in the Dallas Morning News. “Campaigning Friday in Tuscaloosa, Ala., Bush was asked about his 1972 service in that state. "I was there on a temporary assignment and fulfilled my weekends at one period of time," he said. "I made up some missed weekends." "I can't remember what I did, but I wasn't flying because they didn't have the same airplanes. I fulfilled my obligations."  
The Truth
He was no longer flying because he had been suspended in August of 1972 for failure to “accomplish” a required medical exam. [Boston Globe, 5/23/00] (Suspension document at http://www.cis.net/~coldfeet/grounded.gif
Bush was suspended from flying on August 1, 1972, prior to his request for the transfer to the187th at Montgomery Alabama, September 5, 1972.  Bush did not receive permission until September 15, which was close to six weeks after his suspension from flying.
Another question is raised by the fact that he cannot remember what he did for the Air National Guard in Alabama, despite the fact that 28 years later he still remembers the specifics of his work there on the campaign of William Blount as cited in a July 22, 2000 New York Times article. “In an interview 28 years later, Mr. Bush remembered the numbers. "We all teamed together and helped Red get about 36 percent of the vote," he said with a short laugh, "in spite of the fact that Nixon had gotten 72 percent of the vote. The ticket-splitting was phenomenal."”..."
1
BS5-06 Air National Guard Bush

"...As for Mr. Bush’s curious failure to take the annual physical in 1972, the only excuse he has offered is that he was in Alabama working on a Republican Senate campaign and couldn’t get back to Houston for a checkup by his personal physician..."

Joe Conason (New York Observer):
"...That, too, is blatantly untrue. For as Mr. Bush surely knows—having undergone such examinations in previous years—only a certified Air Force flight surgeon may conduct a pilot physical..."

RealChange:
"...his story also changed on why he refused to take a medical exam -- including a drug test - in 1972. (The refusal ended Bush's flying career.) His staff first claimed that he didn't take the physical because he was in Alabama and his personal physician was in Houston. But flight physicals can be administered only by certified Air Force flight surgeons, and there were surgeons assigned at the time to Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, where Bush was living. His staff now admits that that explanation was "wrong", without saying where it came from or what the real reason was..."

1
BS5-07 Air National Guard Bush

"...[claimed that] he tried to volunteer for service in Vietnam "to relieve active-duty pilots."..."

Joe Conason (New York Observer):
"...The twists and turns of Mr. Bush’s military record are too complex for an exhaustive analysis in this space. Among the questionable claims in his book is that he tried to volunteer for service in Vietnam "to relieve active-duty pilots." In a more candid mood in 1998, however, he told a reporter for The Fort Worth Star-Telegram, "I don’t want to play like I was somebody out there marching [to war] when I wasn’t. It was either Canada or the service and I was headed into the service."..."

RealChange:
"...He has stated on several occasions that he did not want to be an infantryman, and acknowledges that he came to oppose the war itself. He claims that he joined the guard to fly planes, and would have been happy to go to Vietnam, but ignores the obvious choice of the Air Force or the Navy -- which his dad, a genuine war hero, joined. Furthermore, when he signed up for the Guard, he checked a box saying "Do not volunteer for overseas service." Later, he made a perfunctory application to transfer to a program called "Palace Alert", which dispatched F-102 pilots to Europe or the Far East -- and just occasionally Vietnam -- for 3 or 6 month assignments. But Bush was not nearly qualified, as he must have known, and was immediately turned down, and the F-102 not used overseas after June, 1970 in any case..."

1
BS5-08 Air National Guard Bush

"...Bush has said no one to his knowledge helped him get into the National Guard. “I asked to become a pilot,” Bush said. “I met the qualifications, and ended up becoming an F-102 pilot,” The Associated Press reported. Bush insisted that he knew of no special treatment. [AP, July 5, 1999] ..."

Sam Parry, Consortium News:
"...But the record indicates that, despite having the lowest acceptable score for entry, Bush jumped over other young men waiting to get into the National Guard. Other accounts suggest that a “good friend” of Bush’s father, George H.W. Bush, then a congressman from Houston who supported the war, weighed in with Ben Barnes, the Texas Speaker of the House, to arrange a slot for George W. Bush. [The Guardian (U.K.), July 29, 1999]. Sometime in late 1967 or early 1968, Barnes “personally asked the top official of the Texas Air National Guard to help George W. Bush obtain a pilot's slot in a Guard fighter squadron,” The Washington Post reported. [Sept. 21, 1999]. On Sept. 27, 1999, Barnes submitted a sworn statement that he helped Bush by contacting Brig. Gen. James M. Rose..."

RealChange:
"...
On May 27, 1968, George Bush Jr. was 12 days away from losing his student draft deferment, at a time when 350 Americans a week were dying in combat. The National Guard, seen by many as the most respectable way to avoid Vietnam, had a huge waiting list -- a year and a half in Texas, over 100,000 men nationwide. Yet Bush and his family friends pulled strings, and the young man was admitted the same day he applied, regardless of any waiting list. 
Bush's unit commander, Col. "Buck" Staudt, was so excited about his VIP recruit that he staged a special ceremony for the press so he could have his picture taken administering the oath (even though the official oath had been given by a captain earlier.)...Of course, it later came out in court that a close Bush friend, Simon Adger, had asked Barnes to get Bush Jr. into the Guard, and that Barnes did so, via General Rose...
George Bush Jr. admits that he knew Adger socially at the time, and further admits that he lobbied Col. "Buck" Staudt, the commander of the VIP unit Bush joined. Staudt claims that he, not General Rose (who he later replaced), was the one who made the decision on admissions anyway. Bush Jr. admits that he met Staudt in late 1967, during Christmas vacation of his senior year, called him later, and -- in Bush's words -- "found out what it took to apply."
When asked how Bush came to call Staudt, his spokeswoman Karen Hughes said he "heard from friends while he was home over the Christmas break that ... Colonel Staudt was the person to contact." She says that Bush doesn't recall who those "friends" were. But we know that Sid Adger was also a friend of Staudt's, served with him on the Houston Chamber of Commerce's Aviation Committee, and in 1967 held a luncheon honoring Gen. Staudt and his unit for winning an Air Force commendation. In fact, both of Adger's sons also joined General Staudt's unit, in 1966 and 1968 respectively..."