|
UNIVERSITY OF COMPASSIONATE
CONSERVATISM (what
is this?)
You have selected
COMPASSIONATE
CONSERVATISM
203B*
*President Bush's lies
and deception moral clarity,
honesty and integrity
on Iraq and (non-nuclear) "WMDs"
and other weapons
In this course you will learn about the
abundant lies, deception or
intent to deceive moral clarity, honesty and integrity displayed by compassionate conservative2
President George W. Bush (and his administration speaking on his behalf)
on the issues of Iraq and non-nuclear "WMDs"
and other weapons. This
part covers his (Government's) statements on Iraq/Saddam's biological,
chemical and conventional weapons/capability - made before and after the invasion of
Iraq and some statements made before but evaluated after the invasion.
Make sure you drop by again when the Election 04 (2004) campaign starts
picking up steam, so that you can refresh your memory on his
compassion. Please
note that the statements made by Bush or his
spokespersons/administration3 - as
cited in column 3 of the tables below - are by default extracted from
one or more of the links shown in column 4. If the source of the
statements is different from the link(s) in column 4, then a URL is
explicitly provided in column 3. For feedback and corrections, please go
here. A detailed
acknowledgement of the sites from which the information below was
obtained is listed at
this location. In particular, I would like to acknowledge the
following sites where I got the vast majority of links from: Atrios/Eschaton,
Politics, Law and
Autism, Calpundit,
Buzzflash, Talking
Points Memo, Daily
Howler, Thinking
it Through, Bushwatch,
Spinsanity.
Total Compassion Con credits 2
available from this course to date = 100
Last
Update: 11/18/2003
BEFORE THE INVASION
"To questions about whether the
attacks on Sept. 11 turned Bush into a better leader, Rove answered that
Bush was a great leader all along," the Washington Post reported on
December 12: " 'I for one don't buy this theory that September 11th
somehow changed George Bush,' " Rove said. " 'You're just
paying better attention. He is who he is.' "
"In a lot of ways he is exactly how he's always been, and I think
people sort of see him now for how he's always been - very steady, and
very disciplined, and a lot of resolve, but also a whole lot of
compassion and a way to really connect with people," Laura [Bush]
told Tim Russert on December 23.
(from Mark Crispin
Miller, The
Bush Dyslexicon)
Touché.
Quotes
below via Billmon/Whiskey Bar
"...Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam
Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction..." - Dick
Cheney
"...Iraq has stockpiled biological and chemical weapons,
and is rebuilding the facilities used to make more of those
weapons. We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein
recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical
weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not
have..." - George W. Bush
AFTER THE INVASION
Nancy Gibbs (Time.com) via Independent-Media
"...Over the past three months, TIME has interviewed
Iraqi weapons scientists, middlemen and former government
officials. Saddam's henchmen all make essentially the same
claim: that Iraq's once massive unconventional-weapons program
was destroyed or dismantled in the 1990s and never rebuilt;
that officials destroyed or never kept the documents that
would prove it; that the shell games Saddam played with U.N.
inspectors were designed to conceal his progress on
conventional weapons systems—missiles, air defenses,
radar—not biological or chemical programs; and that even
Saddam, a sucker for a new gadget or invention or toxin, may
not have known what he actually had or, more to the point,
didn't have. It would be an irony almost too much to bear to
consider that he doomed his country to war because he was
intent on protecting weapons systems that didn't exist in the
first place..."
&c.
(The New Republic):
"...I appreciate people's opinions,
but I'm more interested in news.... And the best way to get
the news is from objective sources, and the most objective
sources I have are people on my staff who tell me what's
happening in the world..."--George W. Bush, in an
interview with Fox News, September 22, 2003
|
Once you are done with the above sections, you may
choose another course by picking one of the options below
STATEMENTS ON IRAQ'S CHEMICAL WEAPONS
BEFORE THE INVASION
<go back to the top>
Compassion Con
credits total = 11
| # |
Topic |
President
Bush or his representative's
Compassionate statement |
Some
Uncompassionate Facts |
Compassion
Con Credits |
| CB1-01 |
Previous
U.S. support for Iraq and Saddam's chemical weapon use |
Rumsfeld
for Bush
"...said he "cautioned" Hussein about the use of
chemical weapons [back in 1983]...Rumsfeld has also said he had "nothing
to do" with helping Iraq in its war against Iran..." |
Michael
Dobbs (Washington Post) via Democrats.com:
"...What U.S. officials rarely
acknowledge is that these offenses date back to a period when
Hussein was seen in Washington as a valued ally. Among
the people instrumental in tilting U.S. policy toward Baghdad
during the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war was Donald H. Rumsfeld, now
defense secretary, whose December 1983 meeting with Hussein as a
special presidential envoy paved the way for normalization of
U.S.-Iraqi relations. Declassified documents show that Rumsfeld
traveled to Baghdad at a time when Iraq was using chemical
weapons on an "almost daily" basis in defiance of
international conventions. The story of U.S. involvement with
Saddam Hussein in the years before his 1990 attack on Kuwait --
which included large-scale intelligence sharing, supply of
cluster bombs through a Chilean front company, and facilitating
Iraq's acquisition of chemical and biological precursors -- is a
topical example of the underside of U.S. foreign policy. It is a
world in which deals can be struck with dictators, human rights
violations sometimes overlooked, and accommodations made with
arms proliferators, all on the principle that the "enemy of
my enemy is my friend."...The administrations of Ronald
Reagan and George H.W. Bush authorized the sale to Iraq of
numerous items that had both military and civilian applications,
including poisonous chemicals and deadly biological viruses,
such as anthrax and bubonic plague...
In a September interview with CNN, Rumsfeld said he
"cautioned" Hussein about the use of chemical weapons,
a claim at odds with declassified State Department notes of his
90-minute meeting with the Iraqi leader. A Pentagon spokesman,
Brian Whitman, now says that Rumsfeld raised the issue not with
Hussein, but with Iraqi foreign minister Tariq Aziz. The State
Department notes show that he mentioned it largely in passing as
one of several matters that "inhibited" U.S. efforts
to assist Iraq.
Rumsfeld has also said he had "nothing to
do" with helping Iraq in its war against Iran. Although
former U.S. officials agree that Rumsfeld was not one of the
architects of the Reagan administration's tilt toward Iraq -- he
was a private citizen when he was appointed Middle East envoy --
the documents show that his visits to Baghdad led to closer
U.S.-Iraqi cooperation on a wide variety of fronts. Washington
was willing to resume diplomatic relations immediately, but
Hussein insisted on delaying such a step until the following
year. As part of its opening to Baghdad, the Reagan
administration removed Iraq from the State Department terrorism
list in February 1982, despite heated objections from Congress.
Without such a move, Teicher says, it would have been
"impossible to take even the modest steps we were
contemplating" to channel assistance to Baghdad. Iraq --
along with Syria, Libya and South Yemen -- was one of four
original countries on the list, which was first drawn up in
1979....On the other hand, Iraq continued to play host to
alleged terrorists throughout the '80s. The most notable was Abu
Abbas, leader of the Palestine Liberation Front..."
|
2 |
| CB1-02 |
Previous
U.S. support for Iraq and Saddam's chemical weapon use |
Powell
for Bush
"...Saddam Hussein has used such weapons. And Saddam Hussein has no
compunction about using them again -- against his neighbors and
against his own people..."
Cheney
for Bush
"...The whole range of weapons of mass
destruction then would rest in the hands of a dictator who has
already shown his willingness to use such weapons, and has done
so, both in his war with Iran and against his own
people..." |
Peter
W. Galbraith (Boston Globe):
"...In 1987, Hussein turned his chemical weapons on the
Kurds, who the year before had embarked on one of their periodic
rebellions against rule from Baghdad. The effects were
devastating. In a single attack on March 16, 1988, on the
eastern city of Halabja, more than 5,000 Kurdish men, women, and
children died horrific deaths as nerve gas seeped into cellars
where hundreds huddled or caught up with those trying to outrun
the gas on the city's dusty streets.
A few months later, I encountered the survivors of what proved
to be the final gas attacks on the Kurds. On August 25, 1988 -
five days after the Iran-Iraq war ended - Iraq launched a
massive attack on Kurdish villages along its border with Turkey.
Within days, 65,000 refugees had crossed into Turkey...
By the time we arrived in early September, some refugees were
sheltered in Turkish-run tent cities while others remained in
the open in desolate high mountain valleys fringed with patches
of snow. They seemed numb as they described how helicopters and
fixed-wing aircraft flew over their homes, dropping
"quiet" bombs. Smoke smelling of "burnt
almonds" or "rotten onions" wafted across the
landscape. People dropped dead. Those brave enough to venture
close to the corpses noticed "blue lips" and sometimes
small amounts of blood. Because these were not the first such
attacks, the survivors knew better than to touch the corpses;
nerve agents can kill on contact. Men fled, leaving the bodies
of their wives and young children to scavenging animals.
Before we left for Turkey, Senators Pell, Al Gore, and Jesse
Helms had introduced legislation to impose comprehensive
economic sanctions on Iraq for its use of chemical weapons. The
Prevention of Genocide Act of 1988 unanimously passed the US
Senate just one day after being introduced. Van Hollen's and my
report on the gassings was intended to boost the bill's
prospects in the House of Representatives.
Kurdish leaders knew all about the legislation. For the first
time, it seemed the United States was poised to take action on
their behalf. Indeed, at one refugee camp, Van Hollen and I were
feted with an enthusiastic pro-American demonstration.
The Kurds were to be disappointed. The Reagan administration,
which had been providing Iraq with $700 million a year in credit
guarantees, saw Hussein's Iraq both as a potential security
partner in the volatile Persian Gulf and as a promising market
for American products and investment.
Secretary of State George Shultz denounced Iraq's use of
chemical weapons, but others in the administration seemed more
concerned about the Iraqi reaction should the sanctions become
law. (Senate passage of the Pell legislation produced the
biggest anti-American demonstration in Baghdad in 20 years.)
Working with the Republican House leadership and some House
Democrats, the administration was able to water down and
ultimately defeat the Prevention of Genocide Act.
While past error is no indication of future action, the Kurds
have not forgotten that Secretary of State Colin Powell was
then the national security adviser who orchestrated Ronald
Reagan's decision to give Hussein a pass for gassing the Kurds.
Dick Cheney, then a prominent Republican congressman and now
vice president and the Bush administration's leading Iraq hawk,
could have helped push the sanctions legislation but did not..."
[CG emphasis]
|
1
(being very very compassionate here) |
| CB2-01 |
Iraq and
VX |
Powell
for Bush
"...It took years for Iraq to finally
admit that it had produced four tons of the deadly nerve agent,
VX. [...] UNSCOM also gained forensic evidence that Iraq had
produced VX and put it into weapons for delivery. Yet, to this
day, Iraq denies it had ever weaponized VX. And on January 27,
UNMOVIC told this council that it has information that conflicts
with the Iraqi account of its VX program..."
State
Dept. for Bush
"...The UN concluded that Iraq had not
accounted for 1.5 tons of the VX agent. Just one drop is enough
to kill a person..." |
Glen
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) (via
Dennis
Hans):
"...Most chemical and biological agents are subject to
processes of deterioration. A working paper by UNSCOM from
January 1998 noted that: "Taking into consideration the
conditions and the quality of CW-agents and munitions produced
by Iraq at that time, there is no possibility of weapons
remaining from the mid-1980's" (quoted
in Arms Control Today, June 2000)...If the allegations
that Iraq possessed a stockpile of illicit weapons were to be
true, then the UK and US would need to present credible evidence
that Iraq had managed to stabilise its chemical and biological
agents to a greater extent than it is previously thought to have
done...For example, the International Institute for Strategic
Studies (IISS) strategic dossier of September 2002 records the
status of VX produced before the Gulf War: "Any VX produced
by Iraq before 1991 is likely to have decomposed over the past
decade [...]. Any G-agent or V-agent stocks that Iraq concealed
from UNSCOM inspections are likely to have deteriorated by
now."...United States laboratory, which reported in June
1998 that they had found VX degradation products on the missile
warheads. This was seen as indicating at the time that Iraq had
stabilised VX sufficiently and had managed to weaponise it (in
contrast to the Government of Iraq's own claims). However,
further tests on fragments from the same missile warheads at two
other laboratories (in Switzerland and France), and at the same
United States laboratory with further samples, "found no
nerve agent degradation products" (ibid., p.82). The
chemical in question "could also originate from other
compounds such as precursors or, according to some experts, a
detergent" (ibid., p.81)..."
Also see Glen
Rangwala for more details on the VX case.
|
1 |
| CB3-01 |
Iraq and
mustard gas |
State
Department for Bush
"...UNMOVIC has reported that Iraq failed
to provide evidence to account for 1,000 tons of mustard gas,
550 mustard gas-filled munitions..." |
Glen
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) (via Dennis
Hans):
"...With regard to the "1,000 tons of mustard
gas", referred to by the State Department on 27 February
2003, this seems to be an exaggeration. The only mustard that is
unaccounted for except for the artillery shells is the
discrepancy revealed in the Air Force document between the
aerial bombs that Iraq claims it used in the Iran-Iraq war and
the lower figure for those used in that document (see above).
As Hans Blix said (quoted above), the total amount of chemical
agents in these bombs could be around 1,000 tonnes. However, a
considerable proportion of this would be made up of Sarin and
Tabun bombs, agents that would not have lasted for more than a
few months, and not mustard..."
|
1 |
| CB4-01 |
Iraq and
G-agents |
Defense
Dept. for Bush
[claimed that] 200 metric tons of G-agents (sarin)
are unaccounted for.
State
Dept. for Bush
"...Gaps identified by UNSCOM in Iraqi
accounting and current production capabilities strongly suggest
that Iraq maintains stockpiles of chemical agents, probably VX,
sarin, cyclosarin and mustard..." |
Glen
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) (via
Dennis
Hans):
"...The main G-agents produced by Iraq were Tabun, Sarin
and Cyclosarin...These agents deteriorate rapidly, especially if
impurities are present in their manufacture. This seems to have
been the case with Iraq's nerve agents...
Tabun: "documentary evidence suggests that Tabun was
produced using process technology and quality control
methodologies that would result in the agent being degraded to a
very low quality through the action of a resulting
by-product." ("Unresolved
Disarmament Issues", 6 March 2003, p.68).
Sarin / Cyclosarin: "According to documents
discovered by UNSCOM in Iraq, the purity of Sarin-type agents
produced by Iraq were on average below 60%, and dropped below
Iraq’s established quality control acceptance level of 40% by
purity some 3 to 12 months after production. [...] There
is no evidence that any bulk Sarin-type agents remain in Iraq
- gaps in accounting of these agents are related to Sarin-type
agents weaponized in rocket warheads and aerial bombs. Based on
the documentation found by UNSCOM during inspections in Iraq,
Sarin-type agents produced by Iraq were largely of low quality
and as such, degraded shortly after production. Therefore, with
respect to the unaccounted for weaponized Sarin-type agents, it
is unlikely that they would still be viable today."
("Unresolved
Disarmament Issues", 6 March 2003, pp.72-73)...."
|
1 |
| CB5-01 |
Iraq
chemical weapons plants |
State
Department for Bush
"...Iraq continues to rebuild and
expand dual-use infrastructure that it could quickly divert to
chemical weapons production, such as chlorine and phenol
plants..." |
Glen
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) (via
Dennis
Hans):
"...Many of the most detailed claims
made about Iraq since 1998 have been related to the rebuilding
of facilities that were formerly associated with chemical and
biological weapons. It is noticeable that few of these claims
are that a specific facility is currently being used for the
production of chemical or biological warfare agents. Instead,
the facilities are identified as being capable of
producing such agents as well as civilian products, or that the
material that is being produced could be used in the
development of illicit weapons.
Unless there is a reliable assessment that the production
undertaken at these facilities is part of a chemical and
biological warfare programme, the information presented in these
claims cannot be taken as demonstrating that Iraq has recently
produced illicit chemical and biological agents. Indeed, UNMOVIC
inspections have not discovered any facilities in Iraq currently
engaged in the production of chemical or biological weapons. A
significant example is the description provided by UNMOVIC for
the facilities required to produce mustard agents:
"Iraq does not appear to have a dedicated facility
capable of producing Mustard and its key precursors.
Significant modifications would be required to convert existing
chemical production facilities for this purpose. Iraq would have
to utilize “corrosion resistant” equipment (for the
processing of the chlorinating agent), which it possesses in
limited quantities. However, Iraq had some items of dual-use
equipment distributed all over the country at legitimate
facilities that could be removed and assembled for the
construction of a dedicated Mustard production plant".
("Unresolved
Disarmament Issues", 6 March 2003, p.77).
The example of mustard is significant because, according to
UNMOVIC, "Mustard would be the easiest agent for Iraq to
produce indigenously." (ibid.)..."
|
None
assigned since the claim is couched in "safe" words
that cannot be argued against. However, the statement is
compassionate because it does not demonstrate that actual
weapons production is occurring.
I will cover this claim further in the
"after invasion" section. |
| CB5-02 |
Iraq
chemical weapons plants |
Powell for Bush
"..."Iraq has rebuilt key portions
of the Tareq State Establishment. Tareq includes facilities
designed specifically for Iraq’s chemical weapons program and
employs key figures from past programs"..." |
Glen
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) (via
Dennis
Hans):
"...This site,
which used to produce chemical weapons precursors, was bombed in
the Gulf War, and its remaining stocks were removed and
destroyed by UNSCOM. It was inactive in 1998. The claims that it
now produces chlorine and phenol (ie carbolic acid), which could
serve as precursors for the production of weapons, were not
substantiated in UK and US reports. These chemicals could also
be used as disinfectants and in water treatment, and so the
production of these chemicals in themselves would not
necessarily be evidence for a weapons programme.
Results of UN inspections. Fallujah II was inspected by
UNMOVIC inspectors on 9 December 2002. In contrast to the
extensive claims of the CIA and the State Department, UNMOVIC
found that the chlorine plant was not even in use:
"Two separate chemical plants are in the factory area and
their major activity is the production of phenol and chlorine. The
chlorine plant is currently inoperative. The site
contains a number of tagged dual-use items of equipment, which
were all accounted for. All key buildings were inspected in
addition to the chlorine and phenol plants. The objectives of
the visit were successfully achieved."..."
|
1 |
| CB5-03 |
Iraq
chemical weapons plants |
Powell for Bush
"...Here you see 15 munitions
bunkers...the four that are in red squares represent active
chemical munitions bunkers. How do I know that?...a facility
that is a signature item for this kind of bunker. Inside that
facility are special guards and special equipment to monitor any
leakage...The truck you also see is a signature item. It’s a
decontamination vehicle..." |
Greg
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) via Dennis
Hans:
"...(a) This seems ostensibly to be a
wholly implausible claim: a picture of a truck and a shed by
themselves reveal nothing about the contents of the adjacent
bunker. It also begs the question why the US did not provide
this information to the inspectors as soon as they entered Iraq
on 27 November, 25 days before Powell claims al-Taji was
evacuated. If they were genuine in their beliefs, why did they
not allow the independent inspectorate to check verify their
claims?
(b) Dr Blix reminds the Security Council of Powell’s false
inference on 14
February 2003: "The
presentation of intelligence information by the US Secretary of
State suggested that Iraq had prepared for inspections by
cleaning up sites and removing evidence of proscribed weapons
programmes. I would like to comment only on one case, which we
are familiar with, namely, the trucks identified by analysts as
being for chemical decontamination at a munitions depot. This
was a declared site, and it was certainly one of the sites Iraq
would have expected us to inspect. We have noted that the two
satellite images of the site were taken several weeks apart. The
reported movement of munitions at the site could just as
easily have been a routine activity as a movement of
proscribed munitions in anticipation of imminent
inspection."..."
Charles
Hanley (AP) via Common Dreams:
"...Powell presented satellite photos
of industrial buildings, bunkers and trucks, and suggested they
showed Iraqis surreptitiously moving prohibited missiles and
chemical and biological weapons to hide them. At two sites, he
said trucks were "decontamination vehicles" associated
with chemical weapons.
These and other sites have now undergone 500 inspections in
recent months. Chief U.N. inspector Hans Blix, a day earlier,
had said his well-equipped experts had found no contraband in
their inspections and no sign that items had been moved. Nothing
has been reported found since.
Addressing the Security Council a week after Powell, Blix used
one photo scenario as an example and said it could be showing
routine as easily as illicit activity. Journalists visiting
photographed sites hours after the Powell speech found similar
activity to be routine.
Norwegian inspector Jorn Siljeholm told AP on March 19 that
"decontamination vehicles" U.N. teams were led to by
U.S. information invariably turned out to be simple water or
fire trucks. On June 24, Blix said of the entire Powell photo
package, "We were not impressed with that particular
evidence."
Amid Powell's warnings, a critical fact was lost: Iraq's
military industries were to have remained under strict, on-site
U.N. monitoring for years to come, guarding against the
rebuilding of weapons programs..."
|
2 |
| CB6-01 |
Iraq
chemical weapons |
Powell for Bush
"...Saddam Hussein has chemical weapons..."
Powell
for Bush
"...On Sept. 8, 2002, Powell said in a
Fox News interview that ''there is no doubt'' that Saddam
Hussein ''has chemical weapons stocks.''..." |
Colin
Powell (U.N. Speech):
"...We have evidence these weapons existed. What we don't
have is evidence from Iraq that they have been destroyed or
where they are. That is what we are still waiting for...With
Iraq's well-documented history on biological and chemical
weapons, why should any of us give Iraq the benefit of the
doubt? I don't..."
Glen
Rangwala:
"...a false inference that lack of corroborative evidence
for destruction is equal to continued existence of weapons, as
Blix pointedly mentioned in his briefing
to the Security Council of 14 February 2003: "To take
an example, a document, which Iraq provided, suggested to us
that some 1,000 tonnes of chemical agent were ‘unaccounted
for’. One must not jump to the conclusion that they
exist."..."
Bryan
Bender (Boston Globe):
"...The Defense Intelligence Agency, in a classified report
that same month, had a different view: ''There is no reliable
information on whether Iraq is producing or stockpiling chemical
weapons.''..."
|
2 |
STATEMENTS ON IRAQ'S CHEMICAL WEAPONS EVALUATED AFTER THE INVASION <go back to the top>
Compassion Con
credits total = 9
| # |
Topic |
President
Bush or his representative's
Compassionate statement |
Some
Uncompassionate Facts |
Compassion
Con Credits |
| CA1-01 |
Iraqi
chemical/ biological weapons |
Bush/WH
"...[Iraq] could launch a biological or
chemical attack 45 minutes after the order is given..."
|
Dana
Milbank (Washington Post):
"...The White House, in the run-up to
war in Iraq, did not seek CIA approval before charging that
Saddam Hussein could launch a biological or chemical attack
within 45 minutes, administration officials now say.
The claim, which has since been discredited, was made twice by
President Bush, in a September Rose Garden appearance after
meeting with lawmakers and in a Saturday radio address the same
week. Bush attributed the claim to the British government, but
in a "Global Message" issued Sept. 26 and still on the
White House Web site, the White House claimed, without
attribution, that Iraq "could launch a biological or
chemical attack 45 minutes after the order is given."
The 45-minute claim is at the center of a scandal in Britain
that led to the apparent suicide on Friday of a British weapons
scientist who had questioned the government's use of the
allegation. The scientist, David Kelly, was being investigated
by the British parliament as the suspected source of a BBC
report that the 45-minute claim was added to Britain's public
"dossier" on Iraq in September at the insistence of an
aide to Prime Minister Tony Blair -- and against the wishes of
British intelligence, which said the charge was from a single
source and was considered unreliable.
The White House embraced the claim, from a British dossier on
Iraq, at the same time it began to promote the dossier's
disputed claim that Iraq sought uranium in Africa.
Bush administration officials last week said the CIA was not
consulted about the claim. A senior White House official did not
dispute that account, saying presidential remarks such as radio
addresses are typically "circulated at the staff
level" within the White House only.
Virtually all of the focus on whether Bush exaggerated
intelligence about Iraq's weapons ambitions has been on the
credibility of a claim he made in the Jan. 28 State of the Union
address about efforts to buy uranium in Africa. But an
examination of other presidential remarks, which received little
if any scrutiny by intelligence agencies, indicates Bush made
more broad accusations on other intelligence matters related to
Iraq...
As it turns out, the 45-minute charge was not true; though
forbidden weapons may yet be found in Iraq, an adviser to the
Bush administration on arms issues said last week that such
weapons were not ready to be used on short notice..." |
1 |
| CA1-02 |
Iraqi chemical
weapons |
Bush
"...We have seen intelligence over
many months that they have chemical and biological weapons, and
that they have dispersed them and that they're weaponized and
that, in one case at least, the command and control arrangements
have been established..."
|
Christopher
Scheer (AlterNet):
"...FACT: Despite a massive nationwide search by U.S. and
British forces, there are no signs, traces or examples of
chemical weapons being deployed in the field, or anywhere else
during the war..."
Washington
Post:
"...The administration maintained that Iraq was still
producing deadly chemical agents such as mustard, sarin and VX.
Mr. Kay reported that "multiple sources" have told his
1,200-member team "that Iraq did not have a large,
centrally-controlled chemical weapons program after 1991."
In the dozen summary pages of his report made public, Mr. Kay
emphasized that after three months of work his conclusions are
preliminary and that he may yet find chemical or biological
munitions. Yet already enough is known to conclude that both the
president and the nation's intelligence community must be
accountable for misstating, or being mistaken about, the extent
of the Iraqi threat.
.."
|
1 |
| CA1-03 |
Iraqi
chemical weapons |
Powell
for Bush "...Our conservative
estimate is that Iraq today has a stockpile of between 100 and
500 tons of chemical weapons agent..." Bush
NIE "...Although we
have little specific information on Iraq’s CW stockpile,
Saddam probably has stocked at least 100 metric tons (MT) and
possibly as much as 500 MT of CW agents—much of it added in
the last year..." |
Charles
Hanley (AP) via Common Dreams:
"...Powell gave no basis for the assertion, and no such
agents have been reported found. An unclassified CIA report last
October made a similar assertion without citing concrete
evidence, saying only that Iraq "probably" concealed
precursor chemicals to make such weapons. The DIA reported
confidentially last September there "is no reliable
information on whether Iraq is producing and stockpiling
chemical weapons."..."
Bob
Drogin (The New Republic):
"...Kay's interim report all but dismisses those claims as
groundless. "Multiple sources," he wrote, indicate
that Iraq "did not have a large, ongoing, centrally
controlled C.W. program after 1991." Information found so
far, he added, suggests Baghdad's large-scale capability to
develop, produce, and fill new chemical munitions "was
reduced--if not entirely destroyed" by the combined effects
of the 1991 Gulf war, the 1998 Desert Fox air strikes, 13 years
of U.N. sanctions, and nine years of U.N. inspections. Since
large-scale facilities are needed to develop, produce, and fill
chemical weapons for military use, the program was effectively
dead..."
|
1 |
| CA1-04 |
Iraqi
chemical weapons |
Powell
for Bush "...Let me remind you
that -- of the 122 mm chemical warheads that the UN inspectors
found recently. This discovery could very well be, as has been
noted, the tip of a submerged iceberg.
The question before us all, my friends, is when will we see the
rest of the submerged iceberg?..." |
Charles
Hanley (AP) via Common Dreams:
"...The warheads were empty, a fact Powell didn't note.
Blix said on June 16 the dozen stray rocket warheads, never
uncrated, were apparently "debris from the past," the
1980s. No others have been reported found since the invasion..."
|
1 |
| CA1-05 |
Iraqi
chemical weapons |
Kay
for Bush
"...Iraqi practice was not to mark much
of their chemical ordnance and [was] to store it at the same
[sites] that held conventional rounds, the size of the required
search is enormous..." |
Bob
Drogin (The New Republic):
"...That's not quite true. For one thing, U.N. weapons
inspectors checked scores of suspect Iraqi military bases, ammo
dumps, and armories before the war. After it ended, special U.S.
weapons-hunting teams scrutinized scores more that had been
identified by the Defense Intelligence Agency. On May 30, the top
Marine commander in Iraq, Lieutenant General James Conway, told
reporters that his troops had scoured ammo storage sites across
southern Iraq for banned weapons. We've been
to virtually every ammunition supply point between the Kuwaiti
border and Baghdad, but they are simply not there," Conway
said.
There is another problem. If no chemical weapons were produced in
bulk after 1991, as Kay now concedes, then he presumably is
searching for chemical warfare agents or precursors left over from
the '80s in drums or in filled munitions. It's possible that some
will be found. But, except for Iraq's mustard gas, which had a
long shelf life, all of Iraq's known nerve agents were of poor
quality and would have deteriorated years ago. U.N. inspectors who
recovered and destroyed large quantities of those weapons in the
early '90s found they had lost most of their lethality and were
not suitable for warfare.
Moreover, despite Kay's claim, several U.N. inspectors say
Saddam's regime always marked its "special munitions,"
as chemical-filled shells, bombs, and warheads were known. The
markings were neither consistent nor standard--some munitions had
numbers, others a black stripe, others a stenciled white circle,
others just the painted letter "A" or "B."
Nevertheless, they were marked. In fact, the markings were so
well-known that, before the war, the Pentagon produced hand cards
showing the various markings so that military ordnance and
demolition experts could identify chemical weapons. There was good
reason. On March 4, 1991, just after the Gulf war ended, up to
5,000 American troops were exposed when American military
engineers mistakenly destroyed bunkers containing sarin and
mustard gas at the Kamisiyah ammo-storage site in southern Iraq.
No one wanted the accidental release of another toxic cloud.
"Kay's comment gives the impression [chemical weapons] were
kept with conventional munitions, and he'll have to check every
shell," said an American weapons expert who spent seven years
as a U.N. inspector and who strongly supported the war.
"That's baloney. They kept them separated from regular
munitions, they had separate security, and they had separate chain
of command. They were never co-located with conventional
munitions."..."
Also see: Bob
Drogin (Los Angeles Times)
|
2 |
| CA2-01 |
Iraqi VX |
Powell
for Bush "...It took years for
Iraq to finally admit that it had produced four tons of the
deadly nerve agent VX. A single drop of VX on the skin will kill
in minutes. Four tons. The admission only came out after
inspectors collected documentation as a result of the defection
of Hussein Kamel, Saddam Hussein's late son-in-law.
UNSCOM also gained forensic evidence that Iraq had produced VX
and put it into weapons for delivery, yet to this day Iraq
denies it had ever weaponized VX. And on January 27, UNMOVIC
told this Council that it has information that conflicts with
the Iraqi account of its VX program..." |
Charles
Hanley (AP) via Common Dreams:
"...[In this speech] Powell didn't note that most of
that four tons was destroyed in the 1990s under U.N.
supervision. Before the invasion, the Iraqis made a
"considerable effort" to prove they had destroyed the
rest, doing chemical analysis of the ground where inspectors
confirmed VX had been dumped, the U.N. inspection agency
reported May 30.
Experts at Britain's International Institute of Strategic
Studies said any pre-1991 VX most likely would have degraded
anyway. No VX has been reported found since the invasion..."
|
1 |
| CA3-01 |
Iraqi
chemical weapons
plan(t)s |
Powell
for Bush "...We know that Iraq
has embedded key portions of its illicit chemical weapons
infrastructure within its legitimate civilian industry. To all
outward appearances, even to experts, the infrastructure looks
like an ordinary civilian operation. Illicit and legitimate
production can go on simultaneously or on a dime..."
State
Department for Bush
"...Iraq continues to rebuild and
expand dual-use infrastructure that it could quickly divert to
chemical weapons production, such as chlorine and phenol
plants..." |
Charles
Hanley (AP) via Common Dreams:
"...No "chemical weapons
infrastructure" has been reported found. The newly
disclosed DIA report of last September said there was "no
reliable information" on "where Iraq has - or will -
establish its chemical warfare agent-production
facilities."
Many countries' civilian chemical industries are capable of
making weapons agents, and Iraq's was under close U.N.
oversight. The DIA report suggested international inspections,
swept aside by the U.S. invasion six months later, would be able
to keep Iraq from rebuilding a chemical weapons program..."
Dana
Milbank and Walter Pincus (Washington Post):
"...David Kay, the chief U.S. weapons inspector in Iraq,
presented a different view in his congressional testimony last
week. For example, he said: "Information found to date
suggests that Iraq's large-scale capability to develop, produce,
and fill new CW [chemical weapons] munitions was reduced -- if
not entirely destroyed -- during Operations Desert Storm and
Desert Fox, 13 years of U.N. sanctions and U.N.
inspections."
..."
|
1 |
| CA3-02 |
Iraqi
chemical weapons
plan(t)s |
Powell
for Bush "...Saddam Hussein has
chemical weapons...we have sources who tell us that he recently
has authorized his field commanders to use them. He wouldn't be
passing out the orders if he didn't have the weapons or the
intent to use them..." Bush "...We
have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently
authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the
very weapons the dictator tell us he does not have..." |
Charles
Hanley (AP) via Common Dreams:
"...No such weapons were used and none was reported found
after the U.S. and allied military units overran Iraqi field
commands and ammunition dumps. Even before Powell spoke, U.N.
inspectors had found no such weapons at Iraqi military bases..."
Dana
Milbank and Walter Pincus (Washington Post):
"...David Kay, the chief U.S. weapons inspector in Iraq,
presented a different view in his congressional testimony last
week. For example, he said: "Information found to date
suggests that Iraq's large-scale capability to develop, produce,
and fill new CW [chemical weapons] munitions was reduced -- if
not entirely destroyed -- during Operations Desert Storm and
Desert Fox, 13 years of U.N. sanctions and U.N.
inspections."
..."
|
1 |
STATEMENTS ON IRAQ'S BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS
BEFORE THE INVASION
<go back to the top>
Compassion Con
credits total = 14
| # |
Topic |
President
Bush or his representative's
Compassionate statement |
Some
Uncompassionate Facts |
Compassion
Con Credits |
| BB1-01 |
Previous
U.S. shipment of biological toxins to Iraq |
Rumsfeld for Bush
"...At last week's Armed Services
Committee hearing, Secretary [Donald] Rumsfeld said he had no
knowledge of any such shipments and doubted that they ever
occurred..." |
Paul
Nyden (West Virginia Gazette) via TruthOut:
"..."We have a paper
trail," Byrd said. "We not only know that Iraq has
biological weapons, we know the type, the strain, and the batch
number of the germs that may have been used to fashion those
weapons. We know the dates they were shipped and the addresses
to which they were shipped. "We have
in our hands the equivalent of a Betty Crocker cookbook of
ingredients that the U.S. allowed Iraq to obtain and that may
well have been used to concoct biological weapons." Those
shipments included: Between 1985 and 1988, the nonprofit
American Type Culture Collection made 11 shipments to Iraq that
included a "witches' brew of pathogens," including
anthrax, botulinum toxin and gangrene. All shipments were
government-approved. Between January 1980
and October 1993, the federal Centers for Disease Control
shipped a variety of toxic specimens to Iraq, including West
Nile virus and Dengue fever. The U.S. Commerce Department and
CDC provided lists of these shipments..."
|
1 |
| BB2-01 |
Iraq
biological weapons |
Bush
"...From
three Iraqi defectors we know that Iraq, in the late 1990s, had
several mobile biological weapons labs... Saddam Hussein has not disclosed
these facilities. He has given no evidence that he has destroyed
them..."
"...In 1995,
after several years of deceit by the Iraqi regime, the head of
Iraq's military industries defected. It was then that the regime
was forced to admit that it had produced more than 30,000 liters
of anthrax and other deadly biological agents..." |
Alan
Gilbert (Priority Peace):
"..."Hussein
Kamel, the highest-ranking Iraqi official ever to defect from
Saddam Hussein's inner
circle, told CIA and British intelligence officers and U.N.
inspectors in the summer of 1995 that after the gulf war, Iraq
destroyed all
its chemical and biological weapons stocks and the missiles to
deliver them."
Newsweek "The
Defector’s Secrets" 03-03-03
"All chemical weapons were destroyed. I
ordered destruction of all chemical weapons. All weapons -
biological, chemical, missile, nuclear were destroyed" Hussein
Kamel
UNSCOM/IAEA interview transcript, "UNSCOM/IAEA
Sensitive," p. 13 08-22-95 http://www.casi.org.uk/info/unscom950822.pdf..."
Outlook
India:
"..."Several inspections have taken place ... in
relation to mobile production facilities," he [Blix] said.
"No evidence of proscribed activities have so far been
found." Blix said his inspectors had looked into several
mobile facilities as well as "large containers with seed
processing equipment...."
Also see: The
Guardian and see Glen
Rangwala for a more detailed rebuttal of the claims
regarding the "mobile" facilities.
|
1 |
| BB2-02 |
Iraq (biological
weapons) |
Bush admin
"...All key aspects - R&D,
production, and weaponization - of Iraq's offensive BW program
are active and most elements are larger and more advanced than
they were before the Gulf war..."
A lot of quotes are
here. |
Glen
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) (via
Dennis
Hans):
"...It is unclear how seriously the
CIA's claim that Iraq's BW programme is more advanced now than
it was in 1991 should be taken, especially as al-Hakam, Iraq's
main biological weapons facility, had been destroyed under
UNSCOM supervision in May-June 1996. The Security Council's
Panel on Disarmament recorded
in March 1999 that "the declared facilities of Iraq's BW
programme have been destroyed and rendered harmless"
(para.23). In any event, the CIA's claim is contradicted by
other US official assessments. The US General Accounting Office
(GAO), and investigative arm of the Congress, concluded in
September 2002 that: "In the context of the conventional
battlefield, the nature and magnitude of the military BW threat
has not changed materially since 1990 in terms of the number of
countries suspected of developing BW capability, the types of BW
agents they possess, or their ability to weaponize and deliver
BW agents. This is particularly true regarding the ability to
accumulate and deliver sufficient quantities of processed agent
to cause mass casualties."
GAO Report GAO-02-445 (September 2002), p.3,
at:
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02445.pdf..."
AFTER THE INVASION
Bob
Drogin (The New Republic):
"...The Kay report doesn't support that assertion at all..."
|
1 |
| BB2-03 |
Iraq
biological weapons |
Bush
"...the regime was forced to admit that
it had produced more than 30,000 liters of anthrax and other
deadly biological agents. The inspectors, however, concluded
that Iraq had likely produced two to four times that amount.
This is a massive stockpile of biological weapons that has never
been accounted for, and capable of killing millions..." |
Glen
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) (via
Dennis
Hans):
"...The quotes above from the State Department and CIA in
September and October 2002, misrepresent the findings of UNSCOM
most clearly: UNSCOM did not conclude with the State Department
"that Iraq actually produced two to four times the amount
of most agents, including anthrax and botulinim toxin, than it
had declared", but that if the assumptions above were to
hold, the "[q]uantities produced could be at
least 3 times greater than stated" by Iraq (in its January
1999 report, Appendix III). To infer from this to what Iraq
"actually produced" (State Department) is to make a
leap of logic for which there is insufficient evidence.
Similarly, President Bush and Press Secretary Fleischer both
impute views to UNSCOM that never constituted the position of
the inspectorate: in no UNSCOM report is it stated that Iraq is
"likely" to have produced more than it claimed, but
merely that it could have done so.
Furthermore, the claims about Iraq possessing a stockpile of
biological weapons created before 1991 may suffer from the same
problems as discussed for the notion of a stockpile of chemical
weapons, above. The assessment by Professor Anthony H. Cordesman
of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) is
as follows:
"The shelf-life and lethality of Iraq's weapons is unknown,
but it seems likely that the shelf-life was limited. In balance,
it seems probable that any agents Iraq retained after the Gulf
War now have very limited lethality, if any"
"Iraq's Past and Future Biological Weapons
Capabilities" (1998), p.13, at: http://www.csis.org/stratassessment/reports/iraq_bios.pdf..."
Joseph
Cirincione and Dipali Mukhopadyay (Foreign Policy) via Corrente::
"...The U.N. inspectors did not reach this conclusion.
Their final report in 1999 indicated that 520 kilograms (1,144
pounds) of yeast extract (bacterial growth media) remained
unaccounted for and was "sufficient to produce 26,000
litres of Bacillus anthracis spores or over 3 times the amount
declared by Iraq." Inspectors did not know if Iraq had
actually used this growth media to produce more anthrax, nor did
they draw any conclusions about what weapons Iraq might possess.
Iraq's biological weapons, if they existed, could "kill
millions" only if the regime had a large arsenal of
highly-effective long-range missile, rocket, and airborne
delivery systems, such as those that the United States and the
Soviet Union perfected during the Cold War. There was no
evidence that Iraq possessed such delivery systems..."
|
2 |
| BB2-04 |
Iraq
biological weapons |
Bush admin
"...The UN Special Commission
concluded that Iraq did not verifiably account for, at a
minimum, 2160kg of growth media. (repeated by White
House, January 2003, p.5)..." |
Glen
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) (via
Dennis
Hans):
"...It is particularly curious that Dr Blix, in his update
to the Security Council on 27 January 2003, provides a
wholly different set of figures from the US in accounting for
growth media. He claims that 650kg of bacterial growth media is
unaccounted for (unlike the US claims that 2160kg or,
alternatively, 3 tonnes of this media is unaccounted for)..."
|
1 |
| BB2-05 |
Iraq
biological weapons |
Powell for Bush
"...By 1998, U.N. experts agreed that the
Iraqis had perfected drying techniques for their biological
weapons programs..." |
Glen
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) (via
Dennis
Hans):
"...This seems to be untrue. UNSCOM never stated in its
official reports that Iraq had "perfected drying
techniques". UNSCOM recognised that Iraq had experimented
with drying techniques, but seem to have been unsure about
Iraq's success in this regard...
UNMOVIC reached the following conclusions:
"It is most likely that, as it had declared, Iraq was
unsuccessful in 1989/90 in acquiring a special dust-free spray
dryer to safely dry large quantities of anthrax. [...] In any
event, it seems likely that no bulk drying of agent took
place in either 1989 or 1990...
"UNMOVIC has no evidence that drying of anthrax or
any other agent in bulk was conducted." (ibid.,
p.120)..."
|
1 |
| BB2-06 |
Iraq (biological
weapons) |
Bush
"...The United Nations concluded that
Saddam Hussein had materials sufficient to produce more than
38,000 liters of botulinum toxin -- enough to subject millions
of people to death by respiratory failure..." |
Glen
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) (via
Dennis
Hans):
"...Secretary Powell and President Bush both make a claim
about growth material for botulinum toxin that is unaccounted
for, and attribute this claim to the United Nations. Both are
inaccurate. According to the UNSCOM
January 1999 report, the growth media unaccounted for that could
be used for making botulinum toxin consisted of 460kg of casein
and 80kg of thioglycollate broth. It records that this amount
was "Sufficient for the production of 1200 litres of
concentrated botulinum toxin (depending on availability of other
components including yeast extract). This would represent an
additional 6% of that which has already been declared by
Iraq." Although far from being a small volume, the 1200
litres at issue for UNSCOM is quite different in scale from the
38,000 litres described by Secretary Powell and President Bush...
Clostridium botulinum (botulinum toxin) consists of anaerobic
bacilli, which have a short shelf life."
Glen
Rangwala and Raymond Whitaker (Traprockpeace.org):
"...In March, UN inspectors reported: "it seems
unlikely that significant undeclared quantities of botulinum
toxin could have been produced, based on the quantity of media
unaccounted for."..."
|
2 |
| BB2-07 |
Iraq
biological weapons |
Powell for Bush
"...We know from Iraq's past admissions
that it has successfully weaponized [...] ricin..." |
Glen
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) (via
Dennis
Hans):
"...This seems to be untrue. UNSCOM
stated in its January
1999 report, Appendix III, that Iraq only admitted to
attempting field trials using 155mm artillery shells in November
1990. UNMOVIC record:
"Iraq states that a single static field test was conducted
in November 1990, that it was considered to be a failure and
that the project was abandoned. While UNMOVIC finds it probable
that this test occurred, the project was probably abandoned due
to the onset of war rather than the failure of the test. Apart
from this static field test using 155mm artillery shells, there
is no evidence to suggest that Iraq weaponized ricin for
military purposes."
("Unresolved
Disarmament Issues", 6 March 2003, p.116)..."
|
1 |
| BB2-08 |
Iraq
biological weapons |
Bush admin
"...The al-Dawrah Foot and Mouth Disease
Vaccine Facility is one of two known biocontainment level-three
facilities in Iraq that have an extensive air handling and
filtering system. Iraq has admitted that this was a biological
weapons facility. In 2001, Iraq announced that it would begin
renovating the plant without UN approval, ostensibly to produce
vaccines that it could more easily and more quickly import
through the UN..." |
Glen
Rangwala (Traprockpeace.org) (via
Dennis
Hans):
"...Prior to 1991, al-Dawrah was
engaged in research on viral warfare agents. In March 2001, the
Government of Iraq wrote to the UN Secretary-General to notify
him of the reactivation of this facility for the production of
foot and mouth vaccine. This was in the aftermath of a severe
outbreak of the disease, during which "at least 400,000
animals have died for lack of the vaccine", and the
Executive Director of the UN Iraq Programme himself recommended
the reconstitution of Iraq's own facilities for producing the
vaccine (AP,
3 July 1999). The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
warned
in February 1999 that "Iraq would need to import the
vaccines required to fight foot-and-mouth disease [...]
Procurement of the vaccines and their timely delivery is vital
to safeguarding animal health, which is an essential component
of food security in the region. [...] The government has been
unable to adequately monitor and control the spread of these
diseases, partly because of the difficulties it has in
obtaining equipment and supplies, particularly vaccines.
As a result the Iraqi government has repeatedly sought the
assistance of FAO to deal with the outbreaks" (emphasis
added). Permission from the UN Sanctions Committee to import
foot and mouth vaccine was inconsistent...According to a Reuters
report of 13 April 1999, the US had again held up Iraq's
purchase of the vaccine in the UN Sanctions Committee for a
short period of time. Although Iraq has in general been able to
import the vaccine under the oil-for-food programme since that
date, especially as the vaccine is not on the May 2002 list of
items that need to be reviewed by the Sanctions Committee prior
to import, there may in 2001 have been suspicions that an
indigenous facility would be necessary in the event of a renewed
obstructionist US role on the Sanctions Committee....
Results of UN inspection: "By the time the
inspectors left the plant today, after four hours, they had
concluded that the plant was no longer operational -- not for
the production of toxins, and not for animal vaccines either.
Reporters who were allowed to wander through the plant after the
inspectors left found the place largely in ruins. Apparently, it
had been abandoned by the Iraqis after 1996, when the weapons
inspectors took heavy cutting equipment to the fermenters,
containers and pressurized tubing and valves used in the toxin
production." ("Inspectors
Find Only Ruins at an Old Iraqi Weapons Site", New
York Times, 29 November 2002)..."
|
2 |
| BB2-09 |
Iraq
(biological weapons) |
Bush
"...From 1991 to 1995, the Iraqi regime
said it had no biological weapons. After a senior official in
its weapons program defected and exposed this lie, the regime
admitted to producing tens of thousands of liters of anthrax and
other deadly biological agents..." |
U.S.
State Department:
"...For years, Iraq denied that it had an offensive
biological weapons program of any kind. Despite such
stonewalling, U.N. weapons inspectors uncovered evidence of
an extensive and ongoing effort to develop biological weapons.
[CG emphasis]
Then, in 1995, Hussein Kamal, Saddam's son-in-law and director
of Iraq's military industries, defected and provided
verification [CG emphasis] of Iraq's bioweapons
program. The regime was forced to admit the truth: production of
thousands of liters of such deadly agents as anthrax, botulinum
toxin, and aflatoxin..."
Compassiongate: Bush's statement was misleading
as usual compassionate in that his words suggest that a
lie was exposed by the defector. But as the State Department
says, the lie was already exposed by the U.N. inspectors and
then verified by the defectors statement. |
1 |
| BB2-10 |
Iraq
biological weapons |
Powell
for Bush
"..."Saddam Hussein...has the
wherewithal to develop smallpox"..." |
Glen
Rangwala and Raymond Whitaker (Traprockpeace.org):
"...The UN recorded in March 2003 that "there is no
evidence that Iraq had possessed seed stocks for smallpox or had
been actively engaged in smallpox research"..."
AFTER THE INVASION
AP/MSNBC:
"...Top
American scientists assigned to the weapons hunt in Iraq found
no evidence Saddam Hussein’s regime was making or stockpiling
smallpox, The Associated Press has learned from senior military
officers involved in the search...SMALLPOX
FEARS were part of the case the Bush administration used to
build support for invading Iraq — and they were raised again
as recently as last weekend by Vice President Dick Cheney.
But a three-month search by
“Team Pox” turned up only signs to the contrary: disabled
equipment that had been rendered harmless by U.N. inspectors,
Iraqi scientists deemed credible who gave no indication they had
worked with smallpox and a laboratory thought to be back in use
that was covered in cobwebs...
Two of the six members of Team Pox — whose existence and work
hasn’t been previously disclosed — have left Iraq while the
rest remain involved in other aspects of the weapons hunt, said
the officers who described the smallpox pursuit for the first
time.
Though Team Pox is no
longer operational, having carried out their work between May
and July, their findings don’t dismiss the possibility that
smallpox could still be discovered, according to the officials,
who spoke on condition of anonymity.
However, there remains
little to pursue in this area now.
“We found no physical or
new anecdotal evidence to suggest Iraq was producing smallpox or
had stocks of it in its possession,” one of the military
officers said...
Bush administration officials often cited smallpox when
describing Saddam’s intentions — and continue to do so
despite the lack of evidence.
On Sunday, Cheney said two
trailers discovered in Iraq could have been used to make
smallpox...
Despite those suspicions, Pentagon planners didn’t organize a
specific search for smallpox when they put together a
post-Saddam weapons hunt comprising hundreds of military
personnel with expertise in missiles as well as chemical,
biological and nuclear weapons.
“There was some
discussion about creating specialized teams but we didn’t have
enough people,” said Lt. Col. Michael Slifka, who planned the
weapons hunt for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency.
The original search teams,
which disbanded when a Pentagon-led effort known as the Iraq
Survey Group took over in August, comprised military officers
trained in detecting chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.
Those teams didn’t have an investigative capability and
didn’t include experts in specific areas such as smallpox.
Surprised by the
configuration, a handful of American biologists and virologists
sent to Kuwait and then Baghdad with little instruction except
to help, set up Team Pox on their own..."
|
1 |
STATEMENTS ON IRAQ'S BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS EVALUATED AFTER THE INVASION <go back to the top>
Compassion Con
credits total = 16
| # |
Topic |
President
Bush or his representative's
Compassionate statement |
Some
Uncompassionate Facts |
Compassion
Con Credits |
| BA1-01 |
Iraqi biological
weapons |
Bush
administration/CIA
"...made public its
assessment of two mysterious trailers found in Iraq, calling
them mobile units to produce deadly germs and the strongest
evidence yet that Saddam Hussein had been hiding a program to
prepare for biological warfare.
"We're highly confident" of that
judgment, an American intelligence official told reporters. The
official said the administration's strong conviction was based
mainly on the similarity between the testimony of Iraqi sources
and the evidence found on the ground..."
Bush
"...citing two trailers that U.S.
intelligence agencies have said were probably used as mobile
biological weapons labs, said U.S. forces in Iraq have
"found the weapons of mass destruction" that were the
United States' primary justification for going to war..."And
we'll find more weapons as time goes on," Bush said.
"But for those who say we haven't found the banned
manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong. We found
them."..."
Cheney
for Bush
"...We had intelligence reporting before
the war that there were at least seven of these mobile labs that
he had gone out and acquired. We’ve, since the war, found two
of them. They’re in our possession today, mobile biological
facilities that can be used to produce anthrax or smallpox or
whatever else you wanted to use during the course of developing
the capacity for an attack..."
|
William
Broad (New York Times):
"...The report called the discovery
of the trailers "the strongest evidence to date that Iraq
was hiding a biological warfare program." It also noted
that Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, in his testimony before
the United Nations on Feb. 5 to generate support for a war in
Iraq, had detailed such charges.
Both the report and the briefing, | |